thesis_Daniela Noethen_print final - Jacobs University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Preventing Knowledge Loss When Employees Expect to Leave Lancaster, L. C., & Stillman, D. (2002). When generations collide. New York: Harper Business. Leibold, M., & Voelpel, S. (2006). Managing the aging workforce: Challenges and solutions. New York: Wiley. Maertz, C. P., Griffeth, R. W., Campbell, N. S., & Allen, D. G. (2007). The effects of perceived organizational support and perceived supervisor support on employee turnover. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 1059-1075. Manzoni, J., & Barsoux, J. (2002). The set-up-to-fail syndrome: How good managers cause great people to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Massingham, P. (2008). Measuring the impact of knowledge loss: More than ripples on a pond? Management Learning, 39, 541-560. Maurer, T. J., & Tarulli, B. A. (1994). Investigation of perceived environment, perceived outcome, and person variables in relationship to voluntary development activity by employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 3-14. McElroy, J. C., Morrow, P. C., & Rude, S. N. (2001). Turnover and organizational performance: A comparative analysis of the effects of voluntary, involuntary, and reduction-in-force turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1294-1299. McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 30-46. Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237-240. Mobley, W. H. (1982). Employee turnover: Causes, consequences, and control. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 168
Preventing Knowledge Loss When Employees Expect to Leave Mobley, W. H., Griffeth, R. W., Hand, H. H., & Meglino, B. M. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 493- 522. Moore, J. E. (2000). One road to turnover: An examination of work exhaustion in technology professionals. MIS Quarterly, 24, 141-168. Mossholder, K. W., Settoon, R. P., & Henagan, S. C. (2005). A relational perspective on turnover: Examining structural, attitudinal, and behavioral predictors. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 607-618. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5, 14-37. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford. Nonaka, I., & von Krogh, G. (2009). Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20, 635-652. O’Driscoll, M. P., & Beehr, T. A. (1994). Supervisor behaviors, role stressors, and uncertainty as predictors of personal outcomes for subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 141-154. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Podsakoff, N. P., Blume, B. D., Whiting, S. W., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 122-141. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903. 169
Page 1 and 2:
Knowledge Transfer in Teams and Its
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Contents Acknowle
Page 5 and 6:
Acknowledgements Acknowledgements T
Page 7 and 8:
Acknowledgements Last but not least
Page 9 and 10:
General Introduction and of older w
Page 11 and 12:
General Introduction in the smooth
Page 13 and 14:
Outline Outline The core of the pre
Page 15 and 16:
Outline on knowledge sharing, as we
Page 17 and 18:
Knowledge, Knowledge Management, an
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Multilevel Investigation of Anteced
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Intergenerational Knowledge Transfe
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118: Intergenerational Knowledge Transfe
Page 133 and 134: Preventing Knowledge Loss When Empl
Page 167: Preventing Knowledge Loss When Empl
Page 175 and 176: the demographic change. Accordingly
Page 177 and 178: analysis was dyadic knowledge trans
Page 179 and 180: questions. The limitations that wil
Page 181 and 182: would be very different than for a
Page 183 and 184: “there are situations where knowl
Page 185 and 186: employing the distinctions recommen
Page 187 and 188: valuable addition to the existing l
Page 189 and 190: covers a very specific area of know
Page 191 and 192: the importance of including lower l
Page 193 and 194: Foss, N. J., Husted, K., & Michailo
Page 195: Watson, S., & Hewett, K. (2006). A
show all

thesis_Daniela Noethen_print final - Jacobs University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?