24.04.2014 Views

AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369

AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369

AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

All this means that if the Code is adopted by the U.S., regulations from the<br />

Executive branch and its agencies, which will be legally binding upon the<br />

agencies and non-governmental entities of the U.S., will be implemented<br />

along with practices to fulfill assurances within the Code. The question is<br />

whether compliance with the assurances of the Code could inadvertently<br />

create customary international law.<br />

Customary International Law and the Code<br />

Customary international law is defined as international obligations arising<br />

from established state practice, as opposed to obligations arising from formal<br />

written international treaties. It consists of two components. First, there<br />

must be a general and consistent practice of states. This does not mean that<br />

the practice must be universally followed; rather it should reflect wide<br />

acceptance among states particularly involved in the relevant activity. Second,<br />

there must be a sense of legal obligation, or opiniojurissivenecessitatis. In<br />

other words, a practice that is generally followed but which states feel legally<br />

free to disregard does not contribute to customary law; rather, there must be<br />

a sense of legal obligation to the international community. States must follow<br />

the practice because they believe it is required by international law, not merely<br />

because that they think it is a good idea, or politically useful, or otherwise<br />

46<br />

desirable.<br />

The definition of customary international law is nuanced because not all<br />

states are equal when considering whether a state's practice and<br />

opiniojurissivenecessitatis reaches the level of customary international law.<br />

State practice and opiniojurissivenecessitatis of states such as the U.S., which<br />

holds a special place and position of prestige in the field of outer space<br />

activities, will be given more weight than a state that has a fledgling space<br />

programme and would be more likely considered to be customary<br />

international law than those of a state with a nascent space programme.<br />

The spectre of the Code becoming customary international law is not a<br />

trivial matter. There are significant assurances in the Code that could be<br />

problematic for international space law and U.S.' space policy should it be<br />

deemed to be custom. One problem could arise in the context of the Outer<br />

47<br />

Space Treaty (OST) and specifically with Article IX. Article IX is an elusive<br />

precept in the OST in that it has yet to be put into practice and given<br />

48<br />

customary usage. The Code as drafted contains many requirements<br />

56 | Awaiting Launch: Perspectives on the Draft ICoC for Outer Space Activities

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!