28.02.2014 Views

SMS Siemag AG - Alu-web.de

SMS Siemag AG - Alu-web.de

SMS Siemag AG - Alu-web.de

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

technology<br />

A hot topic: Specifying linings for industrial kilns and furnaces<br />

Dave Barrington, general manager, Morgan Advanced Materials<br />

Selecting the most effective insulation<br />

material for furnace applications is a key<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>ration and one that can <strong>de</strong>liver<br />

a major performance advantage and<br />

measurable commercial return. When the<br />

impact of thermal conductivity on longterm<br />

cost and energy efficiency is taken<br />

into account, the benefits of an effective<br />

insulation material soon become apparent.<br />

A range of materials is available<br />

for the market, yet it can be difficult to<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rstand the benefits of one material<br />

when compared to another. However,<br />

whatever insulation material is chosen, its<br />

key attribute should be low thermal conductivity,<br />

which will enable it to restrict<br />

the flow of heat from the furnace to the<br />

external environment.<br />

Heat loss from a high temperature source such<br />

as a furnace is dominated by infra-red radiation.<br />

This is blocked by the fibres contained<br />

in a fibrous insulation material. The larger the<br />

number of fibres, the more effective the insulation<br />

will be. A superior insulation material will<br />

therefore have the best possible fibre in<strong>de</strong>x<br />

and contain a minimal number of ‘shot’ (unfiberised<br />

globular glass fibre) particles. Some<br />

materials on the market feature high shot<br />

content and coarse fibres, neither of which<br />

are beneficial for blocking high temperature<br />

thermal radiation.<br />

When specifying insulating materials for<br />

use as back-up lining in kilns and furnaces,<br />

which have castable or brick forming the hot<br />

face, <strong>de</strong>signers and specifiers must look beyond<br />

the initial purchase cost of the insulating<br />

materials to ensure their system will <strong>de</strong>liver<br />

optimum long-term performance and return<br />

on investment. The main options for these applications<br />

are typically calcium silicate or low<br />

biopersistent fibre-based boards. Calcium silicate<br />

has been commercially available for more<br />

than 50 years, its high compressive strength<br />

makes it well suited to kiln car bases.<br />

The compressive strength of calcium silicate<br />

might seem like a key benefit, and while it can<br />

endure heavy loads, its lack of flexibility does<br />

mean the material can be prone to cracking<br />

when put un<strong>de</strong>r certain strains that are difficult<br />

for the material to withstand. Fibrebased<br />

boards <strong>de</strong>rive their strength from the<br />

interlinking of fibres during manufacture. The<br />

more fibres that are available to link together,<br />

then the greater the strength and durability<br />

Calcium silicate edge<br />

of the board. The advantages to a board with<br />

high fibre count inclu<strong>de</strong> easy installation and<br />

handling, excellent strength and resistance to<br />

cracking.<br />

testing thermal conductivity<br />

Low biopersistent fibre-based boards were introduced<br />

to the market in the mid 1990s. The<br />

latest versions combine high-specification low<br />

biopersistent fibres, fillers and organic bin<strong>de</strong>rs.<br />

These boards are engineered to maximise<br />

the content of insulating low biopersistent fibres<br />

by reducing the size and amount of ‘shot’,<br />

and so <strong>de</strong>liver significantly reduced thermal<br />

conductivity offering enhanced energy-saving<br />

properties.<br />

Recent tests carried out at the most common<br />

operating temperatures for furnace backup<br />

board – between 600 and 800 ºC – revealed<br />

that in the key area of thermal conductivity,<br />

the latest low biopersistent fibre-based board<br />

outperformed calcium silicate by an average<br />

of 20 percent at 600 ºC and 15 percent at<br />

800 ºC. While calcium silicate typically costs<br />

less than low biopersistent fibre-based board,<br />

the wasted heat and associated energy costs<br />

more than outweigh the lower initial purchase<br />

cost.<br />

The physical properties of the two materials<br />

should also be evaluated by specifiers.<br />

Morgan Advanced Materials low biopersistent<br />

fibre-based Superwool Plus Blok <strong>de</strong>livers greater<br />

process advantages and more energy-efficient<br />

solutions in furnace applications<br />

Calcium silicate corner<br />

Calcium silicate is brittle, making it prone<br />

to chipping, crumbling and breakage during<br />

transportation, handling and stacking. These<br />

issues are ma<strong>de</strong> worse during machining and<br />

installation. Calcium silicate also creates consi<strong>de</strong>rably<br />

greater levels of dust than low biopersistent<br />

fibre-based board when chopped,<br />

shaped or handled, which potentially exposes<br />

operatives to the inhalation of a particulate.<br />

Dealing with this requires the use of appropriate<br />

respiratory protective equipment, which<br />

adds to the cost.<br />

the advantages to a<br />

water-resistant system<br />

A further key issue with these products is that<br />

of water absorption, as one installation option<br />

is to apply a castable material directly onto<br />

the back-up lining material. While low biopersistent<br />

fibre based board products are treated<br />

to be water repellent (hydrophobic), calcium<br />

silicate boards are highly water absorbent. This<br />

can result in the castable becoming dry and<br />

not curing correctly. It can also result in water<br />

becoming trapped in the back-up lining, leading<br />

to possible material damage. Therefore, in<br />

addition to accelerating heat loss and requiring<br />

more energy, the calcium silicate board<br />

will physically <strong>de</strong>teriorate and compromise<br />

the effectiveness of the system, resulting in a<br />

shorter product lifespan and potentially unsafe<br />

working conditions. Leading low biopersistent<br />

fibre-based boards do not require a<br />

water vapour barrier.<br />

the true cost of energy efficiency<br />

Demand for energy around the world is steadily<br />

increasing year-on-year, and looks set to<br />

continue to rise in years to come. There are<br />

numerous reasons for companies to prioritise<br />

the energy efficiency of their operations, including<br />

surcharges on energy bills, tax credits<br />

for energy-saving initiatives and increased<br />

© Margan Advanced Materials<br />

ALUMINIUM · 5/2013 53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!