28.01.2014 Views

RESEARCH· ·1970·

RESEARCH· ·1970·

RESEARCH· ·1970·

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HANNA<br />

B75<br />

·~<br />

pentinites were emplaced within zones of weakness<br />

produced by stress patterns related to broad areas of<br />

folding and faulting throughout much of the present<br />

California, Coast H.anges. The geophysical data do not<br />

directly bear on other questions of the proposed klippe<br />

Ol'lglll.<br />

In summary, generalized interpretations of shallow<br />

stubsurfa.ce rocks ·n,re shown in figure 4 (p. B76-B77) ws<br />

profiles ..tl-..tl' tHld 13-B' -across the nor1thern and souther11<br />

parts of the :t-ren,, •respectively. Crust~l features shown in<br />

tJhe ·cross sections satisfy the 'ree~.dual gra.vity anmm11ly<br />

n;nd n.erom·ttgne•tic •anoma;]y profi·les to -a. good approximation,<br />

n.lthough only a small part of some geologic features<br />

occur in the sections. For example, the ultramafic<br />

serpentinite bodies producing major 1nagnetic anomnJies<br />

may, on the basis of modeling results, extend to<br />

depths of more than 10 miles, although physicochmnicnJ<br />

conditions not considered here may impose restrictions<br />

on these depths.<br />

Construction of the idealized geologic sections was<br />

controlled by known surface geology, a limited number<br />

of ·well data, and assumed values for density and<br />

magnetizn.tion contrasts of subsurface rocks. The average<br />

density contrast between Cenozoic rocks and l\1esozoic<br />

miogeosynclinal rocks, Franciscan rocks, or Salinian<br />

basement was assumed to be 0.5 g/cm 3 , whereas<br />

that between serpentinites and l\1esozoic rocks was<br />

taken to be about 0.1 g/cm 3 • The total 1nagnetization<br />

of serpentinites relative to nonmagnetic rocks was<br />

assumed to be 0.0025 emu/cm 3 , whereas that of Salinian<br />

basement rocks was taken to be half that of the<br />

serpentinites, or 0.00125 emu/cm 3 • Total magnetization<br />

was everywhere assumed to be parallel to the earth's<br />

present field dh·ection. Subsurface interpretations using<br />

these assumed values of density and magnetization<br />

contrast are intended to provide a basis for refinement<br />

using more detailed geophysical and geologic information<br />

as it becomes available.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Bailey, E. H., Irwin, ,V. P., and .Jones, D. r..~., 1964, Franciscan<br />

and related rocl~s, and their significance in the geology of<br />

western California: California Div. Mines and Geology<br />

Bull. 183, 177 p.<br />

Bateman, P. C., and Eaton, .J. P., 1967, Sierra Nevada batholith:<br />

Science, v. 158, no. 3807, p. 1407-1417.<br />

Bishop, C. C., and Chapman, R. H., 1967, Bouguer gravity map<br />

of California, Santa Cruz sheet: California Div. Mines and<br />

Geology, scale 1 :250,000.<br />

Burch, S. H., 1968, Tectonic emplacement of the Burro Mountain<br />

ultramafic body, Santa Lucia Range, California: Geol.<br />

Soc. America Bull., v. 79, no. 5, p. 527-544.<br />

--- 1970, Complete Bouguer gravity and general geology of<br />

the Cape San Martin, Bryson, Piedras Blancas, and San<br />

Simeon quadrangles, California: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof.<br />

Paper 64~A [In Press].<br />

Burch, S. H., Grannell, R. B., and Hanna, W. F., 1970, Bouguer<br />

gravity map of California, San Luis Obispo·sheet: California<br />

Div. Mines and Geology, scale 1:250,000 [In Press].<br />

Byerly, Perry, 1938, Comment on "The Sierra Nevada in the<br />

light of isostasy, by Andrew C. Lawson": Geol. Soc. America<br />

Bull., v. 48, no. 12, p. 2025-2031.<br />

Byerly, P. E., 1966, Interpretations of gravity data from the<br />

central Coast Ranges and San Joaquin Valley, California:<br />

Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 77, no. 11, p. 83-94.<br />

Chapman, R. H., 1966, The California Division of Mines and<br />

Geology gravity base station network: California Div. Mines<br />

and Geology Spec. Rept. 90, 49 p.<br />

Chesterman, C. \V., 1952, Descriptive petrography of rocks<br />

dredged off the coast of central California : California Acad.<br />

Sci. Proc., 4th ser., v. 27, p. 359-374.<br />

Compton, R. R., 1966, Granitic and metamorphic rocl{S of the<br />

Salinian block, California Coast Ranges 'in Bailey, E. H.,<br />

ed., Geology of northern California: California Dlv. Mines<br />

and Geology Bull. 190, p. 277-287.<br />

Curtis, G. H., Evernden, J. 1!,., and Lipson, J., 1958, Age determination<br />

of some grantic rocks in California by the potassium-argon<br />

method: California Div. Mines Spec. Rept. 54,<br />

16 p.<br />

Eaton, .J. P., 1963, Crustal structure from San Francisco, California,<br />

to Eureka, Nevada, from seismic-refraction measurements:<br />

.Jour. Geophys. Research, v. 68, no. 20, p. 5789-5806.<br />

--- 1966, Crustal structure in northern and central California<br />

from seismic evidence, in Bailey, E. H., ed., Geology<br />

of northern California: California Div. Mines and Geology<br />

Bull. 190, p. 419-426.<br />

Hall, C. A., and Corbat6, C. E., 1967, Stratigraphy and structure<br />

of :Mesozoic and Cenozoic rocl{s, Nipomo quadrangle, southern<br />

Coast Ranges, California: Geol. Soc. America Bull.,<br />

v. 78, no. 5, p. 559-582. ·<br />

Hanna, G. D., 1952, Geology of the continental slope off central<br />

California: California Acad. Sci. Proc., 4th ser., v. 27, no. 9,<br />

p. 325-358.<br />

Healy, J. H., 1963, Crustal ·structure along the coast of California<br />

from seismic-refraction measurements: Jour. Geophys.<br />

Research, v. 68, no. 20, p. 5777-5787.<br />

Hill, M. I.-., and Dibblee, T. \V., Jr., 1953, San Andreas, Garlock,<br />

and Big Pine faults, California-A .Study of the character,<br />

history, and tectonic significance of their displacements:<br />

Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 64, no. 4, p. 443-458.<br />

Hsu, K. J., 1966, On the klippe origin of the Franciscan rocks<br />

of Santa Lucia Range, California-A working hypothesis:<br />

Geol. Soc. America Spec. Paper 87, p. 82-83.<br />

--- 1967, Mesozoic geology of the California Coast Ranges­<br />

A new working hypothesis, in I~tages tectoniques. Colloque<br />

de Neuchatel, Neuchatel Univ. Inst. Geol., 1966: Neuchatel,<br />

Switzerland, La Baconniere, p. 279-296.<br />

--- 1968, Principles of melanges and their bearing on the<br />

Franciscan-Knoxville paradox: Geol. Soc. America Bull.,<br />

v. 79, no. 8, p. 1063-1074.<br />

Hutton, C. 0., 1959, Mineralogy of beach sands between Halfmoon<br />

and Monterey Bays, California: California Div. Mines<br />

Spec. Rept. 59, 32 p.<br />

.Jennings, C. "'·• 19~8, Geologic map of California, Olaf P.<br />

Jenkins edition, San Luis Obispo sheet: California Div.<br />

Mines, scale 1 :250,000.<br />

.Jennings, C. "'·• and Strand, R. G., 1959, Geologic map of California,<br />

Olaf P. Jenkins edition, Santa Cruz sheet: California<br />

Div. Mines, scale 1 :250,000.<br />

372-490 0 - 70 - 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!