Groundwater in the Great Lakes Basin
Groundwater in the Great Lakes Basin
Groundwater in the Great Lakes Basin
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
146<br />
found to be fail<strong>in</strong>g. Now, with a high level of awareness<br />
and state grants to landowners to repair or replace<br />
fail<strong>in</strong>g septic systems, more than 80% of systems pass<br />
<strong>in</strong>spection.<br />
In Ontario, septic system construction permits are<br />
issued and <strong>in</strong>spections done by designated local<br />
agencies (usually public health units) <strong>in</strong> accordance<br />
with prov<strong>in</strong>cial standards set out <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ontario Build<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Code. There is evidence, however, that up to 20% of<br />
septic systems are <strong>in</strong>stalled without a permit. There are<br />
standards for septic system operation and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance,<br />
but ma<strong>in</strong>tenance standards have been poorly enforced.<br />
Municipalities have authority to establish ongo<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>spection programs and at least 23 municipalities<br />
have done so. F<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly<br />
push<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>in</strong>spections when lend<strong>in</strong>g to prospective<br />
purchasers. The Clean Water Act, 2006, adopted <strong>in</strong><br />
2007, <strong>in</strong>cluded amendments to <strong>the</strong> Build<strong>in</strong>g Code Act<br />
authoriz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial cab<strong>in</strong>et to adopt regulations<br />
guid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> establishment of septic system <strong>in</strong>spection<br />
and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance programs. It is <strong>in</strong>tended that such<br />
programs would be mandatory <strong>in</strong> prescribed dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />
water source protection areas and discretionary <strong>in</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r areas.<br />
Quebec regulations require that septic systems for yearround<br />
residences be pumped every two years and, for<br />
seasonal residences, every four years.<br />
Ohio amended its sewage code <strong>in</strong> 2005 and adopted<br />
new standards <strong>in</strong> 2007 that will ensure greater consistency<br />
across <strong>the</strong> state <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sit<strong>in</strong>g and construction<br />
of septic systems. Local boards of health are given<br />
authority to adopt more str<strong>in</strong>gent standards and to<br />
establish <strong>in</strong>spection programs, but are not required to<br />
do so.<br />
A major impediment to better management of septic<br />
systems <strong>in</strong> all jurisdictions is a lack of tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>spectors<br />
and resources to hire and tra<strong>in</strong> staff.<br />
Abandoned Wells<br />
There are millions of unplugged wells across <strong>the</strong> bas<strong>in</strong><br />
that are direct conduits <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> groundwater for<br />
contam<strong>in</strong>ants. They also pose a safety hazard. Most<br />
jurisdictions now require a landowner who abandons<br />
a well to ensure it is plugged <strong>in</strong> accordance with state<br />
or prov<strong>in</strong>cial standards specify<strong>in</strong>g how this must be<br />
done and by whom. In practice, when a well is be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
immediately replaced, most exist<strong>in</strong>g wells are plugged.<br />
Although <strong>the</strong>re are few requirements to locate and<br />
plug long-abandoned wells, many <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong> jurisdictions<br />
do provide <strong>in</strong>centives or cost-share programs to<br />
encourage this.<br />
Legal liability for harm caused by an abandoned well<br />
lies with <strong>the</strong> landowner. Ill<strong>in</strong>ois law makes a landowner<br />
whose abandoned well contam<strong>in</strong>ates <strong>the</strong> groundwater<br />
of o<strong>the</strong>rs responsible for provid<strong>in</strong>g a safe and sufficient<br />
alternative supply of water to <strong>the</strong>m.<br />
Michigan has an Abandoned Well Management<br />
Program that provides state grants to locate and plug<br />
abandoned wells. This program was implemented<br />
though local health departments. The state paid 75% of<br />
<strong>the</strong> cost of decommission<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> local government<br />
paid <strong>the</strong> rest.<br />
Wiscons<strong>in</strong> law requires local governments to have a<br />
well fill<strong>in</strong>g and seal<strong>in</strong>g ord<strong>in</strong>ance. The state provides<br />
“Well Abandonment Grants” to <strong>in</strong>dividual landowners<br />
to pay 75% of <strong>the</strong> cost of decommission<strong>in</strong>g an abandoned<br />
well found on <strong>the</strong>ir property.<br />
M<strong>in</strong>nesota is <strong>the</strong> only <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong> jurisdiction with<br />
a well disclosure law. Whenever land is be<strong>in</strong>g sold,<br />
<strong>the</strong> owner must disclose to <strong>the</strong> purchaser <strong>the</strong> location<br />
and status of all wells on <strong>the</strong> land prior to sign<strong>in</strong>g an<br />
agreement of purchase and sale. At clos<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> vendor<br />
must sign a certificate attest<strong>in</strong>g to this disclosure, and<br />
a deed cannot be registered without this certificate.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>formation is also provided to <strong>the</strong> Department of<br />
Health, which follows up evidence of abandoned wells<br />
by tak<strong>in</strong>g action to decommission <strong>the</strong>m.<br />
Ontario regulates wells at <strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial, ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />
<strong>the</strong> local, level. Similar to o<strong>the</strong>r jurisdictions, it has<br />
standards and report<strong>in</strong>g requirements for decommission<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a well. However, prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>in</strong>spection<br />
and enforcement of both construction and decommission<strong>in</strong>g<br />
dropped off significantly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> late<br />
1990s, lead<strong>in</strong>g to a number of problems. A prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />
study estimated that nearly 90% of Ontario wells<br />
are <strong>in</strong> need of repair or ma<strong>in</strong>tenance. O<strong>the</strong>r evidence<br />
suggests that <strong>the</strong> major entry po<strong>in</strong>t of contam<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
<strong>in</strong>to wells is breached cas<strong>in</strong>gs. Due to <strong>the</strong> Walkerton<br />
Inquiry, <strong>the</strong> Ontario government has been pushed<br />
toward improv<strong>in</strong>g enforcement. The M<strong>in</strong>istry of <strong>the</strong><br />
Environment <strong>in</strong> partnership with <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry of<br />
Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, <strong>the</strong> Association of<br />
Professional Geoscientists and community organizations<br />
undertook an active education program for well<br />
users. In addition, <strong>the</strong> Agriculture M<strong>in</strong>istry funded a<br />
cost shar<strong>in</strong>g pilot program for upgrad<strong>in</strong>g and decommission<strong>in</strong>g<br />
abandoned wells. It was successful, but<br />
some of <strong>the</strong> money allocated went unspent, suggest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> need for greater awareness and education on <strong>the</strong><br />
part of rural landowners.