thesis_Daniela Noethen_print final - Jacobs University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Multilevel Investigation of Antecedents of Knowledge Sharing and Seeking in Teams Cross, R., & Sproull, L. (2004). More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organization Science, 15, 446-462. Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50, 352-364. Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological), 39, 1-38. Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121-138. Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: Norton. Faraj, S., & Sproull, L. (2000). Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46, 1554-1568. Firebaugh, G. (1978). A rule for inferring individual-level relationships from aggregate data. American Sociological Review, 43, 557-572. Foss, N. J., Husted, K., & Michailova, S. (2010). Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: Levels of analysis, governance mechanisms, and research directions. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 455-482. Goodman, P. S., & Darr, E. D. (1998). Computer-aided systems and communities: Mechanisms for organizational learning in distributed environments. MIS Quarterly, 22, 417-440. Graham, J. W., & Donaldson, S. W. (1993). Evaluating interventions with differential attrition: The importance of nonresponse mechanisms and use of follow-up data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 119-128. 78
Multilevel Investigation of Antecedents of Knowledge Sharing and Seeking in Teams Granovetter, M. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 25-56). Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Grant, R. M. (1996), Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-122. Gray, P. H., & Meister, D. B. (2004). Knowledge sourcing effectiveness. Management Science, 50, 821-834. Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 473-496. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159-170. Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111. Hansen, M. T. (2002). Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13, 232-248. Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23, 723-744. Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. James L. R., Demaree, R. J., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Majchrzak, A. (2008). Knowledge collaboration among professionals protecting national security: Role of transactive memories in ego-centered knowledge networks. Organization Science, 19, 260-276. 79
Page 1 and 2:
Knowledge Transfer in Teams and Its
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Contents Acknowle
Page 5 and 6:
Acknowledgements Acknowledgements T
Page 7 and 8:
Acknowledgements Last but not least
Page 9 and 10:
General Introduction and of older w
Page 11 and 12:
General Introduction in the smooth
Page 13 and 14:
Outline Outline The core of the pre
Page 15 and 16:
Outline on knowledge sharing, as we
Page 17 and 18:
Knowledge, Knowledge Management, an
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28: Knowledge, Knowledge Management, an
Page 39 and 40: Multilevel Investigation of Anteced
Page 77: Multilevel Investigation of Anteced
Page 89 and 90: Intergenerational Knowledge Transfe
Page 129 and 130:
Intergenerational Knowledge Transfe
Page 131 and 132:
Intergenerational Knowledge Transfe
Page 133 and 134:
Preventing Knowledge Loss When Empl
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
the demographic change. Accordingly
Page 177 and 178:
analysis was dyadic knowledge trans
Page 179 and 180:
questions. The limitations that wil
Page 181 and 182:
would be very different than for a
Page 183 and 184:
“there are situations where knowl
Page 185 and 186:
employing the distinctions recommen
Page 187 and 188:
valuable addition to the existing l
Page 189 and 190:
covers a very specific area of know
Page 191 and 192:
the importance of including lower l
Page 193 and 194:
Foss, N. J., Husted, K., & Michailo
Page 195:
Watson, S., & Hewett, K. (2006). A
show all

thesis_Daniela Noethen_print final - Jacobs University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?