11.03.2014 Views

thesis_Daniela Noethen_print final - Jacobs University

thesis_Daniela Noethen_print final - Jacobs University

thesis_Daniela Noethen_print final - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Multilevel Investigation of Antecedents of Knowledge Sharing and Seeking in Teams<br />

they found that an intrinsic motivation to learn predicted higher levels of knowledge seeking.<br />

We extended these findings by demonstrating that intrinsic benefits expected from knowledge<br />

transfer, too, have an effect on the frequency of seeking behavior, and that intrinsic<br />

motivation has an equal influence on both transfer behaviors.<br />

The influence of extrinsic benefits on knowledge transfer has been, as reported earlier, an<br />

issue of ongoing debate in the extant literature, which might be due to the mixture of<br />

knowledge transfer behaviors considered. In the present study, we demonstrate that extrinsic<br />

benefits have a strong positive effect on seeking knowledge, whereas they have no significant<br />

effect on knowledge sharing. However, since some of the studies that found positive effects<br />

exclusively dealt with knowledge sharing (and not seeking) in IT settings (Constant et al.,<br />

1996; Kankanhalli et al., 2005), this may only be one part of the story. If we consider<br />

knowledge seeking, the effect of extrinsic benefits seems rather obvious: extrinsic benefits are<br />

direct and, at least partly, lie in the knowledge that the seeker receives. Wasko and Faraj<br />

(2000), for example, discovered in their qualitative study that people participate in<br />

newsgroups mainly for the extrinsic benefits they expect to gain from this participation<br />

(access to work-relevant knowledge that is only available there, solving problems, etc.). On<br />

the other hand, for knowledge sharing, extrinsic benefits can only be expected if the transfer is<br />

visible, especially for supervisors, and can be rewarded accordingly. This applies far more to<br />

IT settings (e.g., contributing to an electronic knowledge repository), than for within-team<br />

knowledge transfer which occurs between colleagues. This difference might explain why<br />

sharing is sometimes affected by extrinsic benefits, and sometimes it is not. This question<br />

certainly merits further investigation, for which making a distinction between sharing and<br />

seeking knowledge seems to be worthwhile.<br />

Over and above these individual-level effects of motivation, we did not find a contextual<br />

effect of intrinsic motivation. Consequently, we have to assume that, again, it is rather the<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!