Aalborg Universitet Bike Infrastructures Report Silva, Victor ... - VBN

4.0 GENERAL COMPARISON
Figure 4.1: Distribution of the respondents by age.
Figure 4.2: Distribution of the respondents in accordance to the main trip purpose when riding a bike at
the infrastructure.
Figure 4.3: Distribution of the respondents in accordance to how often they ride a bike in the infrastructure.
Figure 4.4: Distribution of the respondents in accordance to their satisfaction with the infrastructure design
solution.
Figure 4.5: Distribution of the respondents in accordance to biking more often after the opening of the
infrastructure.
Figure 4.6: Distribution of the respondents in accordance to the distance from their residence to the infrastructure.
5.0 CONCLUSION
Figure 5.1: Cyclists and pedestrians at Vestergade Vest.
168
169
170
171
172
173
175
LIST OF tables
2.0 METHODOLOGY
Table 2.1: Date of flyers distribution, web survey opening and web survey closing for the three case
studies.
Table 2.2: Number of bike trips, cyclists, web flyers handed and a number of respondents for the
three case studies
3.1 VESTERGADE VEST AND MAGELØS
Table 3.1.1: Absolute and percentage distribution of respondents according to the distance of their
residential location from Vestergade Vest and Mageløs.
Table 3.1.2: Distribution of the respondents by gender according to the frequency they ride a bicycle
at Vestergade Vest and Mageløs.
Table 3.1.3: Distribution of the respondents by educational level according to the frequency they ride
a bicycle at Vestergade Vest and Mageløs.
Table 3.1.4 Distribution of the respondents by age groups according to the frequency they ride a bicycle
at Vestergade Vest and Mageløs.
Table 3.1.5: Distribution of the respondents by gender according to the frequency they walk at Vestergade
Vest and Mageløs.
Table 3.1.6: Distribution of the respondents by educational level according to the frequency they walk
at Vestergede Vest and Mageløs.
Table 3.1.7: Distribution of the respondents by age groups according to the frequency they walk at
Vestergade Vest and Mageløs.
Table 3.1.8: Distribution of the respondents by gender according to the main trip purpose when riding
a bike at Vestergade Vest and Mageløs.
Table 3.1.9: Distribution of the respondents by educational level according to the main trip purpose
when riding a bike at Vestergade Vest and Mageløs.
Table 3.1.10: Distribution of the respondents by age groups according to the main trip purpose when
riding a bike at Vestergade Vest and Mageløs.
Table 3.1.11: Distribution of the respondents by gender according to the frequency they ride a bike at
Vestergade Vest for the main purpose mentioned in the Figure 3.1.44, after the intervention at Vestergade
Vest and Mageløs.
Table 3.1.12: Distribution of the respondents by educational level according to the frequency they ride
a bike at Vestergade Vest for the main purpose mentioned in the Figure 3.1.44, after the intervention
at Vestergade Vest.
Table 3.1.13: Distribution of the respondents by age groups according to the frequency they ride a
bike at Vestergade Vest for the main purpose mentioned in the Figure 3.1.44, after the intervention at
Vestergade Vest.
Table 3.1.14: Distribution of the respondents by gender according to the level of satisfaction with the
design of Vestergade Vest and Mageløs.
Table 3.1.15: Distribution of the respondents by educational level according to the level of satisfaction
with the design of Vestergade Vest and Mageløs.
Table 3.1.16: Distribution of the respondents by age groups according to the level of satisfaction with
the design of Vestergade Vest and Mageløs.
Table 3.1.17: Distribution of the respondents by gender according to their opinion about how the
Vestergade Vest`s and Mageløs design fulfilled the cyclists safety aspect.
Table 3.1.18: Distribution of the respondents by educational level according to their opinion about how
the Vestergade Vest`s and Mageløs design fulfilled the cyclists safety aspect.
Table 3.1.19: Distribution of the respondents by age group according to their opinion about how the
Vestergade Vest`s and Mageløs design fulfilled the cyclists safety aspect.
Table 3.1.20: Distribution of the respondents by gender according to their opinion about how the
Vestergade Vest`s and Mageløs design fulfilled the fast connectivity.
11
11
39
48
48
48
49
49
49
49
50
50
50
50
51
51
51
51
52
52
52
52
186 187