AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369
AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369
AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
114. Dr D F Martyn from 1962 to 1970, then Professor<br />
John Carver from 1970-1995.<br />
115. Draft International Code of Conduct for Outer Space<br />
Activities, 16 Sep 2013, p 1. Available at:<br />
http://eeas.europa.eu/non-proliferation-anddisarmament/pdf/space_code_conduct_draft_vers_<br />
16_sept_2013_en.pdf, accessed 6 Jan 2014.<br />
116. Robstock D, A Revised and Stronger International<br />
Code of Conduct for Space, Stimson Centre, 5 Nov<br />
2013, Available at:<br />
http://www.stimson.org/summaries/a-revised-andstronger-international-code-of-conduct-for-space/<br />
,<br />
accessed 6 Jan 2014.<br />
117. Triggs GD (ed), The Antarctic Treaty Regime: Law,<br />
Environment and Resources, Cambridge, New York,<br />
1987.<br />
118. In 2008 Russia and China proposed to the UN<br />
Committee on Disarmament a draft treaty aimed at<br />
Preventing an Arms Race in Outer Space (PAROS).<br />
The draft treaty has the title The Treaty on<br />
Prevention of the Placement of Weapons in Outer<br />
Space and of the Threat or Use of Force Against<br />
Outer Space Objects (PPWT). The U.S. in particular is<br />
opposed to the draft treaty as it stands and it has no<br />
prospect for adoption which this opposition<br />
remains. A principal U.S. objection to the draft<br />
treaty is that it lacks a verification regime. See for<br />
example,<br />
http://cns.miis.edu/inventory/pdfs/paros.pdf,<br />
accessed 12 Jan 2014 and Moltz JC, The politics of<br />
Space Security: Strategic Restraint and the Pursuit of<br />
National Interests, Second Edition, Stanford, 2011,<br />
pp309-310.<br />
119. With particular respect to China attention needs to<br />
be paid to questions of language and political<br />
culture. For a useful account of the pitfalls and how<br />
they may be overcome, see Gregory Kulacki,<br />
Chinese Perspectives on Transparency and Security,<br />
13 January 2003. Available at:<br />
http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_weapons_and_glo<br />
bal_security/international_information/us_china_re<br />
lations/chinese-perspectives-on.html, accessed 7<br />
Jan 2014.<br />
120. Private communications with Australian<br />
government officials.<br />
121. http://www.ga.gov.au/education/geosciencebasics/dimensions.html,<br />
accessed 7 Jan 2014.<br />
122. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/0/<br />
1647509ef7e25faaca2568a900154b63?opendocum<br />
ent, accessed 7 Jan 2014.<br />
123. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/<br />
GDP.pdf, accessed 7 Jan 2014.<br />
124. Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, Strong<br />
and Secure: A Strategy for Australia's National<br />
Security, Australian Government, Canberra, 2013, p<br />
36.<br />
125. Department of Defence, Force 2030: Defending<br />
Australia in the Asia Pacific Century, Australian<br />
Government, Canberra, 2009, para 6.13, p 47.<br />
126. A useful starting point is the report of a Manning<br />
Clark House Colloquium, held in September 2007<br />
with the title Australia as a Middle Power. See:<br />
http://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc<br />
=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCkQFjAA&url=http<br />
%3A%2F%2Fwww.aiia.asn.au%2Fnswpapers%2Fdoc_download%2F62-2007-australiasrole-as-a-middle-power-finalreport&ei=g9DLUruHE4aLkgXdmYEQ&usg=AFQjCN<br />
EHOwk8JQ5XvE0QLdlAMLwAF6sz6g&bvm=bv.5818<br />
7178,d.dGI, accessed 7 Jan 2014.<br />
127. The website of the Department of Foreign Affairs<br />
and Trade states: “Australia has contributed strongly<br />
to the development of the international law of the<br />
sea in a manner that promotes international peace<br />
and security and prosperity. In particular, we played<br />
a constructive and influential role in negotiation of<br />
the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of<br />
the Sea and its 1994 Implementing Agreement,”<br />
http://www.dfat.gov.au/un/international-law.html,<br />
accessed 7 Jan 2014.<br />
128. See for example, Australian Strategic Policy Institute,<br />
Cold Calculations: Australia's Antarctic Challenges,<br />
Strategic Insights Paper No 66, Canberra, 2013.<br />
129. See http://www.dfat.gov.au/security/ for a<br />
comprehensive accounting of Australia's<br />
involvement in nuclear non-proliferation issues,<br />
especially since the early 1970s.<br />
130. Australia has a long history of advocacy for nuclear<br />
non-proliferation and has led several initiatives to<br />
advance this cause. The country does not possess<br />
nuclear weapons and does not have a nuclear<br />
industry to speak of. Somewhat paradoxically,<br />
Australia holds a third of the world's know uranium<br />
reserves and is the world's third largest uranium<br />
producer which is all exported as uranium oxide for<br />
use in power generation. There is one nuclear<br />
reactor in Australia which is operated by the<br />
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology<br />
Organisation (ANSTO) on the south western<br />
outskirts of Sydney. ANSTO is a government<br />
organisation and the reactor produces isotopes with<br />
medical and research applications and otherwise<br />
provides the essential infrastructure to maintain a<br />
basic level of national competence about nuclear<br />
technology upon which government can draw as<br />
necessary.<br />
131. Futron Corporation, 2012 Space Competitiveness<br />
Index:A Comparative Analysis of How Countries<br />
Invest In and Benefit from Space Industry, U.S., 2012,<br />
pp 32-37.<br />
Endnotes | www.orfonline.org 237