28.01.2014 Views

RESEARCH· ·1970·

RESEARCH· ·1970·

RESEARCH· ·1970·

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BENNETT AND McQUIVEY<br />

turbulence in open-channel flow, the bulk of the energy<br />

occurs at much lower :frequencies (below 10Hz) than it<br />

does in air. For this reason, the power spectral densities<br />

of this study were obtained by digital-cmnputer methods,<br />

wherein the low-frequency resolution is limited<br />

only by t,he length of record which can be processed.<br />

.Data processing by digital methods could not be accomplished<br />

in the field, so the output voltages from the<br />

1nensuring systems were recorded on n~agnctic tape for<br />

later n .. nalysis. The output :from the hot-fihn anemometer<br />

was recorded directly; that from the propeller flowmeter<br />

1neasuring syst01n had to be amplified before it<br />

could be recorded. '"!"he a-c amplifier used had n. lowfrequency<br />

cutoff of 1 II~.<br />

In addition to measurements of power specti·al<br />

density, several measurements were made in which only<br />

longitudinal turbulence intensities, 1~', were obtained.<br />

The voltage intensity for substitution into equa.tion 6<br />

was obtn .. ined frotn an analog root-mean-square (rms)<br />

voltage meter or, when a..va,ilable, from the output of the<br />

computation program :for power spectral density. The<br />

analog rms meter had a low-frequency cutoff of 0.5 l-Iz,<br />

and 11 high-frequency-response flat well beyond the<br />

ra.nge of frequencies o:f interest. The 0.5-Ilz cutoff prevents<br />

the rms 1neter from n1ensur.ing all the turbulence<br />

energy eontained in the velocity fluctuations having frequencies<br />

o:f less than 0.5 l-Iz.<br />

Because the output of the hot-f-ilm anemometer could<br />

be corrected for drift, and because the hot-film anemometer<br />

:is free of inertial and spatial averaging problems,<br />

the results of :the hot-iihn measurements have been used<br />

as stanclnrcls for judging the perfonnance of the propeller<br />

flown1eter.<br />

MEASUREMENT OF POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY<br />

B259<br />

Power spectral densities, S 00<br />

(.f), obtained from the<br />

propeller output for the measurements in the Atrisco<br />

Feeder Canal are given in figure 5, where y is the distanee<br />

above the bed and } 7 the total depth of flow. The<br />

broken curves on this figure a.re the power spectral<br />

densities after they have been corrected for the system<br />

.function. Owing to the differences in roughness height<br />

a .. nd spaeing between the Atrisco channel and the artificially<br />

roughened ehannel in which Bennett (1968)<br />

1neasured the efficiency of spatial resolution (fig. 4), it<br />

was felt that the '1 (f)'s of figure 4 should not be used as<br />

corrections for the field da;ta. (In any ca.se, the Lx/U's of<br />

figu:_e 5 are, except for 5D, all outside the range of<br />

La:!U of figure 4.) Thus no corrections for the efficiency<br />

of spatial resolution could be 1nade; '1 (f) was assumed to<br />

be 1.0. Power spectral densities obtained frmn the hotfilm<br />

anemon1eter over the same relative d~pth range are<br />

presented in figure 6.<br />

The effect of the spatial averaging of the propeller<br />

on the power spectral density of tlie turbulence ·can be<br />

seen in figure 7. In this figure, the power spectral densities<br />

corrected for the system function of the propel~er<br />

as shown in figure 5 have been plotted along with those<br />

of the hot-film anemometer frmn figure 6 for the nearest<br />

available relative depth. The spectra of figures 5,<br />

6, and 7 have been computed using a digital version of<br />

equation 2. Thus those spectra are normalized. Owing to<br />

the normalizing procedure, there is a vertical positioning<br />

difference between the propeller curves and the<br />

hot-film eurves of figure 7. This is due not only to<br />

propeller characteristics but to the exclusion from the<br />

Ill<br />

0<br />

z<br />

0<br />

u<br />

100<br />

10-1<br />

U.J<br />

Ill 10- 2<br />

~<br />

.....<br />

...<br />

VI<br />

A<br />

10- 3 1:-:0.34 ·-~<br />

iJ = 1.68 feet<br />

per second<br />

f :0.94<br />

\ B<br />

' ' .,<br />

' '<br />

\<br />

..' \ \<br />

.. \<br />

~=0.21<br />

u<br />

\<br />

.<br />

\<br />

\<br />

\<br />

10-·<br />

1 10 10<br />

.!:..!.::0.22 •<br />

iJ<br />

c<br />

.!!._ :::0.31<br />

L~<br />

a ==1.67 feet<br />

per second<br />

f :0.67<br />

10<br />

f,IN HERTZ<br />

.<br />

d •<br />

T,. =0.35<br />

D<br />

iJ =1.68 feet<br />

per second<br />

f :::0.66<br />

E<br />

\<br />

\<br />

\<br />

., \<br />

\<br />

\<br />

\<br />

\<br />

\<br />

\<br />

10 10<br />

\<br />

\<br />

\<br />

\<br />

l!'roum~ 5.-Power spectral densities S(f) as functions of frequency t~· propeller output (solid line) corrected for<br />

propeller frequency response (broken line). Measurements made in Atrisco Feeder Canal.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!