APPENDIX I Threats to <strong>Groundwater</strong> Quality <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong> Bas<strong>in</strong> — Conf<strong>in</strong>ed Animal Feed<strong>in</strong>g Operations CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 116 CONTAMINANTS 116 NUTRIENTS 117 ANTIBIOTICS 117 REGULATIONS 118 RECOMMENDATIONS 119 REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY 120 GLOSSARY 121 115
INTRODUCTION 116 In 2003 <strong>the</strong>re were an estimated 1.3 million livestock farms <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. Of <strong>the</strong>se approximately 257,000 were animal feed<strong>in</strong>g operations (AFOs), which produced more than 500 million tons of manure annually (U.S. EPA, 2003b). AFOs are locations where animals have been, are or will be conf<strong>in</strong>ed, and fed or ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed for a total of 45 days or more <strong>in</strong> any 12-month period, and where vegetation is not susta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> conf<strong>in</strong>ement area dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> normal grow<strong>in</strong>g season (U.S. EPA, 2003b). The largest AFOs are known as Concentrated Animal Feed<strong>in</strong>g Operations (CAFO) or Intensive Farm<strong>in</strong>g. CAFOs are def<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) as AFOs that are of a given size. The number and type(s) of animal(s) <strong>the</strong> operation houses and <strong>the</strong> extent to which waste from <strong>the</strong> operation may pollute surface water and groundwater determ<strong>in</strong>e whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> U.S. EPA considers a feed<strong>in</strong>g operation to be a CAFO (CDC, 2004). The Ontario M<strong>in</strong>istry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs def<strong>in</strong>es a CAFO as an AFO hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> capacity to accommodate more than 10,000 pigs or 1,500 dairy cows (Environmental Commissioner of Ontario (ECO), 2000). AFOs also can be designated as CAFOs on a case-by-case basis if <strong>the</strong> facility is determ<strong>in</strong>ed to be a significant contributor of pollutants to water (U.S. EPA, 2003b). In <strong>the</strong> U.S. <strong>the</strong>re are an estimated 15,500 CAFOs, responsible for produc<strong>in</strong>g more than 300 million tons of manure annually (U.S. EPA, 2003a). CONTAMINANTS CAFOs are a press<strong>in</strong>g environmental concern due to <strong>the</strong> large volume of manure produced, small storage space for <strong>the</strong> manure and disposal of manure through land application (U.S. EPA, 2004). Common pollutants that affect watersheds as a result of CAFOs <strong>in</strong>clude Figure 1. Road killed animals are a common sight <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong> Bas<strong>in</strong> jurisdictions Photo provided by: Cornell Waste Management Institute, 2007 nutrients, pathogens (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g parasites, bacteria and viruses), sediments, solids, endocr<strong>in</strong>e disrupt<strong>in</strong>g chemicals (EDCs), antibiotics, hormones, pesticides, trace elements and m<strong>in</strong>eral salts (CDC, 2004; U.S. EPA, 2004). Contam<strong>in</strong>ants enter waterways directly due to poor storm water management or failure of conta<strong>in</strong>ment facilities and <strong>in</strong>directly through runoff and percolation. Currently, <strong>the</strong> array of effects which <strong>the</strong>se pollutants may have on humans and <strong>the</strong> watershed are unknown (U.S. EPA, 2004). Improper management of manure from CAFOs is a threat to surface and groundwater quality and has caused serious acute and chronic water quality problems (U.S. EPA, 2003a). Substandard construction, ag<strong>in</strong>g storage facilities and illegal disposal methods can lead to large amounts of waste be<strong>in</strong>g released <strong>in</strong>to surround<strong>in</strong>g areas. In Manitowoc County, a farm agreed to pay a $59,000 state f<strong>in</strong>e for spill<strong>in</strong>g liquid animal waste <strong>in</strong>to a Lake Michigan tributary and kill<strong>in</strong>g thousands of fish (Egan, 2007). Ano<strong>the</strong>r potential source of groundwater contam<strong>in</strong>ation is wild and domestic animal carcass disposal. With high CAFO animal density, especially where fowl are raised, <strong>the</strong>re are proportionally high numbers of animal deaths. On-site burial is a common method of carcass disposal (Spellman and Whit<strong>in</strong>g, 2007). Burial site selection is <strong>the</strong>refore crucial to avoid contam<strong>in</strong>ation of water supplies. Disposal <strong>in</strong> local landfill sites is often not an option (Rennie and Hill, 2007). Road kill carcass disposal poses even greater problems. It is a press<strong>in</strong>g issue <strong>in</strong> all <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong> bas<strong>in</strong> jurisdictions due to <strong>the</strong> huge number of wild and domestic animal carcasses which must be disposed each year. In a month-long survey of road kill <strong>in</strong> just five states, 15,000 reptiles and amphibians, 48,000 mammals and 77,000 birds were counted (Havlick, 2004). About 1.5 million deer-vehicle crashes occur each year <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. (Kolb, 2006). In Pennsylvania contractors remove approximately 45,000 deer carcasses per year from highways at a cost of $30 to $40 each (Maryland Survey) <strong>in</strong> addition to 30,000 <strong>in</strong> Ohio and 65,000 annually <strong>in</strong> Michigan (Havlick, 2004). A wide variety of practices are utilized to dispose of road kill carcasses. These <strong>in</strong>clude burial on <strong>the</strong> highway right of way or <strong>in</strong> adjacent wooded areas and disposal <strong>in</strong> local landfills, where permitted (Maryland Survey; Rennie and Hill, 2007). However, <strong>the</strong>re are currently no uniform practices across <strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>ces or states, and groundwater protection is rarely considered (Maryland Survey; Rusk, 2007; Carlson, 2009). Some jurisdictions are consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> potential of compost<strong>in</strong>g road-killed animals as an environmentally friendly and cost effective alterna-
- Page 1 and 2:
AReportoftheGreatLakesScienceAdviso
- Page 3 and 4:
Citation: Great Lakes Science Advis
- Page 6:
Commissioners’ Preface The Great
- Page 9 and 10:
2 required to monitor basin groundw
- Page 11 and 12:
4 Systems have a 30-year lifespan d
- Page 13 and 14:
6 Groundwater quality is routinely
- Page 15 and 16:
8 Transmittal Letter Groundwater/An
- Page 17 and 18:
10 Acknowledgements, Activities and
- Page 19 and 20:
APPENDICES Appendices A through L p
- Page 21 and 22:
INTRODUCTION Groundwater, a major n
- Page 23 and 24:
16 DESCRIPTION OF NATURAL SYSTEMS M
- Page 25 and 26:
that are not substantially affected
- Page 27 and 28:
Estimates of the Level and Extent o
- Page 29 and 30:
APPENDIX B Threats to Groundwater Q
- Page 31 and 32:
24 PATHOGENS Bacteria, viruses and
- Page 33 and 34:
Viruses Viral pathogens continue to
- Page 35 and 36:
SPECIFIC EPISODES Walkerton In 2000
- Page 37 and 38:
30 season. The sampling sites inclu
- Page 39 and 40:
32 Curriero, F.C., Patz, J.A., Rose
- Page 41 and 42:
Infection of a suitable host specie
- Page 44 and 45:
APPENDIX C Threats to Groundwater Q
- Page 46 and 47:
Road salt has significant toxic eff
- Page 48 and 49:
converted to nitrite in the human s
- Page 50 and 51:
Atrazine Atrazine is an extensively
- Page 52 and 53:
Wisconsin DNR keeps track of about
- Page 54 and 55:
Table 1. Chemical Contaminants in G
- Page 56 and 57:
isks for 23 diseases in six contigu
- Page 58 and 59:
Figure 1. Number* of waterborne-dis
- Page 60 and 61:
Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Wa
- Page 62 and 63:
APPENDIX D Threats to Groundwater Q
- Page 64 and 65:
Figure 1. Source: General Descripti
- Page 66 and 67:
(Gorman and Halvorsen, 2006). Any s
- Page 68 and 69:
Table 3. Washtenaw County, Michigan
- Page 70 and 71:
that the OWTS would last until it w
- Page 72 and 73: REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY Aglie,
- Page 74: Septic Tanks - Septic Tank Articles
- Page 77 and 78: INTRODUCTION Leaking underground st
- Page 79 and 80: sites that were previously closed,
- Page 81 and 82: Table 1. USTs in Great Lakes States
- Page 83 and 84: Estimation of Costs for Remediation
- Page 85 and 86: Table 6. Operational Compliance of
- Page 87 and 88: 80 Indiana Government. (2007, Febru
- Page 89 and 90: 82 GLOSSARY AST - above ground stor
- Page 91 and 92: INTRODUCTION 84 Hazardous wastes ar
- Page 93 and 94: The town of Kincardine, Ontario, ha
- Page 95 and 96: 88 • The monitoring and surveilla
- Page 97 and 98: However, the U.S. EPA has been relu
- Page 99 and 100: 92 Johnson, B.L. & DeRosa, C.T. (19
- Page 101 and 102: PAHs - Polycyclic aromatic hydrocar
- Page 103 and 104: INTRODUCTION An abandoned well is d
- Page 105 and 106: Figure 6: Leaking oil well Source:
- Page 107 and 108: CONTAMINANT SOURCES 100 During any
- Page 109 and 110: Nearly 16 million operational water
- Page 111 and 112: • Development of a targeted progr
- Page 113 and 114: 106 Michigan Department of Environm
- Page 115 and 116: APPENDIX H Threats to Groundwater Q
- Page 117 and 118: far reaching. Road salt can inhibit
- Page 119 and 120: 112 Desalinization Potential water
- Page 121: Gray, J. (2004, January). Brine Spr
- Page 125 and 126: 118 feed has increased to upwards o
- Page 127 and 128: References and Bibliography 120 Arn
- Page 129 and 130: APPENDIX J Threats to Groundwater Q
- Page 131 and 132: for recreational purposes and destr
- Page 133 and 134: 126 errors (human or mechanical), p
- Page 135 and 136: Apparent Losses Old meters are like
- Page 137 and 138: Figure 6. Examples of Windsor, Onta
- Page 139 and 140: REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY 132 Ada
- Page 141 and 142: 134 Levy, S. (2004, November 16). T
- Page 143 and 144: APPENDIX K The Châteauguay Transbo
- Page 145 and 146: 138 the clay sediments of the St. L
- Page 147 and 148: REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY Bureau
- Page 149 and 150: INTRODUCTION 142 Groundwater law ac
- Page 151 and 152: 144 • Water withdrawn be returned
- Page 153 and 154: 146 found to be failing. Now, with
- Page 155 and 156: Part 373: Third Stage Treatment Lag
- Page 157 and 158: 150 Chapter 1501:15 Soil and Water
- Page 159 and 160: 152 Title 29 - Water Resources Mana
- Page 161 and 162: APPENDIX M List of Acronyms ADHD -