GTP 2.0 - Prime Minister's Office of Malaysia

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Streamline KPI calculation: Street Crime calculation based on preceding year, not 2009 Consider other success indicators in addition to crime rates, e.g., reduction in prison inmates Track crimes committed by foreign (blue-collar) workers and illegal immigrants Focus more on addressing the general scepticism of Malaysians IPR Feedback • Petty corruption is being addressed but more emphasis is needed on grand corruption. On the issue of grand corruption, the government should implement a strong risk-management approach. This relates to identifying high risk corruption sectors such as energy, defence, telecommunications, and instituting strong checks and balances. REDuCING CRImE (CRI NkRa) FIGhtING CoRRuPtIoN NkRa (aNtI-CoRR NkRa) • Freedom of the press and freedom of information should also be encouraged, and there should be further effort to reform political financing. IPR 2011 FEEDBACK & ACTION TAKEN [NKPI will be replaced] • Street Crime KPI to be replaced with House Break-In KPI in • Tracked prison recidivism, dropped from to • Removed budget for new prison allocated for – , RM million saved IPR 2011 FEEDBACK & ACTION TAKEN Only of crimes committed by foreign workers and illegal immigrants. Efforts to tighten student visa confirm, and to monitor immigrants from some countries, e.g., Indonesia, Iran, Nigeria, Pakistan, Bangladesh Strengthened engagements with RA, women, youths, expats and businesses to help support the "United Against Crime" initiative/effort. Action taken on IPR Feecback • Risk management: GTP 2.0 focuses on ways to improve the Auditor General reporting mechanism. • Political Financing: GTP 1.0 – An amendment to the Registrar of Society Act (as part of the proposal in GTP 2.0) will require political parties to implement political financing initiatives. ImPRovING uRbaN PublIC tRaNsPoRt (uPt NkRa) WE ALSO ACTED ON IPR’S FEEDBACK IN 2012 Feedback: There needs to be congruence between pricing and policy objectives Our Position: Apart from increasing capacity and introducing “pull” measures, we need to slowly introduce “push” factors What we have done (supply-side) What we have done (demand-side) Go-KL Free Bus Service 50% discount for specific passenger segments Implement parking controls CBD Address growth of private vehicles 202 Government transformation Programme—Annual Report 2012 IPR 203 Government transformation Programme—Annual Report 2012 IPR
GTP aNNual REPORT: aGREEd uPON PROCEduRES By PRICEwaTERHOuSE COOPERS The Government Transformation Programme (GTP) is committed to high standards of transparency and accountability, which commitment is reflected in the volume of information the teams make available to the public and international reviewers through various channels. These channels include the Annual Report, Open Day Q&As as well as the regular publication of updates in the media and on its web sites. 204 The Roadmap for the first horizon for the GTP, otherwise known as GTP 1.0, was published in 2009 and contains a detailed structure of the programme’s plans and targets. The results of the initiatives in 2012 are measured against this backdrop for each specific National Key Result Area (NKRA) and are published in this annual report. Greatest care has been made to ensure that the results published in this annual report are as transparent as possible, with greatest care taken to ensure that the results collected and tabulated are accurate. To this end, PEMANDU engaged an independent third party, PricewaterhouseCoopers Malaysia (PwC), to ensure consistency and accuracy in the GTP’s methods, including data collection and measurement. PwC, an independent professional services firm, established a series of Agreed Upon Procedures (AUPs)–specific tests and procedures to review reported results–for the KPIs. The AUPs were applied to a sample taken from the key performance indicators of each NKRA and agency. Each NKRA’s calculations were also checked against guidelines and formulae originally developed in the NKRAs’ labs and prescribed by PEMANDU. Over the course of this exercise, PwC’s findings highlighted a number of exceptions on the samples selected, which were subsequently addressed and are reflected in this Annual Report. PwC has confirmed that the results reported for the selected samples in the Annual Report have been validated according to the AUPs. PwC also identified opportunities to improve processes and the quality of information. By working together with the relevant Ministries and private sector stakeholders, PEMANDU will take prescriptive action to implement these improvements over the next 12 months. Government transformation Programme—Annual Report 2012 IPR 2012 NKRa Performance and Expenditure Budget 205 In the interest of transparency and accountability, we present here a detailed summary of the NKRA performance and expenditure budget. One of the key distinctions of the GTP is its emphasis on cost effectiveness rather than expenditure. The GTP adopts a preference for budget savings, where possible, as long as it does not impede the achievements of the NKPIs. mEasuRING thE aChIEvEmENts oF thE GtP Three varying scoring methodologies were used to assess the success of the NKPIs and the NKRAs. Each one has a varying level of strictness (added rules) providing three different testing benchmarks. The rationale for this approach is to ensure that the results achieved are truly robust. The scoring methodologies are explained below: Scoring Method description Method 1 Scoring is calculated by a simple comparison against set 2012 targets. The overall NKRA composite scoring is the average of all scores Method 2 Scoring is calculated by dividing actual results against set 2012 targets with an added rule: If the scoring is less than 100%, score #2 is taken as the actual percentage If the scoring is equal or more than 100%, score#2 is taken as 100% The overall NKRA composite scoring is the average of all scores Method 3 Scoring is calculated by dividing actual results against set 2012 targets with an added rule: If the scoring is equal and less than 50%, score #3 is indicated as 0 If the scoring is more than 50% and less than 99%, score #3 is indicated as 0.5 If the scoring is equal or more than 100%, score #3 is indicated as 1 Government transformation Programme—Annual Report 2012 Performance & Expenditure
Page 3 and 4:
ANNUAL REPORT 2012 In the GTP 2.0 R
Page 5 and 6:
FoRGING ahEaD to GtP 2.0 Dato’ sR
Page 7 and 8:
CHAPTER 1 In undertaking its progra
Page 9 and 10:
GtP 1.0 2009 > 2012 The first horiz
Page 11 and 12:
BIG FaST RESulTS GTP 1.0 1.2 2012 a
Page 13 and 14:
aDDREssING thE RIsING Cost oF lIvIN
Page 15 and 16:
RaIsING lIvING staNDaRDs oF loW-INC
Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER 2 GTP 2.0: Enhancing Change
Page 19 and 20:
ImPRovING stuDENt outComEs /assuRIN
Page 21 and 22:
addressing the Rising Cost of livin
Page 23 and 24:
CHAPTER 3 ovERvIEW addressing the R
Page 25 and 26:
NatIoNal kEy PERFoRmaNCE INDICatoRs
Page 27 and 28:
48 vIEWs FRom thE Dmo: hElPING thE
Page 29 and 30:
mINIstER’s FoREWoRD Dato sERI hIs
Page 31 and 32:
THE OCCURRENCE OF RECORDED CRIMINAL
Page 33 and 34:
INITIaTIvES 4.1 The initiatives of
Page 35 and 36:
4 INCREasING thE NumbER oF aRREsts
Page 37 and 38:
I see more police presence in my ne
Page 39 and 40:
mINIstER’s FoREWoRD Dato sERI moh
Page 41 and 42:
GtP 1.0 aChIEvEmENts The Fighting C
Page 43 and 44:
INITIaTIvES 5.1 Law Enforcement and
Page 45 and 46:
One of the new initiatives of GTP 2
Page 47 and 48:
88 vIEWs FRom thE DElIvERy maNaGEmE
Page 49 and 50:
mINIstER’s FoREWoRD taN sRI Dato
Page 51 and 52:
GtP 1.0 aChIEvEmENts The work of GT
Page 53 and 54: outComE 5 Better numbers under the
Page 55 and 56: Cohort 1 Cohort 2 Cohort 3 Normal S
Page 57 and 58: One of the key goals of the Educati
Page 59 and 60: The result of the research is a set
Page 61 and 62: mINIstER’s FoREWoRD Dato’ sRI m
Page 63 and 64: GtP 1.0 aChIEvEmENts The first thre
Page 65 and 66: Participation of 43,820 households
Page 67 and 68: suCCEss stoRy Hamzah Khushi Mohamad
Page 69 and 70: lOOKING FORwaRd TO GTP 2.0 7.2 A se
Page 71 and 72: 5 Financial literacy education will
Page 73 and 74: Community Feeding PIlot PRojECts: E
Page 75 and 76: mINIstER’s FoREWoRD Dato sERI moh
Page 77 and 78: GTP 2.0 continues the work from the
Page 79 and 80: NKPI Road Delivery Peninsular Malay
Page 81 and 82: lOOKING FORwaRd TO GTP 2.0 8.2 The
Page 83 and 84: Improving urban Public Transport MO
Page 85 and 86: CHAPTER 9 ovERvIEW Improving urban
Page 87 and 88: Over the course of GTP 1.0, the UPT
Page 89 and 90: INITIaTIvES 9.1 The UPT NKRA upgrad
Page 91 and 92: lOOKING FORwaRd TO GTP 2.0 9.2 1 Bu
Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER 10 Ministerial Key Result a
Page 95 and 96: MOvING FORwaRd 10.4 Transparency re
Page 97 and 98: ImPRovING aND INstItutING oNlINE FE
Page 99 and 100: ambassador ombeni yohana sefue Chie
Page 101 and 102: alex mourmouras Chief, D5 Division,
Page 103: PovERty REDuCtIoN Both the Low-Inco
Page 107 and 108: FIGhtING CoRRuPtIoN No. NKPIs Targe
Page 109 and 110: No. NKPIs Target (Fy) actual Method
Page 111 and 112: #bajet #education #costofliving #ep
Page 113 and 114: #umGtP The #UMGTP hashtag was creat
Page 115 and 116: # a b Glossary 10mP 10th Malaysia P
Page 117 and 118: l lIh Low-Income Households lINus L
Page 119 and 120: acknowledgements The Government Tra
Page 121 and 122: RaIsING lIvING staNDaRDs oF loW INC
show all

GTP 2.0 - Prime Minister's Office of Malaysia

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?