24.04.2014 Views

AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369

AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369

AwaitingLaunch_1397728623369

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sputnik in 1957. However, since the technology was in the nascent stage of<br />

development then, the perceptions in regard to space security were probably<br />

not yet fully evolved. Nuclear issues being the cornerstone of security in that<br />

era, activities in outer space were viewed under the limited nuclear prism.<br />

Hence, early proposals with regard to devising a mechanism for space<br />

security have a nuclear backdrop. The proposals for prohibiting the use of<br />

space for military usage and the placement of Weapons of Mass Destruction<br />

(WMD) in space were deliberated in the late 1950s and early 1960s by the<br />

UN.<br />

Shortly after the launch of the first satellite Sputnik, the UN formulated a<br />

Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) during 1958-59<br />

to address various issues ranging from international collaboration and<br />

research to legal aspects and monitoring the track of objects launched in<br />

orbit. Subsequently, five treaty mechanisms were put in place, which address<br />

core issues concerning various space matters. They include the Outer Space<br />

Treaty (OST, 1967), the Astronaut Rescue Agreement (1968), the Liability<br />

Convention (1972), the Registration Convention (1975) and the Moon<br />

Agreement (1979). Now, three decades after the last treaty mechanism was<br />

put in place, a serious effort has begun to put together a globally accepted<br />

formulation to realise space security in the form of the International Space<br />

Code of Conduct (CoC). It is likely that this CoC would be put in place<br />

shortly with a majority of stakeholders accepting it.<br />

As part of the debate to assess the draft of CoC (version September 16,<br />

2013), it could be also useful to compare and contrast it with the already<br />

available mechanisms in the space domain. It may not be feasible to<br />

undertake an explicit content comparison because most of the available<br />

mechanisms are for a specified area and CoC covers a wider canvas.<br />

However, it could be useful to appreciate the overall comprehensive<br />

approaches behind formulating such mechanisms.<br />

Till the 1980s, various treaty mechanisms were formulated to address various<br />

issues concerning space technology management. However, all these efforts<br />

were inadequate to ban space weapons. OST, which could be viewed as a<br />

more compressive space treaty among the group of five, also limits itself,<br />

making provisions only to ban the deployment of WMDs in outer space.<br />

Hence, post-1980, few serious efforts have been made to bring together<br />

various stakeholders on a common platform to debate this issue. One such<br />

76 | Awaiting Launch: Perspectives on the Draft ICoC for Outer Space Activities

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!