AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369
AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369
AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
All this means that if the Code is adopted by the U.S., regulations from the<br />
Executive branch and its agencies, which will be legally binding upon the<br />
agencies and non-governmental entities of the U.S., will be implemented<br />
along with practices to fulfill assurances within the Code. The question is<br />
whether compliance with the assurances of the Code could inadvertently<br />
create customary international law.<br />
Customary International Law and the Code<br />
Customary international law is defined as international obligations arising<br />
from established state practice, as opposed to obligations arising from formal<br />
written international treaties. It consists of two components. First, there<br />
must be a general and consistent practice of states. This does not mean that<br />
the practice must be universally followed; rather it should reflect wide<br />
acceptance among states particularly involved in the relevant activity. Second,<br />
there must be a sense of legal obligation, or opiniojurissivenecessitatis. In<br />
other words, a practice that is generally followed but which states feel legally<br />
free to disregard does not contribute to customary law; rather, there must be<br />
a sense of legal obligation to the international community. States must follow<br />
the practice because they believe it is required by international law, not merely<br />
because that they think it is a good idea, or politically useful, or otherwise<br />
46<br />
desirable.<br />
The definition of customary international law is nuanced because not all<br />
states are equal when considering whether a state's practice and<br />
opiniojurissivenecessitatis reaches the level of customary international law.<br />
State practice and opiniojurissivenecessitatis of states such as the U.S., which<br />
holds a special place and position of prestige in the field of outer space<br />
activities, will be given more weight than a state that has a fledgling space<br />
programme and would be more likely considered to be customary<br />
international law than those of a state with a nascent space programme.<br />
The spectre of the Code becoming customary international law is not a<br />
trivial matter. There are significant assurances in the Code that could be<br />
problematic for international space law and U.S.' space policy should it be<br />
deemed to be custom. One problem could arise in the context of the Outer<br />
47<br />
Space Treaty (OST) and specifically with Article IX. Article IX is an elusive<br />
precept in the OST in that it has yet to be put into practice and given<br />
48<br />
customary usage. The Code as drafted contains many requirements<br />
56 | Awaiting Launch: Perspectives on the Draft ICoC for Outer Space Activities