APPENDIX D Threats to <strong>Groundwater</strong> Quality <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong> Bas<strong>in</strong> — On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems, Septage and Sludge CONTENTS BACKGROUND 56 NUMBER OF SEPTIC SYSTEMS 56 TYPES OF SEPTIC SYSTEMS 57 GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION FROM SYSTEM FAILURE AND SEPTAGE DISPOSAL 59 CONTAMINANTS FROM ON-SITE SYSTEMS, SEPTAGE AND SLUDGE 60 AGING AND FAILING SEPTIC SYSTEMS IN THE BASIN 60 FAILURE PREVENTION – REGULAR MAINTENANCE AND BACKWASH FLUSHING 61 ON-SITE SYSTEM REGULATION 62 RECOMMENDATIONS 64 REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY 65 55
BACKGROUND The first underground septic systems were used by <strong>the</strong> French <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1870s (CDC, 2006). By <strong>the</strong> mid-1880s, two-chamber, automatic siphon<strong>in</strong>g tank systems, <strong>the</strong> ones commonly used today, were <strong>in</strong>stalled <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States (CDC, 2006). More than a century later, <strong>the</strong>se on-site wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) are proliferat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong> Bas<strong>in</strong> due to expand<strong>in</strong>g and widely distributed populations that lack access to centralized sewer systems (CDC, 2006). (See Table 1.) The term on-site wastewater treatment system refers to systems utiliz<strong>in</strong>g sub-surface disposal. They range <strong>in</strong> size from <strong>in</strong>dividual s<strong>in</strong>gle-family systems to systems serv<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>esses, commercial developments, <strong>in</strong>stitutions or groups of homes with flows up to 10,000 gallons per day. Today’s residential septic tanks are typically made of concrete, steel, fiberglass, polyethylene or o<strong>the</strong>r approved material, which hold 1,000 gallons or more of wastewater (CDC, 2006). In areas with on-site disposal systems, most of <strong>the</strong> liquid waste will enter <strong>the</strong> groundwater (Howard, 2002). In Bermuda, for example, septic discharge provides 35% of <strong>the</strong> total aquifer recharge (Howard, 2002). NUMBER OF SEPTIC SYSTEMS One-quarter to one-third of homes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. use septic systems (CDC, 2006), and approximately one-third of new residential homes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. are constructed with septic or o<strong>the</strong>r forms of on-site wastewater treatment systems (Rafter, 2005). In Canada many rural homes also rely on septic systems (Canada Mortgage and Hous<strong>in</strong>g Corp., 2007). In Michigan approximately 50% of new homes are constructed with septic tanks (Fishbeck, Thompson, and Carr and Huber Inc., 2004). In M<strong>in</strong>nesota it is estimated that approximately 86% or 535,000 homes rely on on-site systems; of <strong>the</strong>se, an estimated 144,000 were fail<strong>in</strong>g and 64,000 posed an imm<strong>in</strong>ent threat to public health and safety (McDilda, 2007). Septic tank deterioration is a major concern. In Door County, Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, 80% to 90% of tanks <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area come out of <strong>the</strong> ground look<strong>in</strong>g like Swiss cheese (Dayton, 2008). It is estimated that $1.2 billion is needed <strong>in</strong> order to address <strong>the</strong> state’s septic problems and an additional $3.4 billion to address sewer and wastewater treatment plant issues (Wallace, Nivala and Brandt, 2006). Maryland is estimated to have 420,000 septic tanks with an additional 1,000 <strong>in</strong>stalled each year (Murray, 2004). In 2004 a bill was passed implement<strong>in</strong>g a $30 annual fee for homeowners with septic tanks. Table 1. Number of On-Site Systems by State and Prov<strong>in</strong>ce Source: Adapted from presentation by Ric Falardeau at <strong>the</strong> Science Advisory Board’s <strong>Groundwater</strong> Consultation, Lans<strong>in</strong>g, Michigan, March 2006. State / Prov<strong>in</strong>ce Total Number of Systems Permits per Year Ill<strong>in</strong>ois ND ND 50,000 Indiana 800,000 14,500 50,000 Michigan 1,400,000 35,000 455,000 M<strong>in</strong>nesota 535,000 17,500 35,000 New York ND ND 200,000 Ohio 1,000,000 20,000 110,000 Ontario 1,200,000 2 25,000 3 ND Pennsylvania ND ND 25,000 Wiscons<strong>in</strong> 680,000 21,000 110,000 Number of Systems <strong>in</strong> Counties that Border <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong> 1 56 1 In <strong>the</strong> U.S. 100% of <strong>the</strong> 67 county or regional agencies that border a <strong>Great</strong> Lake and that regulate OWTS were surveyed. In Ontario, <strong>the</strong> only prov<strong>in</strong>ce border<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong>, one office was surveyed at each level with<strong>in</strong> a border<strong>in</strong>g region: a regional (un<strong>in</strong>corporated area), township or county level and/or municipal level (build<strong>in</strong>g department) office. The total U.S. and Canada survey attempted 80 offices of which 74 (93%) responded. Adapted from Gorman and Halvorsen, 2006. 2 Estimate; actual number unknown (Doug Joy, personal communication at <strong>the</strong> Syracuse <strong>Groundwater</strong> Consultation). 3 Number of new or replacement systems per year; 5% are advanced technology (Doug Joy, personal communication). ND – No data
- Page 1 and 2:
AReportoftheGreatLakesScienceAdviso
- Page 3 and 4:
Citation: Great Lakes Science Advis
- Page 6:
Commissioners’ Preface The Great
- Page 9 and 10:
2 required to monitor basin groundw
- Page 11 and 12: 4 Systems have a 30-year lifespan d
- Page 13 and 14: 6 Groundwater quality is routinely
- Page 15 and 16: 8 Transmittal Letter Groundwater/An
- Page 17 and 18: 10 Acknowledgements, Activities and
- Page 19 and 20: APPENDICES Appendices A through L p
- Page 21 and 22: INTRODUCTION Groundwater, a major n
- Page 23 and 24: 16 DESCRIPTION OF NATURAL SYSTEMS M
- Page 25 and 26: that are not substantially affected
- Page 27 and 28: Estimates of the Level and Extent o
- Page 29 and 30: APPENDIX B Threats to Groundwater Q
- Page 31 and 32: 24 PATHOGENS Bacteria, viruses and
- Page 33 and 34: Viruses Viral pathogens continue to
- Page 35 and 36: SPECIFIC EPISODES Walkerton In 2000
- Page 37 and 38: 30 season. The sampling sites inclu
- Page 39 and 40: 32 Curriero, F.C., Patz, J.A., Rose
- Page 41 and 42: Infection of a suitable host specie
- Page 44 and 45: APPENDIX C Threats to Groundwater Q
- Page 46 and 47: Road salt has significant toxic eff
- Page 48 and 49: converted to nitrite in the human s
- Page 50 and 51: Atrazine Atrazine is an extensively
- Page 52 and 53: Wisconsin DNR keeps track of about
- Page 54 and 55: Table 1. Chemical Contaminants in G
- Page 56 and 57: isks for 23 diseases in six contigu
- Page 58 and 59: Figure 1. Number* of waterborne-dis
- Page 60 and 61: Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Wa
- Page 64 and 65: Figure 1. Source: General Descripti
- Page 66 and 67: (Gorman and Halvorsen, 2006). Any s
- Page 68 and 69: Table 3. Washtenaw County, Michigan
- Page 70 and 71: that the OWTS would last until it w
- Page 72 and 73: REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY Aglie,
- Page 74: Septic Tanks - Septic Tank Articles
- Page 77 and 78: INTRODUCTION Leaking underground st
- Page 79 and 80: sites that were previously closed,
- Page 81 and 82: Table 1. USTs in Great Lakes States
- Page 83 and 84: Estimation of Costs for Remediation
- Page 85 and 86: Table 6. Operational Compliance of
- Page 87 and 88: 80 Indiana Government. (2007, Febru
- Page 89 and 90: 82 GLOSSARY AST - above ground stor
- Page 91 and 92: INTRODUCTION 84 Hazardous wastes ar
- Page 93 and 94: The town of Kincardine, Ontario, ha
- Page 95 and 96: 88 • The monitoring and surveilla
- Page 97 and 98: However, the U.S. EPA has been relu
- Page 99 and 100: 92 Johnson, B.L. & DeRosa, C.T. (19
- Page 101 and 102: PAHs - Polycyclic aromatic hydrocar
- Page 103 and 104: INTRODUCTION An abandoned well is d
- Page 105 and 106: Figure 6: Leaking oil well Source:
- Page 107 and 108: CONTAMINANT SOURCES 100 During any
- Page 109 and 110: Nearly 16 million operational water
- Page 111 and 112: • Development of a targeted progr
- Page 113 and 114:
106 Michigan Department of Environm
- Page 115 and 116:
APPENDIX H Threats to Groundwater Q
- Page 117 and 118:
far reaching. Road salt can inhibit
- Page 119 and 120:
112 Desalinization Potential water
- Page 121 and 122:
Gray, J. (2004, January). Brine Spr
- Page 123 and 124:
INTRODUCTION 116 In 2003 there were
- Page 125 and 126:
118 feed has increased to upwards o
- Page 127 and 128:
References and Bibliography 120 Arn
- Page 129 and 130:
APPENDIX J Threats to Groundwater Q
- Page 131 and 132:
for recreational purposes and destr
- Page 133 and 134:
126 errors (human or mechanical), p
- Page 135 and 136:
Apparent Losses Old meters are like
- Page 137 and 138:
Figure 6. Examples of Windsor, Onta
- Page 139 and 140:
REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY 132 Ada
- Page 141 and 142:
134 Levy, S. (2004, November 16). T
- Page 143 and 144:
APPENDIX K The Châteauguay Transbo
- Page 145 and 146:
138 the clay sediments of the St. L
- Page 147 and 148:
REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY Bureau
- Page 149 and 150:
INTRODUCTION 142 Groundwater law ac
- Page 151 and 152:
144 • Water withdrawn be returned
- Page 153 and 154:
146 found to be failing. Now, with
- Page 155 and 156:
Part 373: Third Stage Treatment Lag
- Page 157 and 158:
150 Chapter 1501:15 Soil and Water
- Page 159 and 160:
152 Title 29 - Water Resources Mana
- Page 161 and 162:
APPENDIX M List of Acronyms ADHD -