28.01.2014 Views

RESEARCH· ·1970·

RESEARCH· ·1970·

RESEARCH· ·1970·

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESEARCH 1970<br />

GROUND WATER-SURFACE WATE'R RELATION<br />

DURING PERIODS OF OVERLAND FLOW<br />

By JAMES F. DANIEL; LOUIS W. CABLE,<br />

and RONALD j. WOLF, Indianapolis, Ind.<br />

Abst·raot.-The ground-water exchange mechanism at the<br />

stream interface during periods of overland runoff was investigated<br />

by means of obse.rvation wells installed in the :flood plain<br />

on the White River near Noblesville, Ind. Ground-water discharge<br />

decreases with the beginning of a stream rise, ceases<br />

nfter n short time interval, and then bank storage occurs. A<br />

volume of discharge from the aquifer equal to that which<br />

entered as bank storage at the study site was dissipated 54<br />

hours after an overbank peak, 42 hours after a medium peak<br />

and 50 hours after a small peak. The results were used to<br />

formulate a theoretical method for stream-hydrograph separation<br />

of base flow and overland flow. The separation method<br />

shows no ground-water runoff until bank storage and channel<br />

storage volumes have been dissipated. All discharge in the<br />

stream before and after this period is equal to that contributed<br />

hy the aquifer system.<br />

In the course of a recent water-resources investigation<br />

in Indiana, it was desirable to separate streamdischarge<br />

hydrogra phs into overland runoff and baseflow<br />

components. The principal problem was what<br />

occurs when the stream level rises rapidly owing to<br />

floodflow. flow, then, should the stream-discharge<br />

hydrograph be separated~ A search of the available<br />

literature on the subject found numerous methods, none<br />

of which seemed to deal satisfactorily with floodflow<br />

conditions. To answer this question it was necessary to<br />

acquire a better understanding of the reaction of the<br />

subsurface flow system to a rise in stream level. Pogge<br />

( 1966) has reported some significant information concerning<br />

the relation of surface and subsurface flow<br />

systems, and. Cooper and Rorabaugh (1963) have described<br />

the theoretical reaction of ground-water levels<br />

to a symmetrical flood pu~se when and where the initial<br />

ground-water levels were horizontal.<br />

A limited research project was designed to investigate<br />

the mechanism of ground-water discharge at the<br />

stream interface and to develop a method for analyzing<br />

ground-water runoff. To accomplish this it was necessary<br />

to: (1) observe the reaction of ground-w:ater<br />

levels to fluctuations in stream level, (2) determine<br />

from these observations the direction of ground-water<br />

movement as it changes with time, and ( 3) relate these<br />

data to the stream-discharge hydrograph.<br />

Acknowledgment.-Special thanks is extended to<br />

1\ir. Tom Benefiel for permission to install observation<br />

wells on his property in the course of the investigation.<br />

SITE SELECTION A!ND WELL rNSTALLATION<br />

A field site was chosen on the White River adjacent<br />

to the U.S. Geological Survey stream-gaging station,<br />

between Cicero and Strawtown, near Noblesville, Ind.<br />

(fig. 1). At the site the alluvium is composed of sand<br />

and gravel capped by a layer of silt and clay about<br />

6 to 7 feet thick. The potentiometric level in the sand<br />

and gravel is usually above the base of the silt-clay<br />

layer so that artesian or leaky- artesian conditions gen-<br />

•<br />

Gaging station<br />

.3<br />

Observation well and number<br />

0 2000 FEET<br />

FIGURE 1.----Study area location and site sketch.<br />

U.S. GEOL. SURVEY PROF. PAPER 70G-B, PAGES B99-B223 ·<br />

B219<br />

372-490 0- 70- 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!