25.01.2014 Views

Groundwater in the Great Lakes Basin

Groundwater in the Great Lakes Basin

Groundwater in the Great Lakes Basin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 1.<br />

Number* of waterborne-disease outbreaks associated with dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water by year<br />

and etiologic agent – United States 1971-2004.<br />

wide data reveal very few reported outbreaks of disease<br />

related to chemicals <strong>in</strong> groundwater. There may well be<br />

many unreported cases, especially of milder illness.<br />

Knobeloch et al. (2000) reported on two cases of blue<br />

baby syndrome <strong>in</strong> Wiscons<strong>in</strong>. Both babies were bottlefed.<br />

The formula was reconstituted with water from<br />

private wells with levels of 22.9 and 27.4 mg/L nitrate<br />

at <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants’ illness.<br />

MMWR (1993) reported a case of blue baby syndrome<br />

<strong>in</strong> a six-week-old girl <strong>in</strong> Wiscons<strong>in</strong>. The well water<br />

had a concentration of 39.6 mg/L nitrate-nitrogen.<br />

Elevated copper levels also were found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tap water.<br />

A reverse osmosis unit on <strong>the</strong> plumb<strong>in</strong>g system failed to<br />

reduce nitrate levels <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water adequately<br />

to prevent blue baby syndrome. The tap water was used<br />

to reconstitute <strong>in</strong>fant formula.<br />

SURVEILLANCE AND MONITORING FOR<br />

CHEMICALS IN GROUNDWATER<br />

Ontario Prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>Groundwater</strong> Monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Network<br />

The Ontario Prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>Groundwater</strong> Monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Network (OPGMN) is a partnership program of <strong>the</strong><br />

Ontario M<strong>in</strong>istry of <strong>the</strong> Environment with <strong>the</strong> local<br />

conservation authorities and local municipalities where<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are no local conservation authorities (OPGMN,<br />

2007). The OPGMN now has 423 wells that are located<br />

<strong>in</strong> various areas, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g contam<strong>in</strong>ated sites. The<br />

local conservation authorities or municipalities collect<br />

water from <strong>the</strong>se wells. The wells are monitored for<br />

<strong>the</strong> ambient (basel<strong>in</strong>e) groundwater quantity, flow<br />

and quality of specific aquifers. This <strong>in</strong>formation helps<br />

establish basel<strong>in</strong>e conditions and assess how groundwater<br />

is affected by land use and water use.<br />

The OPGMN monitors groundwater for chemical<br />

exceedences <strong>in</strong> accordance to <strong>the</strong> Ontario Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Water Quality Standards (O. Reg. 169/03) under <strong>the</strong> Safe<br />

Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Water Act, 2002. The program also uses <strong>the</strong><br />

Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for Canadian Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Water Quality and <strong>the</strong><br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for Use at Contam<strong>in</strong>ated Sites <strong>in</strong> Ontario to<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e which chemicals are of <strong>in</strong>terest and may exceed<br />

<strong>the</strong> “upper limit” (threshold value used when a chemical is<br />

not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> O. Reg. 169/03). The <strong>in</strong>formation collected<br />

is <strong>in</strong>tended to help identify trends and emerg<strong>in</strong>g issues<br />

and provide guidance to local decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g authorities<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir resource management decisions. Two of <strong>the</strong><br />

pesticides of note that were detected from <strong>the</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

wells are chlorpyrifos and diaz<strong>in</strong>on. The OPGMN has<br />

reported that none of <strong>the</strong> pesticides detected are <strong>in</strong><br />

exceedence of <strong>the</strong> Ontario Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Water Quality<br />

Standards (Grgic, personal communication).<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Chemical contam<strong>in</strong>ation of groundwater is a threat to<br />

<strong>the</strong> health of residents <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong>-St. Lawrence<br />

River Bas<strong>in</strong>. The chemicals of widespread concern are<br />

arsenic, fluoride, radionuclides, radon, uranium and<br />

manganese <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> geological areas, and nitrates/<br />

nitrites and atraz<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> agricultural areas where<br />

<strong>the</strong>y have been used extensively. Many chlor<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

solvents and o<strong>the</strong>r VOCs are a concern ei<strong>the</strong>r because<br />

of disposal <strong>in</strong> landfills, hazardous waste sites, spills or<br />

leak<strong>in</strong>g underground storage tanks. Trichloroethylene,<br />

tetrachloroethylene and benzene are <strong>the</strong> most serious<br />

concerns. <strong>Groundwater</strong> is not a major route of exposure<br />

to pesticides, but atraz<strong>in</strong>e may be <strong>the</strong> exception.<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!