thesis_Daniela Noethen_print final - Jacobs University
thesis_Daniela Noethen_print final - Jacobs University
thesis_Daniela Noethen_print final - Jacobs University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Multilevel Investigation of Antecedents of Knowledge Sharing and Seeking in Teams<br />
they found that an intrinsic motivation to learn predicted higher levels of knowledge seeking.<br />
We extended these findings by demonstrating that intrinsic benefits expected from knowledge<br />
transfer, too, have an effect on the frequency of seeking behavior, and that intrinsic<br />
motivation has an equal influence on both transfer behaviors.<br />
The influence of extrinsic benefits on knowledge transfer has been, as reported earlier, an<br />
issue of ongoing debate in the extant literature, which might be due to the mixture of<br />
knowledge transfer behaviors considered. In the present study, we demonstrate that extrinsic<br />
benefits have a strong positive effect on seeking knowledge, whereas they have no significant<br />
effect on knowledge sharing. However, since some of the studies that found positive effects<br />
exclusively dealt with knowledge sharing (and not seeking) in IT settings (Constant et al.,<br />
1996; Kankanhalli et al., 2005), this may only be one part of the story. If we consider<br />
knowledge seeking, the effect of extrinsic benefits seems rather obvious: extrinsic benefits are<br />
direct and, at least partly, lie in the knowledge that the seeker receives. Wasko and Faraj<br />
(2000), for example, discovered in their qualitative study that people participate in<br />
newsgroups mainly for the extrinsic benefits they expect to gain from this participation<br />
(access to work-relevant knowledge that is only available there, solving problems, etc.). On<br />
the other hand, for knowledge sharing, extrinsic benefits can only be expected if the transfer is<br />
visible, especially for supervisors, and can be rewarded accordingly. This applies far more to<br />
IT settings (e.g., contributing to an electronic knowledge repository), than for within-team<br />
knowledge transfer which occurs between colleagues. This difference might explain why<br />
sharing is sometimes affected by extrinsic benefits, and sometimes it is not. This question<br />
certainly merits further investigation, for which making a distinction between sharing and<br />
seeking knowledge seems to be worthwhile.<br />
Over and above these individual-level effects of motivation, we did not find a contextual<br />
effect of intrinsic motivation. Consequently, we have to assume that, again, it is rather the<br />
68