RESEARCH· ·1970·
RESEARCH· ·1970·
RESEARCH· ·1970·
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
HANNA<br />
B75<br />
·~<br />
pentinites were emplaced within zones of weakness<br />
produced by stress patterns related to broad areas of<br />
folding and faulting throughout much of the present<br />
California, Coast H.anges. The geophysical data do not<br />
directly bear on other questions of the proposed klippe<br />
Ol'lglll.<br />
In summary, generalized interpretations of shallow<br />
stubsurfa.ce rocks ·n,re shown in figure 4 (p. B76-B77) ws<br />
profiles ..tl-..tl' tHld 13-B' -across the nor1thern and souther11<br />
parts of the :t-ren,, •respectively. Crust~l features shown in<br />
tJhe ·cross sections satisfy the 'ree~.dual gra.vity anmm11ly<br />
n;nd n.erom·ttgne•tic •anoma;]y profi·les to -a. good approximation,<br />
n.lthough only a small part of some geologic features<br />
occur in the sections. For example, the ultramafic<br />
serpentinite bodies producing major 1nagnetic anomnJies<br />
may, on the basis of modeling results, extend to<br />
depths of more than 10 miles, although physicochmnicnJ<br />
conditions not considered here may impose restrictions<br />
on these depths.<br />
Construction of the idealized geologic sections was<br />
controlled by known surface geology, a limited number<br />
of ·well data, and assumed values for density and<br />
magnetizn.tion contrasts of subsurface rocks. The average<br />
density contrast between Cenozoic rocks and l\1esozoic<br />
miogeosynclinal rocks, Franciscan rocks, or Salinian<br />
basement was assumed to be 0.5 g/cm 3 , whereas<br />
that between serpentinites and l\1esozoic rocks was<br />
taken to be about 0.1 g/cm 3 • The total 1nagnetization<br />
of serpentinites relative to nonmagnetic rocks was<br />
assumed to be 0.0025 emu/cm 3 , whereas that of Salinian<br />
basement rocks was taken to be half that of the<br />
serpentinites, or 0.00125 emu/cm 3 • Total magnetization<br />
was everywhere assumed to be parallel to the earth's<br />
present field dh·ection. Subsurface interpretations using<br />
these assumed values of density and magnetization<br />
contrast are intended to provide a basis for refinement<br />
using more detailed geophysical and geologic information<br />
as it becomes available.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Bailey, E. H., Irwin, ,V. P., and .Jones, D. r..~., 1964, Franciscan<br />
and related rocl~s, and their significance in the geology of<br />
western California: California Div. Mines and Geology<br />
Bull. 183, 177 p.<br />
Bateman, P. C., and Eaton, .J. P., 1967, Sierra Nevada batholith:<br />
Science, v. 158, no. 3807, p. 1407-1417.<br />
Bishop, C. C., and Chapman, R. H., 1967, Bouguer gravity map<br />
of California, Santa Cruz sheet: California Div. Mines and<br />
Geology, scale 1 :250,000.<br />
Burch, S. H., 1968, Tectonic emplacement of the Burro Mountain<br />
ultramafic body, Santa Lucia Range, California: Geol.<br />
Soc. America Bull., v. 79, no. 5, p. 527-544.<br />
--- 1970, Complete Bouguer gravity and general geology of<br />
the Cape San Martin, Bryson, Piedras Blancas, and San<br />
Simeon quadrangles, California: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof.<br />
Paper 64~A [In Press].<br />
Burch, S. H., Grannell, R. B., and Hanna, W. F., 1970, Bouguer<br />
gravity map of California, San Luis Obispo·sheet: California<br />
Div. Mines and Geology, scale 1:250,000 [In Press].<br />
Byerly, Perry, 1938, Comment on "The Sierra Nevada in the<br />
light of isostasy, by Andrew C. Lawson": Geol. Soc. America<br />
Bull., v. 48, no. 12, p. 2025-2031.<br />
Byerly, P. E., 1966, Interpretations of gravity data from the<br />
central Coast Ranges and San Joaquin Valley, California:<br />
Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 77, no. 11, p. 83-94.<br />
Chapman, R. H., 1966, The California Division of Mines and<br />
Geology gravity base station network: California Div. Mines<br />
and Geology Spec. Rept. 90, 49 p.<br />
Chesterman, C. \V., 1952, Descriptive petrography of rocks<br />
dredged off the coast of central California : California Acad.<br />
Sci. Proc., 4th ser., v. 27, p. 359-374.<br />
Compton, R. R., 1966, Granitic and metamorphic rocl{S of the<br />
Salinian block, California Coast Ranges 'in Bailey, E. H.,<br />
ed., Geology of northern California: California Dlv. Mines<br />
and Geology Bull. 190, p. 277-287.<br />
Curtis, G. H., Evernden, J. 1!,., and Lipson, J., 1958, Age determination<br />
of some grantic rocks in California by the potassium-argon<br />
method: California Div. Mines Spec. Rept. 54,<br />
16 p.<br />
Eaton, .J. P., 1963, Crustal structure from San Francisco, California,<br />
to Eureka, Nevada, from seismic-refraction measurements:<br />
.Jour. Geophys. Research, v. 68, no. 20, p. 5789-5806.<br />
--- 1966, Crustal structure in northern and central California<br />
from seismic evidence, in Bailey, E. H., ed., Geology<br />
of northern California: California Div. Mines and Geology<br />
Bull. 190, p. 419-426.<br />
Hall, C. A., and Corbat6, C. E., 1967, Stratigraphy and structure<br />
of :Mesozoic and Cenozoic rocl{s, Nipomo quadrangle, southern<br />
Coast Ranges, California: Geol. Soc. America Bull.,<br />
v. 78, no. 5, p. 559-582. ·<br />
Hanna, G. D., 1952, Geology of the continental slope off central<br />
California: California Acad. Sci. Proc., 4th ser., v. 27, no. 9,<br />
p. 325-358.<br />
Healy, J. H., 1963, Crustal ·structure along the coast of California<br />
from seismic-refraction measurements: Jour. Geophys.<br />
Research, v. 68, no. 20, p. 5777-5787.<br />
Hill, M. I.-., and Dibblee, T. \V., Jr., 1953, San Andreas, Garlock,<br />
and Big Pine faults, California-A .Study of the character,<br />
history, and tectonic significance of their displacements:<br />
Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 64, no. 4, p. 443-458.<br />
Hsu, K. J., 1966, On the klippe origin of the Franciscan rocks<br />
of Santa Lucia Range, California-A working hypothesis:<br />
Geol. Soc. America Spec. Paper 87, p. 82-83.<br />
--- 1967, Mesozoic geology of the California Coast Ranges<br />
A new working hypothesis, in I~tages tectoniques. Colloque<br />
de Neuchatel, Neuchatel Univ. Inst. Geol., 1966: Neuchatel,<br />
Switzerland, La Baconniere, p. 279-296.<br />
--- 1968, Principles of melanges and their bearing on the<br />
Franciscan-Knoxville paradox: Geol. Soc. America Bull.,<br />
v. 79, no. 8, p. 1063-1074.<br />
Hutton, C. 0., 1959, Mineralogy of beach sands between Halfmoon<br />
and Monterey Bays, California: California Div. Mines<br />
Spec. Rept. 59, 32 p.<br />
.Jennings, C. "'·• 19~8, Geologic map of California, Olaf P.<br />
Jenkins edition, San Luis Obispo sheet: California Div.<br />
Mines, scale 1 :250,000.<br />
.Jennings, C. "'·• and Strand, R. G., 1959, Geologic map of California,<br />
Olaf P. Jenkins edition, Santa Cruz sheet: California<br />
Div. Mines, scale 1 :250,000.<br />
372-490 0 - 70 - 6