Synthesis and Structural Characterization of ... - Jacobs University
Synthesis and Structural Characterization of ... - Jacobs University
Synthesis and Structural Characterization of ... - Jacobs University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 3<br />
Unpublished Results<br />
This connectivity type <strong>of</strong> the acetate lig<strong>and</strong>s to the lanthanide centres was first reported by our<br />
group for the lanthanum-containing Wells-Dawson dimer [{La(CH 3 COO)(H 2 O) 2 (α 2 -<br />
P 2 W 17 O 61 )} 2 ] 16− which consists <strong>of</strong> two monolacunary Wells-Dawson α 2 -P 2 W 17 fragments<br />
connected by a lanthanum-acetate dimer, (La 2 (CH 3 COO)(H 2 O) 4 ) 4+ . Each La 3+ ion is ninecoordinated<br />
in a monocapped, square-antiprismatic fashion. 5a Later Mialane et al. synthesized<br />
the [{Ln(CH 3 COO)(H 2 O) 2 (α-SiW 11 O 39 )} 2 ] 12− (Ln = Gd 3+ <strong>and</strong> Yb 3+ ) type. 5b In analogy to 21–<br />
23 the Ln atoms are also eight-coordinated <strong>and</strong> have a distorted square-antiprismatic<br />
geometry. The average distance between the two lanthanide atoms in 21–23 is ca. 4.11 Å <strong>and</strong><br />
the Ln–O–Ln bridging angle is 115.76°. The average bond distances around the lanthanide<br />
centers in 21–23 can be grouped as follows: Ln–O(W) = 2.24 – 2.31 Å, Ln–O (C) = 2.42 –<br />
2.51 Å, La–O (C) = 2.41 – 2.51 Å, <strong>and</strong> La–OH 2 = 2.33 – 2.44 Å. The average bond lengths<br />
<strong>and</strong> angles <strong>of</strong> the Keggin fragment are not unusual.<br />
Interestingly synthesis <strong>of</strong> 21–23 was accomplished by reaction <strong>of</strong> Ln 3+ ions with the tri- or<br />
monovacant Keggin precursor ([A--GeW 9 O 34 ] 10− , [-GeW 11 O 39 ] 8− ). Considering that our<br />
reaction was carried out at pH 4.8 <strong>and</strong> 90°C it is not entirely unexpected that we obtained the<br />
monolacunary Keggin fragment in our product. We were also able to synthesize other<br />
lanthanide analogues <strong>of</strong> 21–23, namely [{Ln(-CH 3 COO)(H 2 O) 2 (-GeW 11 O 39 )} 2 ] 12− (Ln =<br />
Nd, Sm, Dy, Yb), based on the FTIR studies.<br />
Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were performed on the salts <strong>of</strong> 21–23 to determine<br />
the respective degree <strong>of</strong> hydration <strong>and</strong> the thermal stability. The thermograms <strong>of</strong> all three<br />
compounds showed the expected weight loss domain between 25 <strong>and</strong> 400 ºC corresponding to<br />
dehydration (lattice water molecules), see Figure 3.39. The degree <strong>of</strong> hydration was calculated<br />
for all compounds <strong>and</strong> gave 24 water molecules per formula unit for K-21 <strong>and</strong> K-22 while 18<br />
for KCsNa-23.<br />
140