AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369

eyond disarmament issues. Therefore, it would be logical if the line of
particularly peaceful uses of outer space was clearly tracked in the title and
provisions of ICoC.
We consider the ICoC to be a voluntary and legally non-binding instrument.
In this regard, we emphasise the fact that ICoC should be based on broad
consensus, as its implementation, in particular, and effectiveness will depend
entirely on the goodwill of the Subscribing States. It is essential to ensure the
acceptability of ICoC for the largest possible number of states.
Taking into account the non-binding nature of ICoC, we consider the
undisputed fact that ICoC provisions should neither extend beyond the
framework of the existing international treaties on peaceful exploration and
use of outer space inanycasenor should it contradict the framework.
Also, in our opinion, it is necessary to focus on the organisational aspects of
ICoC implementation. This primarily relates to the definition of the
conditions under which the first Meeting of the Subscribing States must be
held (eg.: presence of a certain number of signatories). Also, it is necessary to
consider deeply the activities of the Central Point of Contact as the
secretariat of the Meeting of the Subscribing States (especially financial and
organisational aspects).
158 | Awaiting Launch: Perspectives on the Draft ICoC for Outer Space Activities