Groundwater in the Great Lakes Basin
Groundwater in the Great Lakes Basin
Groundwater in the Great Lakes Basin
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
100 companies are connected to more than 40% of<br />
America’s most dangerous contam<strong>in</strong>ated waste sites<br />
(Center for Public Integrity, 2007b). However, companies<br />
undergo corporate maneuver<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> order to blur<br />
and avoid f<strong>in</strong>ancial responsibility (Sapien and Knott,<br />
2007). If a polluter cannot be associated with <strong>the</strong> site, if<br />
polluters refuse to undertake cleanup actions or where<br />
polluters do not have f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources to conduct a<br />
cleanup, a trust fund, supplied ma<strong>in</strong>ly by an <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
tax, ensured that U.S. EPA could clean up <strong>the</strong> site<br />
(Sierra Club, 2004). However, that tax measure expired<br />
<strong>in</strong> 1995 and was not re<strong>in</strong>stated. When <strong>the</strong> tax expired,<br />
only 18% of Superfund’s fund<strong>in</strong>g came from taxpayers.<br />
In 2004 Superfund’s trust fund was bankrupt and now<br />
100% of <strong>the</strong> bill is footed by taxpayers (Sierra Club,<br />
2004). Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore <strong>the</strong> Superfund program has been<br />
underfunded by 1.6 to 2.6 billion dollars from 2001 to<br />
2004 (Table 1). As a result of <strong>in</strong>sufficient funds, <strong>the</strong><br />
U.S. EPA’s cleanup of Superfund sites decreased by<br />
50% from 87 sites <strong>in</strong> 1997-2000 to 43 sites <strong>in</strong> 2001-2003<br />
(Sierra Club, 2004).<br />
With <strong>in</strong>sufficient fund<strong>in</strong>g hundreds of sites rema<strong>in</strong><br />
uncontrolled (Table 2). In 2007 <strong>the</strong>re were 224 sites on<br />
<strong>the</strong> National Priorities List where contam<strong>in</strong>ated groundwater<br />
was not under control and 114 Superfund sites<br />
with no control over human exposure to possible carc<strong>in</strong>ogenic<br />
substances (Shaw, 2007). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to 2000<br />
U.S. Census data <strong>the</strong>re are more than 25 million people<br />
liv<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> 10 miles of <strong>the</strong>se 114 Superfund sites.<br />
Table 1. Under-Fund<strong>in</strong>g of Superfund Program, 2001-2004<br />
Year<br />
Superfund<br />
Budget<br />
Low-end<br />
Estimate of<br />
Superfund<br />
Program<br />
Needs<br />
Difference<br />
between<br />
Superfund<br />
Budget and<br />
Low-end<br />
Estimate<br />
High-end<br />
Estimate of<br />
Superfund<br />
Program<br />
Needs<br />
Difference<br />
between<br />
Superfund<br />
Budget and<br />
High-end<br />
Estimate<br />
2001 $1,336,000,000 $1,632,000,000 -$296,000,000 $1,740,000,000 -$404,000,000<br />
2002 $1,340,000,000 $1,759,000,000 -$419,000,000 $1,988,000,000 -$648,000,000<br />
2003 $1,265,000,000 $1,760,000,000 -$495,000,000 $2,130,000,000 -$865,000,000<br />
2004 $1,257,000,000 $1,605,000,000 -$348,000,000 $1,921,000,000 -$664,000,000<br />
Total<br />
Underfund<strong>in</strong>g<br />
-$1,558,000,000 -$2,581,000,000<br />
Source: Sierra Club, 2004<br />
Table 2.<br />
Superfund Sites Not Under Control.<br />
State Superfund Sites Sites With<br />
Contam<strong>in</strong>ated<br />
<strong>Groundwater</strong> Mitigation<br />
Not Under Control<br />
Sites With Human<br />
Exposure Not Under<br />
Control<br />
Pennsylvania 122 23 7<br />
New York 110 9 7<br />
Michigan 84 11 2<br />
Ill<strong>in</strong>ois 51 6 4<br />
M<strong>in</strong>nesota 46 1 4<br />
Wiscons<strong>in</strong> 44 1 3<br />
Ohio 44 3 0<br />
Indiana 39 6 6<br />
Total 540 60 30<br />
Source: Center for Public Integrity, 2007c.<br />
89