24.04.2014 Views

AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369

AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369

AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

will bring about, directly or indirectly, damage or destruction of space<br />

objects. Nevertheless, it recognises exceptions wherein states may take such<br />

actions that may lead to the damage or destruction of space objects if that is<br />

justified by imperative safety consideration, in particular if human life or<br />

health is at risk, or in order to reduce the creation of space debris (as well as<br />

such actions justified by the Charter of the United Nation including the right<br />

to self defence – which will be discussed later).<br />

The current draft, however, fails to specifically identify what constitutes an<br />

imperative safety consideration, or how to reduce the creation of space<br />

debris. Moreover, it fails to identify who takes a decision that such conditions<br />

truly exist and what course of action is to be taken. Whilst it establishes a<br />

consultation mechanism, it remains voluntary and of an ad-hoc nature<br />

without the ability to take binding decisions.<br />

In the absence of a multilateral authority sanctioning actions for the<br />

common good, exceptions stipulated by the draft Code could be construed<br />

as a license to take unilateral actions instead of serving the aim of the Code<br />

in “creating mutual understanding and trust, helping both to prevent<br />

confrontation and foster national, regional and global security and stability”<br />

(Article 1.3 of the proposed draft). On the contrary, unilateral actions may<br />

lead to disputes (for example, disputes related to the legal ownership of<br />

space debris, especially regarding space objects that may be considered by<br />

some as space debris while claimed by others as national property that may<br />

contain sensitive material), or even actions that may be considered by some<br />

states as belligerent in nature. This is not to argue that there are no situations<br />

wherein an action might be needed or beneficial to deal with a threat, or to<br />

mitigate space debris. However, such decisions need to be taken in a proper<br />

multilateral forum and with participation of all relevant parties.<br />

International Cooperation for Debris Mitigation<br />

As discussed above, the issue of space debris is one of the major challenges<br />

that is affecting the full utilisation of outer space. Space debris already exists<br />

as a result of many decades of launching space objects. Emerging and new<br />

space faring nations thus come into the space age with the space<br />

environment under challenge, without them having contributed to the initial<br />

problem. It is thus essential for any code of conduct that deals with space<br />

debris or any other aspect of regulating the utilisation of outer space not to<br />

48 | Awaiting Launch: Perspectives on the Draft ICoC for Outer Space Activities

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!