06.03.2014 Views

Download Volume II Accomplisments (28 Mb pdf). - IRIS

Download Volume II Accomplisments (28 Mb pdf). - IRIS

Download Volume II Accomplisments (28 Mb pdf). - IRIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Imaging the Seattle Basin to Improve Seismic Hazard Assessments<br />

Andrew A Delorey (University of Washington), John E Vidale (University of Washington)<br />

Much of Seattle lies atop a deep sedimentary basin. The Seattle Basin amplifies and distorts the seismic waves from nearby<br />

moderate and large earthquakes in ways that modulate the hazard from earthquakes. Seismic hazard assessments heavily depend<br />

upon upper crustal and near-surface S-wave velocity models, which have traditionally been constructed from P-wave models<br />

using an empirical relationship between P-wave and S-wave velocity or by interpolating across widely spaced observations of<br />

shallow geologic structures. Improving the accuracy and resolution of basin S-wave models is key to improving seismic hazard<br />

assessments and predictions for ground shaking. Tomography, with short-period Rayleigh waves extracted using noise interferometry,<br />

can refine S-wave velocity models in urban areas with dense arrays of short period and broadband instruments. We<br />

apply this technique to the Seattle area to develop a new shallow S-wave model for use in hazard assessment. Continuous data<br />

from the Seismic Hazards in Puget Sound (SHIPS) array as well as permanent stations from the Pacific Northwest Seismograph<br />

Network (PNSN) and Earthscope’s Transportable Array (TA) have inter-station distances are as short as a few kilometers. This<br />

allows us to extract Rayleigh waves between 2 and 10 seconds period that are sensitive to shallow basin structure. Our results<br />

show that shear wave velocities are about 25% lower in some regions in the upper 3 km than previous estimates. Using the new<br />

velocity model we run earthquake simulations using a finite difference code to validate the model, and then to make predictions<br />

on the level of ground-shaking for various realistic earthquake scenarios at various locations around the urban area.<br />

Acknowledgements: This study is funded by the National Earthquake Hazards Program (NEHRP).<br />

Shown are the stations used for this study. The black curves indicate the coastline<br />

of Puget Sound and Seattle is located where stations are clustered in the<br />

center of the figure. The UW Broadband (circles) and Earthscope Transportable<br />

Array stations (triangles) were used to get background velocity and the SHIPS<br />

stations (stars) were used to image the Seattle Basin.<br />

Shown are Rayleigh wave phase velocities for periods between 2 and 10 seconds.<br />

2010 <strong>IRIS</strong> Core Programs Proposal | <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>II</strong> | Crustal Structure | <strong>II</strong>-141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!