GTP 2.0 - Prime Minister's Office of Malaysia
GTP 2.0 - Prime Minister's Office of Malaysia
GTP 2.0 - Prime Minister's Office of Malaysia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CaSE FOR<br />
CHaNGE<br />
2.1<br />
aDDREssING thE Cost<br />
oF lIvING<br />
The COL NKRA was introduced in response to the growing concerns over<br />
the rising cost <strong>of</strong> living. While the initiatives introduced have helped<br />
defray some <strong>of</strong> the heaviest burdens on less fortunate rakyat, there are<br />
no assurances that prices will not spike again in the coming three years.<br />
As a reactive NKRA, the COL NKRA will continue to monitor internal and<br />
external price pressures and implement appropriate interventions when<br />
necessary. The Government has already renewed the Bantuan Rakyat<br />
1<strong>Malaysia</strong> (BR1M) scheme for 2013, which provides a direct cash assistance<br />
to households earning less than a pre-determined threshold.<br />
<strong>GTP</strong> <strong>2.0</strong> is aimed at broadening and deepening the<br />
transformation begun in <strong>GTP</strong> 1.0, but this abstract<br />
idea drills down to specific ambitions for each<br />
respective NKRA. In line with the 3-foot philosophy<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>GTP</strong>, each NKRA has identified specific<br />
problems and solutions that will be addressed in <strong>GTP</strong><br />
<strong>2.0</strong>. More detailed information is available in the <strong>GTP</strong><br />
Roadmap <strong>2.0</strong>, but a snapshot will be provided here<br />
for each NKRA.<br />
REDuCING CRImE<br />
Despite improvements in the<br />
country’s crime statistics and their<br />
continued downward trend,<br />
surveys show that 52.8% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
rakyat continue to feel unsafe.<br />
There is therefore need for the<br />
CRI NKRA to respond to these<br />
public concerns in <strong>GTP</strong> <strong>2.0</strong> by<br />
taking further action to reduce the<br />
crime rate and to create a safe and<br />
secure environment for the rakyat.<br />
The CRI NKRA recognises that it<br />
is the right <strong>of</strong> every <strong>Malaysia</strong>n<br />
to feel safe within their own<br />
neighbourhoods, and it is the hope<br />
<strong>of</strong> the NKRA that its initiatives will<br />
enhance community collaboration<br />
to fight crime.<br />
FIGhtING CoRRuPtIoN<br />
Public perception <strong>of</strong> the<br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> anti-corruption<br />
initiatives remains low, and the<br />
Government has taken upon itself<br />
to lead the change in perception by<br />
example. Perception is nonetheless<br />
an important component <strong>of</strong> the<br />
NKRA’s targets, as corruption<br />
proliferates when the rakyat are<br />
led to believe that corruption is<br />
part and parcel <strong>of</strong> doing business<br />
in <strong>Malaysia</strong>. Public surveys, such as<br />
the Global Corruption Barometer<br />
(GCB) by independent international<br />
market analyst Frost & Sullivan,<br />
indicate that many <strong>Malaysia</strong>ns do<br />
not believe that corruption has<br />
improved since the institution<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>GTP</strong> 1.0.<br />
25%<br />
23%<br />
Public perception <strong>of</strong><br />
on government<br />
effectiveness in fighting<br />
corruption remains low<br />
27%<br />
Eective<br />
25%<br />
Ineffective<br />
25% <strong>of</strong> the public think that the<br />
Government’s eort in fighting<br />
corruption is ineective<br />
49%<br />
Neither<br />
eective<br />
nor ineective<br />
23%<br />
Improved 37%<br />
Worsened<br />
40%<br />
Stayed the same<br />
23% <strong>of</strong> the public feel that the<br />
corruption level in <strong>Malaysia</strong> for the<br />
past three years has improved<br />
Sources: Global Corruption Barometer 2011,<br />
Transparency International<br />
2007<br />
International<br />
perception <strong>of</strong> <strong>Malaysia</strong>’s<br />
effort in fighting<br />
corruption is declining<br />
5.1 5.1<br />
2009<br />
4.5<br />
4.5<br />
• <strong>Malaysia</strong>’s CPI ranking has been declining,<br />
from 39th in 2004 to 60th in 2011<br />
• Aside from the drop in ranking, the country's<br />
CPI score (omit 'has') also dropped from -<br />
between and to in <br />
• This may be attributed to the perception <strong>of</strong><br />
little progress in combating corruption and <strong>of</strong><br />
a lack <strong>of</strong> political will in implementing eective<br />
anti-corruption measures<br />
Sources: Corruption Perception Index (CPI),<br />
Transparency International<br />
4.4 4.3<br />
2009 2010 2011<br />
CPI score<br />
continued to decline<br />
from ()<br />
to ()<br />
30 Government transformation Programme—Annual Report 2012 Chapter two 31<br />
Government transformation Programme—Annual Report 2012 Chapter two<br />
2011<br />
4.3