06.03.2014 Views

Download Volume II Accomplisments (28 Mb pdf). - IRIS

Download Volume II Accomplisments (28 Mb pdf). - IRIS

Download Volume II Accomplisments (28 Mb pdf). - IRIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Effect of S-Velocity Heterogeneity in the North American Crust<br />

and Mantle on Waveforms of Regional Surface Waves from the<br />

February 2008 Nevada Earthquake<br />

Sung-Joon Chang (Northwestern University), Suzan van der Lee (Northwestern University)<br />

We compare observed waveforms recorded at the USArray Transportable Array stations from the 02/21/08 Nevada earthquake<br />

(Mw 6.0) with synthetics through three-dimensional (3D) velocity models such as S20RTS [Ritsema et al., 1999] and NA04 [Van<br />

der Lee and Frederiksen, 2005]. A crustal model CRUST2.0 is incorporated into the mantle velocity model S20RTS. We calculate<br />

synthetics down to 17 s through: 1) mode summation for a 1D model obtained by averaging velocity variations in the 3D model<br />

between the epicenter and the station (path-average method), and 2) the Spectral Element Method [Komatitsch and Tromp, 1999].<br />

Because the Nevada earthquake occurred almost at the center of the Transportable Array stations at that time, distances between<br />

the epicenter and stations are typically less than 1000 km. In general, the 3D models predict the observed waveforms better than a<br />

reference 1D model, but some waveform fits need<br />

to be significantly improved by better 3D models<br />

of velocity heterogeneity and discontinuity depth.<br />

We find the spectral element method and pathaveraging<br />

method produce similar waveforms for<br />

inland, while a little different synthetics are generated<br />

with the two methods for ocean-continent<br />

boundary.<br />

References<br />

Komatitsch, D. and J. Tromp (1999), Introduction to<br />

the spectral-element method for 3-D seismic wave<br />

propagation, Geophys. J. Int., 139, 806-822.<br />

Ritsema, J., H. J. van Heijst, and J. H. Woodhouse<br />

(1999), Complex shear wave velocity structure<br />

imaged beneath Africa and Iceland, Science, <strong>28</strong>6,<br />

1925-19<strong>28</strong>.<br />

Van der Lee, S. and A. Frederiksen (2005), Surface wave<br />

tomography applied to the North American upper<br />

mantle, in Seismic Earth: Array analysis of broadband<br />

seismograms, pp. 67-80, eds. A. Levander and<br />

G. Nolet, Geophys. Mono. 157, AGU, Washington,<br />

DC.<br />

Acknowledgements: We thank the <strong>IRIS</strong> DMC for providing<br />

waveform data used in this research. This<br />

study was supported by NSF EAR-0645752.<br />

(a) The Nevada Earthquake (Mw 6.0) indicated as a star was recorded at over 400 broadband stations<br />

in USArray indicated as triangles. Some stations are surrounded by red circles where observed<br />

waveforms are obtained to be compared with synthetics. (b) Comparison between observed waveforms<br />

and several synthetics at stations surrounded by red circles in (a).<br />

<strong>II</strong>-210 | 2010 <strong>IRIS</strong> Core Programs Proposal | <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>II</strong> | Upper Mantle Structure and Dynamics

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!