AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369
AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369
AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
and done with the purpose of evolving an inclusive format that could give<br />
every state party a sense of ownership with the Code.<br />
Even as the process is important, the ICoC debates need to focus on the<br />
content and address some of the substantive issues that might need to be<br />
elaborated and clarified. Governments and analysts from around the world<br />
have expressed their opinion over the last two years on this issue. This<br />
volume is an effort to carry this debate forward. We asked over two dozen<br />
analysts and practitioners from Asia, Africa, Latin America and the West who<br />
are active in this global debate, to look at how the ICoC could be additionally<br />
refined, clarified and strengthened. This represents an important effort to<br />
bring together the diversity of opinions on this emerging global issue.<br />
As this volume shows, the Code's emphasis on non-infringement of the right<br />
of self-defence remains a major concern for a number of emerging<br />
spacefaring countries. It is unclear why the Code insists that it will not<br />
restrict the right to self-defence but it could be because it wants the most<br />
advanced space powers to be part of the Code and are afraid that these states<br />
might not join fearing restrictions on their military activities and advantages.<br />
But many countries see this right as a troublesome one and a possible<br />
legitimising of the weaponization of space. For many developing countries<br />
this right is meaningless because they are in the early stages of development<br />
of their space capabilities and find that they are simply in no position to<br />
exercise this 'right'. In addition, they do not also have the means to defend<br />
themselves against space powers with superior technologies. It must be<br />
appreciated that the EU has taken on-board this concern and has now<br />
balanced this 'right' by asking that all states should “refrain from the threat or<br />
use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any<br />
state, or in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the Charter of the<br />
United Nations.” It must be noted though that analysts from the developing<br />
world still remain sceptical on this issue.<br />
Another theme that has been commented upon is that of space debris.<br />
While the Code notes the need for states to refrain from activities that might<br />
contribute to the creation of space debris, this issue merits additional focus,<br />
as highlighted by a few authors. Focus also has to be on active debris<br />
removal measures and how international technology cooperation may be<br />
pursued with greater vigour. The authors of the chapters in the section on<br />
international cooperation emphasise this point.<br />
2 | Awaiting Launch: Perspectives on the Draft ICoC for Outer Space Activities