GTP 2.0 - Prime Minister's Office of Malaysia
GTP 2.0 - Prime Minister's Office of Malaysia
GTP 2.0 - Prime Minister's Office of Malaysia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
outComE 4<br />
Minimising opportunities for corruption<br />
through automation<br />
The Road Transport Department implemented its traffic Automated<br />
Enforcement System (AES) in August 2012 under the Reduce<br />
Discretion Through Automation initiative. The goal <strong>of</strong> this initiative<br />
is to reduce opportunities for petty corruption by removing the<br />
human equation from traffic enforcement activities. Although the<br />
AES has come under criticism from some parties since its inception,<br />
the ANTI-CORR NKRA believes that these teething issues are minor<br />
inconveniences compared to the programme’s overall benefit.<br />
outComE 5<br />
Creation <strong>of</strong> the Central Asset Management<br />
Corporation<br />
The role <strong>of</strong> this Government agency is to manage confiscated assets<br />
on behalf <strong>of</strong> the Government, preserving their value and preventing<br />
them from degrading. The Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance has already structured<br />
a new division for this corporation and is presently awaiting the<br />
tabling <strong>of</strong> a corresponding bill in Parliament to establish the<br />
corporation.<br />
outComE 6<br />
Enhancement <strong>of</strong> the Corporate Integrity<br />
Pledge (CIP) programme<br />
In addition to celebrating the first anniversary <strong>of</strong> the CIP, plans are<br />
underway to provide training to pledgees to enhance corporate<br />
governance within their various organisations. The roles <strong>of</strong> the CIP<br />
Roundtable members which includes PEMANDU, Bursa <strong>Malaysia</strong>, the<br />
Securities Commission, Companies Commission <strong>of</strong> <strong>Malaysia</strong> (SSM),<br />
the <strong>Malaysia</strong>n Anti-Corruption Commission, the <strong>Malaysia</strong>n Institute <strong>of</strong><br />
Integrity (IIM), and Transparency International <strong>Malaysia</strong> (TI-M), were<br />
realigned to create a more effective and efficient implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
the CIP.<br />
NatIoNal kEy PERFoRmaNCE<br />
INDICatoRs (NkPIs)<br />
The impact <strong>of</strong> ANTI-CORR NKRA<br />
initiatives are generally intangible<br />
to the rakyat as most occur<br />
behind the scenes, though efforts<br />
have been made in the <strong>GTP</strong> to<br />
quantify their results. The most<br />
significant measure <strong>of</strong> the NKRA’s<br />
initiatives is the country’s CPI rank<br />
as determined by Transparency<br />
International.<br />
As the following KPI table<br />
shows, the ANTI-CORR NKRA<br />
enjoyed success in most <strong>of</strong> its<br />
initiatives in 2012, but not all<br />
were satisfactorily achieved due<br />
to various reasons. In the cases<br />
where an initiative failed to meet<br />
its target, important lessons were<br />
learnt, which will help guide the<br />
implementation process in <strong>GTP</strong> <strong>2.0</strong>.<br />
A change in culture, not just<br />
on the part <strong>of</strong> the Government but<br />
all other stakeholders, will require<br />
undoing decades <strong>of</strong> custom, and<br />
will require the co-operation <strong>of</strong> all<br />
<strong>Malaysia</strong>ns.<br />
Performance Indicators<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> Ministries scoring above 90% on<br />
the Procurement Accountability Index<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> arrest cases brought to trial<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> people in the database <strong>of</strong><br />
convicted <strong>of</strong>fenders<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> summons issued vs. Total hours<br />
<strong>of</strong> operations (PDRM Traffic)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> summons settled vs. No. <strong>of</strong><br />
summons issued by JPJ<br />
Transparency International Corruption<br />
Perceptions Index<br />
Percentage <strong>of</strong> trials completed<br />
within a year<br />
OVERVIEW OF 2012 KPI ACHIEVEMENTS<br />
Actual<br />
Achievement<br />
Target 2012 Result<br />
Average 97%<br />
90% Above<br />
Achievement <strong>of</strong> 90% and above<br />
25%<br />
300<br />
13<br />
60%<br />
4.9<br />
70%<br />
51 % to 89%<br />
Achievement <strong>of</strong> 51% to 89%<br />
34.7%<br />
395<br />
18<br />
47.53%<br />
49%<br />
75.5%<br />
72%<br />
139%<br />
132%<br />
138%<br />
79%<br />
100%<br />
Transparency International Global<br />
52% NA NA<br />
Corruption Barometer survey<br />
Percentage <strong>of</strong> Government procurement<br />
secured under the Integrity Pact<br />
TNS Perception Survey on how much<br />
enforcement agencies are perceived to be corrupt<br />
Whistleblower protection awareness<br />
and satisfaction survey result<br />
Full-fledged implementation <strong>of</strong> the Political<br />
Funding initiative which includes funds being<br />
credited directly into party accounts, properly<br />
recorded and available for audit<br />
25%<br />
Percentage <strong>of</strong> companies announcing Entry Point<br />
Projects (EPPs) in Progress Update to sign to CIP 100% 100% 100%<br />
100%<br />
275<br />
50%<br />
100%<br />
85%<br />
294<br />
26.8%<br />
50%<br />
Commence reporting corruption-related<br />
100% 100%<br />
cases under Whistleblower Act<br />
108%<br />
85%<br />
92%<br />
54%<br />
50%<br />
Percentage <strong>of</strong> completion <strong>of</strong> Compliance<br />
85% 93% 109%<br />
Unit activities<br />
18<br />
(change in methodology in 2012)<br />
(results to be released June 2013)<br />
100%<br />
50% Below<br />
Achievement <strong>of</strong> 50% and below<br />
78 Government transformation Programme—Annual Report 2012 Chapter Five 79<br />
Government transformation Programme—Annual Report 2012 Chapter Five
Change language