Aalborg Universitet Bike Infrastructures Report Silva, Victor ... - VBN

More documents

Recommendations

Info

10 km 30 km 5 km 20 km 4 km 15 km 3 km 10 km 2 km 1 km 5 km N N Figure 3.3.61: Spatial distribution of the respondents according to their residential location – 5km map. Figure 3.3.62: Spatial distribution of the respondents according to their residential location – 20km 144 145
DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS AGE 35% AGE EDUCATION LEVEL 50% EDUCATION LEVEL HOW OFTEN DO YOU GO ON BRYGGEBROEN WITHOUT WALKING AT BRYGGEBRO BIKE? 70% HOW OFTEN DO YOU USE THE BIKE FOR THE PURPOSE IN THE PREVIUS QUESTION AFTER THE OPENING OF FREQUENCY OF BRYGGEBROEN? TRIPS TO THE MAIN PURPOSE 1% 1% 1% 56% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 28% 13% No answer More rarely Not as often Just as often as before More often Much more often 0% NO ANSWER 00 - 10 YEARS 11 - 20 YEARS 21 - 30 YEARS 31 - 40 YEARS Figure 3.3.63: Distribution of the respondents by age groups. 41 - 50 YEARS 51 - 60 YEARS 61 - 70 YEARS 0% NO ANSWER PUBLIC SCHOOL VOCATIONAL EDUCATION HIGH SCHOOL SHORT HIGHER EDUCATION Figure 3.3.65: Distribution of the respondents by educational level. MEDIUM HIGHER EDUCATION LONG HIGHER EDUCATION 0% NO ANSWER 6-7 DAYS OF WEEK 5 DAYS OF WEEK 3-4 DAYS OF WEEK 1-2 DAYS OF 1-3 DAYS OF WEEK MONTHS MORE RARELY Figure 3.3.67: Distribution of the respondents by the frequency they walk at Bryggebro. Figure 3.3.69: Distribution of the respondents by the frequency they ride a bike in Bryggebro for the main purpose mentioned in the Figure 3.3.68 after Bryggebro’s opening. The majority of the respondents at Bryggebro are between 31-40 years old (32%), followed closely by respondents aged 21-30 (24%) and aged 41-50 (21%). Older respondents ranged from 51-60 years old (14%) and 61-70 years old (5%). Younger respondents were aged between 11-20 (2%). There were no respondents aged between 0-10 years old. 2% of the respondents gave no answer. A large majority of respondents answered that they have attended a high education, for either a long high education (46%) or medium high education (31%). 8% of the respondents answered that they had attended a higher education for a short amount of time, and another 7% of respondents answered they had a vocational education. 3% had receiving a public school education. 1% of the respondents gave no answer. Bryggebro’ cyclists therefore seems to be commuting to jobs that require a high level of education. Respondents were asked how often they walk at Bryggebro without bike. A majority of respondents answered less than once per month (59%). 22% walked on Bryggebro 1-3 days a month, 9% answered 1-2 days a week, 7% answered 3-4 days a week. Finally, 2% stated that they walked across the bridge 6-7 days a week. This data highlights that most of Bryggebro’s cyclists do not use the site for walking. Respondents were asked how often they use their bikes for the purpose in the previous question after Bryggebro’s opening. 56 % of the respondents answered just as often as before. Notably 29% of respondents stated that they bike for that purpose much more often than before and 13% said more often than before. Only 2 % answered to travel less often or much less often 1 % of the respondents gave no answer. This data indicates that Bryggebro has had an impact on the amount of travelers, and has generated more bike trips, proving the latent demand of the bridge. . GENDER 1% GENDER RIDING A BIKE AT BRYGGEBRO 45% 40% HOW OFTEN DO YOU BIKE ON BRYGGEBROEN? WHAT IS YOUR PURPOSE ON BRYGGEBROEN? MAIN TRIP PURPOSE 1% NO ANSWER HOW SATISFIED ARE YOU WITH BRYGGEBROEN? SATISFACTION WITH BRYGGEBRO 2% 50% 49% NO ANSWER MAN WOMEN 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 3% 6% 9% 8% 4% TRANSPORTATION TO AND FROM WORK RECREATION / LEISURE VISIT FAMILY / FRIENDS PURCHASING / SHOPPING 56% 8% 1% 4% 29% NO ANSWER VERY DISSATISFIED DISSATISFIED NEUTRAL SATISFIED 5% 0% NO ANSWER 6-7 DAYS OF WEEK 5 DAYS OF WEEK 3-4 DAYS OF WEEK 1-2 DAYS OF 1-3 DAYS OF WEEK MONTHS MORE RARELY 69% TRANSPORTATION TO AND FROM SCHOOL OTHERS VERY SATISFIED Figure 3.3.64: Distribution of the respondents by gender. Figure 3.3.66: Distribution of the respondents by the frequency they ride a bicycle at Bryggebro. Figure 3.3.68: Distribution of the respondents by main trip purpose when riding a bike in Bryggebro. Figure 3.3.70: Distribution of the respondents by the level of satisfaction with Bryggebro’s design. When asked about their gender, 50% of the respondents were women and 49% were men, with 1% giving no answer. When asked how often they ride a bike at the site, a majority of the respondents said that they use the bridge 5 days per week (39%). 19% used the site 6-7 days per week, 18% said 3-4 days per week, 10% said 1-2 days per week and 8% said 1-3 days per month. Finally, 4% answered that they ride a bike at the site less than once per month. 2% of the respondents did not answers. When asked for what purpose the respondents use Bryggebro, 69% answered they use the infrastructure for commuting to and from work. 9% use Bryggebro for shopping, 8% use it to commute to school, 6% answered to see friends or family, 3% for recreation, 4% said other purposes. 1% of the respondents gave no answer. This figure again solidifies Bryggebro’s purpose as infrastructure mostly used for commuting. When asked how satisfied they were with Bryggebro, 56% responded to be very satisfied with the infrastructure. 29% stated to be satisfied, and 4% were neutral. Of the rest, 1% said they were dissatisfied and 8% said they were very dissatisfied. 2% of the respondents gave no answer. This figure shows that most cyclists appreciate Bryggebro, but there are a few users who have major concerns with the design. 146 147
Page 1 and 2:
Aalborg Universitet Bike Infrastruc
Page 3 and 4:
TITLE BIKE INFRASTRUCTURES EDITORS
Page 5 and 6:
Introduction VICTOR ANDRADE
Page 7 and 8:
SECTION ONE: DANISH NATIONAL SURVEY
Page 9 and 10:
Furthermore, 85% of the municipalit
Page 11 and 12:
Tables/illustrations Indicated leve
Page 13 and 14:
SECTION TWO: BIKE INFRASTRUCTURES V
Page 15 and 16:
1.0 INTRODUCTION Decisions on trans
Page 17 and 18:
clists evaluate these design charac
Page 19 and 20:
3.0 CASES ODENSE SHARED SPACE VESTE
Page 21 and 22:
BICYCLE NETWORK The majority of the
Page 23 and 24:
BEFORE AND AFTER BEFORE Formerly, V
Page 25 and 26:
PAVING MATERIAL DESIGN VELOCITIES T
Page 27 and 28:
STREET FURNITURE Technical elements
Page 29 and 30:
PUBLIC ART OR OTHER UNIQUE FEATURES
Page 31 and 32:
THE WEB SURVEY The web survey analy
Page 33 and 34: DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS AGE AGE 40%
Page 35 and 36: AWARENESS OF PEDESTRIANS AND MOTORI
Page 37 and 38: TRANS. TO AND FROM WORK RECREA- TIO
Page 39 and 40: VERY BAD BAD NEUTRAL GOOD VERY GOOD
Page 41 and 42: SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHICS AND OPINION ABOU
Page 45 and 46: BICYCLE NETWORK Aarhus municipality
Page 47 and 48: DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS AND STREETSC
Page 49 and 50: PAVEMENT The sidewalk and bike path
Page 51 and 52: SIGNAGE Signage includes the counti
Page 53 and 54: ACCESSIBILITY To access the new bik
Page 55 and 56: THE WEB SURVEY The web survey analy
Page 57 and 58: DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS SOCIO-DEMOGR
Page 59 and 60: AWARENESS OF PEDESTRIANS AND MOTORI
Page 63 and 64: BAD NEUTRAL GOOD VERY GOOD TOTAL 01
Page 67 and 68: BAD NEUTRAL GOOD VERY GOOD TOTAL PU
Page 69 and 70: To improve the overall air quality
Page 71 and 72: 3.3.2 BRYGGEBRO In 2006, it was ina
Page 73 and 74: TECHNICAL DRAWINGS 189448 Figure 3.
Page 75 and 76: HIERARCHY OF USERS VELOCITIES The u
Page 77 and 78: SIGNAGE There is signage on both si
Page 79 and 80: CROSSINGS, INTERSECTIONS The main i
Page 81 and 82: On the Havneholmen side of the brid
Page 83: THE WEB SURVEY The web survey analy
Page 87 and 88: AWARENESS OF PEDESTRIANS FOR PEOPLE
Page 97 and 98: 70% WALK ING WITHOUT BIK E SATISFAC
Page 99 and 100: 5.0 CONCLUSION The decision to use
Page 101 and 102: http://www.odense.dk/web4/cyklister
Page 103 and 104: 3.2 HANS BROGES GADE Figure 3.2.1:
Page 105 and 106: 4.0 GENERAL COMPARISON Figure 4.1:
Page 107 and 108: Table 3.2.10: Distribution of the r
Page 109 and 110: Table 3.3.48: Distribution of the r
Page 111 and 112: SURVEY ACCESSED ON THE WEBSITE DO Y
Page 113 and 114: Better signposting Bike maps Mainte
Page 115 and 116: CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 DEVEL
Page 117 and 118: 2 DEVELOPMENTS IN CYCLING IN THE NE
Page 119 and 120: 3 The demonstration projects in Til
Page 121 and 122: 3.2.2 The Hague The design Just as
Page 123 and 124: and to conclude whether the goals a
Page 125 and 126: • Coloured pavement to visually d
Page 127 and 128: • With regard to intersections wi
Page 129 and 130: In the late 1970s, the medium-sized
Page 131 and 132: The Reineveldbrug is part of the ma
Page 133 and 134: Noordwest Tanthof Wippolder 1982 19
Page 135 and 136:
Tables 4.13 and 4.14 show the modal
Page 137 and 138:
The outcomes of the route analyses
Page 139 and 140:
The general conclusion is that the
Page 141 and 142:
The Koepoortbrug functions mainly f
Page 143 and 144:
5 Shared space in Haren Shared spac
Page 145 and 146:
6 BICYCLE STREET IN HAARLEM A bicyc
Page 147 and 148:
7 Interurban highway for cyclists 7
Page 149 and 150:
Additionally, habitual behaviour ma
Page 151 and 152:
SECTION FOUR: RECOMMENDATIONS
Page 153:
BIKE INFRASTRUCTURES Edited by VICT
show all

Aalborg Universitet Bike Infrastructures Report Silva, Victor ... - VBN

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?