06.03.2014 Views

Download Volume II Accomplisments (28 Mb pdf). - IRIS

Download Volume II Accomplisments (28 Mb pdf). - IRIS

Download Volume II Accomplisments (28 Mb pdf). - IRIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Shallow Shear-Velocity Measurements and Prediction of<br />

Earthquake Shaking in the Wellington Metropolitan Area,<br />

New Zealand<br />

John N. Louie (University of Nevada, Reno)<br />

The city of Wellington, New Zealand’s capital, sits astride the Australia-Pacific plate boundary at a transition from strike slip<br />

to subduction motion. The resulting high earthquake hazard and risk motivate multiple research efforts to better understand the<br />

potential for seismic shaking. Physics-based modeling of a Landers-type M7.2 rupture on the Wellington fault, which transects<br />

the city, by Benites and Olsen [2005] showed potential for peak ground velocities as high as 1.5 m/s. Such a high hazard demands<br />

a thorough understanding of the setting, and few measurements of ground-stiffness parameters such as the average shear velocity<br />

from the surface to 30 m depth (Vs30) existed in Wellington prior to 1996. That year Kaiser and Louie (2006 and not yet published)<br />

made refraction microtremor measurements of Vs30 at 46 sites in Wellington and Lower Hutt cities (fig. 1). Benites and<br />

Olsen’s (2005) geotechnical model included velocities for “rock” sites that were a factor of two higher than the measurements, so<br />

we developed a revised model from the measurements. We then used the E3D physics-based modeling code of Larsen et al. [2001]<br />

to predict ground motions for a M3.2 event 8 km below the city that year, using both the original and revised models (fig. 2). The<br />

revised model is not quite as efficient at trapping wave energy in basins, as was the original model. Most of the Vs30 measurements<br />

were made at strong-motion recording stations, so the resulting seismometer data are now better calibrated for site conditions.<br />

References<br />

Benites, Rafael and Kim B. Olsen, 2005, Modeling strong ground motion in the Wellington metropolitan area, New Zealand: Bull. Seismol.<br />

Soc. Amer., 95, 2180–2196.<br />

Kaiser, A. E., and J. N. Louie, 2006, Shear-wave velocities in Parkway basin, Wainuiomata, from refraction microtremor surface wave dispersion:<br />

GNS Science Report 2006/024, July, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, 16 pp.<br />

Larsen, S., Wiley, R., Roberts, P., and House, L., 2001, Next-generation numerical modeling: incorporating elasticity, anisotropy and attenuation:<br />

Society of Exploration Geophysicists Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1218-1221.<br />

Acknowledgements: Research supported by a 2006 Fulbright Senior Scholar award to Louie for work in New Zealand, and by GNS Science. Instruments<br />

used in the field program were provided courtesy of M. Savage of the Victoria University of Wellington, and S. Harder of the University of Texas El Paso.<br />

Figure 1: Map of average shear velocity from the surface to 30 m depth assembled for the Wellington – Lower Hutt region of New Zealand, with the 1500 m/s velocity<br />

isosurface in shaded relief to show bedrock and basin-floor topography from Benites and Olsen (2005). Locations of 27 of 46 sites measured in 2006 for shallow shear<br />

velocity are marked with dashed circles, labeled with the measured Vs30 in m/s. Kaiser and Louie (2006) made an additional 19 measurements in one neighborhood<br />

in the lower center of the map, with only two results shown here. The measurements allowed a revision of the shallow velocity model, with Vs30 not exceeding 800<br />

m/s. The basin-bounding Wellington fault runs along the northwest side of the basin.<br />

Figure 2: Map of peak ground velocity (PGV) computed for the Wellington – Lower Hutt region of New Zealand for a M3.2 event 8 km below the city, with the 1500 m/s<br />

velocity isosurface in shaded relief to show bedrock and basin-floor topography from Benites and Olsen (2005). The yellow color indicates PGV as high as 2.27 cm/s.<br />

3D effects of complex basin geometry and soft soils are evident.<br />

<strong>II</strong>-124 | 2010 <strong>IRIS</strong> Core Programs Proposal | <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>II</strong> | Crustal Structure

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!