24.04.2014 Views

AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369

AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369

AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

114. Dr D F Martyn from 1962 to 1970, then Professor<br />

John Carver from 1970-1995.<br />

115. Draft International Code of Conduct for Outer Space<br />

Activities, 16 Sep 2013, p 1. Available at:<br />

http://eeas.europa.eu/non-proliferation-anddisarmament/pdf/space_code_conduct_draft_vers_<br />

16_sept_2013_en.pdf, accessed 6 Jan 2014.<br />

116. Robstock D, A Revised and Stronger International<br />

Code of Conduct for Space, Stimson Centre, 5 Nov<br />

2013, Available at:<br />

http://www.stimson.org/summaries/a-revised-andstronger-international-code-of-conduct-for-space/<br />

,<br />

accessed 6 Jan 2014.<br />

117. Triggs GD (ed), The Antarctic Treaty Regime: Law,<br />

Environment and Resources, Cambridge, New York,<br />

1987.<br />

118. In 2008 Russia and China proposed to the UN<br />

Committee on Disarmament a draft treaty aimed at<br />

Preventing an Arms Race in Outer Space (PAROS).<br />

The draft treaty has the title The Treaty on<br />

Prevention of the Placement of Weapons in Outer<br />

Space and of the Threat or Use of Force Against<br />

Outer Space Objects (PPWT). The U.S. in particular is<br />

opposed to the draft treaty as it stands and it has no<br />

prospect for adoption which this opposition<br />

remains. A principal U.S. objection to the draft<br />

treaty is that it lacks a verification regime. See for<br />

example,<br />

http://cns.miis.edu/inventory/pdfs/paros.pdf,<br />

accessed 12 Jan 2014 and Moltz JC, The politics of<br />

Space Security: Strategic Restraint and the Pursuit of<br />

National Interests, Second Edition, Stanford, 2011,<br />

pp309-310.<br />

119. With particular respect to China attention needs to<br />

be paid to questions of language and political<br />

culture. For a useful account of the pitfalls and how<br />

they may be overcome, see Gregory Kulacki,<br />

Chinese Perspectives on Transparency and Security,<br />

13 January 2003. Available at:<br />

http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_weapons_and_glo<br />

bal_security/international_information/us_china_re<br />

lations/chinese-perspectives-on.html, accessed 7<br />

Jan 2014.<br />

120. Private communications with Australian<br />

government officials.<br />

121. http://www.ga.gov.au/education/geosciencebasics/dimensions.html,<br />

accessed 7 Jan 2014.<br />

122. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/0/<br />

1647509ef7e25faaca2568a900154b63?opendocum<br />

ent, accessed 7 Jan 2014.<br />

123. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/<br />

GDP.pdf, accessed 7 Jan 2014.<br />

124. Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, Strong<br />

and Secure: A Strategy for Australia's National<br />

Security, Australian Government, Canberra, 2013, p<br />

36.<br />

125. Department of Defence, Force 2030: Defending<br />

Australia in the Asia Pacific Century, Australian<br />

Government, Canberra, 2009, para 6.13, p 47.<br />

126. A useful starting point is the report of a Manning<br />

Clark House Colloquium, held in September 2007<br />

with the title Australia as a Middle Power. See:<br />

http://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc<br />

=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCkQFjAA&url=http<br />

%3A%2F%2Fwww.aiia.asn.au%2Fnswpapers%2Fdoc_download%2F62-2007-australiasrole-as-a-middle-power-finalreport&ei=g9DLUruHE4aLkgXdmYEQ&usg=AFQjCN<br />

EHOwk8JQ5XvE0QLdlAMLwAF6sz6g&bvm=bv.5818<br />

7178,d.dGI, accessed 7 Jan 2014.<br />

127. The website of the Department of Foreign Affairs<br />

and Trade states: “Australia has contributed strongly<br />

to the development of the international law of the<br />

sea in a manner that promotes international peace<br />

and security and prosperity. In particular, we played<br />

a constructive and influential role in negotiation of<br />

the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of<br />

the Sea and its 1994 Implementing Agreement,”<br />

http://www.dfat.gov.au/un/international-law.html,<br />

accessed 7 Jan 2014.<br />

128. See for example, Australian Strategic Policy Institute,<br />

Cold Calculations: Australia's Antarctic Challenges,<br />

Strategic Insights Paper No 66, Canberra, 2013.<br />

129. See http://www.dfat.gov.au/security/ for a<br />

comprehensive accounting of Australia's<br />

involvement in nuclear non-proliferation issues,<br />

especially since the early 1970s.<br />

130. Australia has a long history of advocacy for nuclear<br />

non-proliferation and has led several initiatives to<br />

advance this cause. The country does not possess<br />

nuclear weapons and does not have a nuclear<br />

industry to speak of. Somewhat paradoxically,<br />

Australia holds a third of the world's know uranium<br />

reserves and is the world's third largest uranium<br />

producer which is all exported as uranium oxide for<br />

use in power generation. There is one nuclear<br />

reactor in Australia which is operated by the<br />

Australian Nuclear Science and Technology<br />

Organisation (ANSTO) on the south western<br />

outskirts of Sydney. ANSTO is a government<br />

organisation and the reactor produces isotopes with<br />

medical and research applications and otherwise<br />

provides the essential infrastructure to maintain a<br />

basic level of national competence about nuclear<br />

technology upon which government can draw as<br />

necessary.<br />

131. Futron Corporation, 2012 Space Competitiveness<br />

Index:A Comparative Analysis of How Countries<br />

Invest In and Benefit from Space Industry, U.S., 2012,<br />

pp 32-37.<br />

Endnotes | www.orfonline.org 237

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!