AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369
AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369
AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
will bring about, directly or indirectly, damage or destruction of space<br />
objects. Nevertheless, it recognises exceptions wherein states may take such<br />
actions that may lead to the damage or destruction of space objects if that is<br />
justified by imperative safety consideration, in particular if human life or<br />
health is at risk, or in order to reduce the creation of space debris (as well as<br />
such actions justified by the Charter of the United Nation including the right<br />
to self defence – which will be discussed later).<br />
The current draft, however, fails to specifically identify what constitutes an<br />
imperative safety consideration, or how to reduce the creation of space<br />
debris. Moreover, it fails to identify who takes a decision that such conditions<br />
truly exist and what course of action is to be taken. Whilst it establishes a<br />
consultation mechanism, it remains voluntary and of an ad-hoc nature<br />
without the ability to take binding decisions.<br />
In the absence of a multilateral authority sanctioning actions for the<br />
common good, exceptions stipulated by the draft Code could be construed<br />
as a license to take unilateral actions instead of serving the aim of the Code<br />
in “creating mutual understanding and trust, helping both to prevent<br />
confrontation and foster national, regional and global security and stability”<br />
(Article 1.3 of the proposed draft). On the contrary, unilateral actions may<br />
lead to disputes (for example, disputes related to the legal ownership of<br />
space debris, especially regarding space objects that may be considered by<br />
some as space debris while claimed by others as national property that may<br />
contain sensitive material), or even actions that may be considered by some<br />
states as belligerent in nature. This is not to argue that there are no situations<br />
wherein an action might be needed or beneficial to deal with a threat, or to<br />
mitigate space debris. However, such decisions need to be taken in a proper<br />
multilateral forum and with participation of all relevant parties.<br />
International Cooperation for Debris Mitigation<br />
As discussed above, the issue of space debris is one of the major challenges<br />
that is affecting the full utilisation of outer space. Space debris already exists<br />
as a result of many decades of launching space objects. Emerging and new<br />
space faring nations thus come into the space age with the space<br />
environment under challenge, without them having contributed to the initial<br />
problem. It is thus essential for any code of conduct that deals with space<br />
debris or any other aspect of regulating the utilisation of outer space not to<br />
48 | Awaiting Launch: Perspectives on the Draft ICoC for Outer Space Activities