28.01.2014 Views

RESEARCH· ·1970·

RESEARCH· ·1970·

RESEARCH· ·1970·

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

B202<br />

GROUND-WATER RECHARGE<br />

Water is unconfined in the upper part of the aquifer<br />

near the Jordan Narrows, and it is poorly confined in<br />

the lower part by thin discontinuous beds of silty and<br />

sandy clay. The confining beds themselves are moderately<br />

permeable, however, and there is appreciable<br />

movement of water between the upper and lower parts<br />

of ~he aquifer. The ground-water surface (figs. 1 and<br />

2) shows that the water is moving from Utah Valley<br />

toward the Jordan Valley. Some of the water is discharged<br />

by wells, evapotranspiration, and springs<br />

north of the Jordan Narrows, however, before it<br />

reaches the main artesian aquifer in the Jordan Valley.<br />

The quantity of underflow through the Jordan N arrows<br />

was computed at a narrow section of the<br />

saturated unconsolidated valley fill. The west end of<br />

the section can be located accurately because it abuts<br />

an outcrop of semiconsolidated fine-grained material<br />

of low average hydraulic conductivity. The location of<br />

the east end of the section is less precise because it is<br />

marked by the intersection of the water table and semiconsolidated<br />

or consolidated material of low hydraulic<br />

conductivity, which is concealed beneath the north<br />

slope of Point of the Mountain (fig. 1). By correlatio~<br />

of water-level data, data showing depth to material of<br />

low hydraulic conductivity in wells, and data from the<br />

electrical sounding profile, it was possible to determine<br />

a range for the location of the east end of the section.<br />

The minimum width of the section so estimated is<br />

about 2,700 feet (B-B' in figs. 1 and 3), and the maximum<br />

width is about 4,000 feet (B-B" in figs. 1 and 3).<br />

ALTITUDE,<br />

IN FEET.<br />

4600-<br />

4200-<br />

t><br />

D<br />

0<br />

Material of high hydraulic<br />

conductivity<br />

Material of low hydraulic<br />

conductivity·<br />

EXPLANATION<br />

Zone into which material of<br />

high hydraulic conductivity<br />

may extend<br />

0<br />

• • 0<br />

0 500 1000 FEET<br />

DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL<br />

VERTICAL SCALE EXAGGERATED<br />

FIGURE 3.-Section along B-B '-B" (fig. 1), showing idealized<br />

zones used in computation of underflow from Utah Valley to<br />

Jordan Valley near the Jordan Narrows.<br />

The thickness of saturated unconsolidated valley fill<br />

near the middle of the section across the aquifer is<br />

about 125 feet at well 3. If 125 feet is used as·an average<br />

. thic~ness for the entire section, therefore, the<br />

saturated cross-sectional area (A) is 340,000 square<br />

feet for the minimum width of 2,700 feet and 500,000<br />

square feet for the maximum width of 4,000 feet.<br />

The average hydraulic gradient (/) of the underflow<br />

at the section was determined from water levels in<br />

wells 2, 3, and 4· in figures 1 and 2, and is about 0.0002.<br />

An aquifer test was made in order to estimate the<br />

hydraulic conductivity (K) at the section by pumping<br />

well 3 · and observing the amount and rates of waterlevel<br />

dra wdown in wells 3 and 4. The hydraulic conductivity<br />

was determined from the nonequilibrium<br />

equation of the flow of ground water that was developed<br />

by Theis ( 1935) and from a. method developed<br />

by Theis, Brown, and Meyer (Bentall, 1963, p. 331-<br />

340). The average hydraulic conductivity is high,<br />

about 3,200 cubic feet per day per square foot.<br />

The Darcy equation, applied to the section of minimum<br />

width (B-B'), yields:<br />

Q= (3,200 ft per day) (0.0002) (340,000 ft 2 )<br />

=218,000 ft 3 per day,<br />

or about 1,800 acre-feet per year. Applied to the section<br />

of maximum width ( B-B"), the equation yields:<br />

Q = ( 3,200 ft per day) ( 0.0002) ( 500,000 ft 2 )<br />

= 320,000 ft 3 per day,<br />

or about 2,700 acre-feet per year. The quantity of underflow<br />

through the semiconsolidated and consolidated material<br />

bounding the aquifer is small, certainly not<br />

exceeding 10 percent of the quantity of underflow in the<br />

aquifer. The total underflow from Utah Valley toward<br />

Jordan Valley, therefore, is between 2,000 and 3,000<br />

acre-feet per year; and it probably averages about 2,500<br />

acre-feet per year.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Bentall, Ray, 1963, Methods of determining permeability, transmissibility,<br />

and drawdown: U.S. Geol. Survey Water-Supply<br />

Paper 1536--1, p. 243-341.<br />

Pitcher, G. G., 1957, Geology of the Jordan Narrows quadrangle,<br />

Utah: Brigham Young Univ., Research Studies, Geology<br />

Series, v. 4, no. 4, 46 p.<br />

Theis, C. V., 1935. The relation between the lowering of the<br />

piezometric surface and the· rate and duration of discharge<br />

of a well using ground-water storage : Am. Geophys. Union<br />

Trans., v. 16, p. 519-524.<br />

Zohdy, A. A. R., and Jackson, D. B., 1969, Electrical sounding<br />

profile east of the Jordan Narrows, Utah, in Geological<br />

Survey Research 1969: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper<br />

650-C, p. 083-088.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!