28.04.2014 Views

MSHA HANDBOOK SERIES - PH13-V-1 - Mine Safety and Health ...

MSHA HANDBOOK SERIES - PH13-V-1 - Mine Safety and Health ...

MSHA HANDBOOK SERIES - PH13-V-1 - Mine Safety and Health ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH<br />

GENERAL INSPECTION PROCEDURES <strong>HANDBOOK</strong> CHAPTER 3<br />

copy shall be given to the miner violating the statutory provision. A copy shall<br />

also be provided to the operator.<br />

Special assessment under Section 110(g) of the <strong>Mine</strong> Act is m<strong>and</strong>atory for the<br />

violations cited to miners related to smoking or the carrying of smoking<br />

materials.<br />

15. Petitions for Modification. Inspectors should identify all granted petitions for<br />

modification when reviewing the UMF <strong>and</strong> evaluate them during the regular<br />

inspection to determine if they are still warranted. If the final order requires<br />

revisions to be implemented into the operator’s training plan, a review of the<br />

training plan(s) should be conducted to assure those provisions have been<br />

implemented <strong>and</strong> approved. The inspector(s), through their supervisor, should<br />

notify the District Manager if a granted modification is no longer appropriate or<br />

is not in use, in which case it should be considered for revocation. <strong>Mine</strong>s which<br />

are permanently ab<strong>and</strong>oned <strong>and</strong> sealed should initiate the revocation process.<br />

(Refer to the Petitions for Modification H<strong>and</strong>book for further guidance.)<br />

Documentation Required: If the inspector determines that granted modifications are<br />

no longer appropriate or not in use, inspectors shall indicate on the inspector’s<br />

certification form that the modification should be considered for revocation. Otherwise,<br />

the inspectors’ documentation that the UMF was reviewed will suffice.<br />

16. Review of Training Plans <strong>and</strong> Training Records. The inspector shall review a<br />

representative number of training records (at least 10%) of all persons working<br />

at the mine. If the review indicates 25% of the records reviewed have<br />

deficiencies, then additional records shall be reviewed. If a 104(g) order is<br />

issued, an Educational Field Services Specialist should conduct a follow-up, <strong>and</strong><br />

review each applicable approved training record for compliance with applicable<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> approved plans. This inspection shall include all applicable Part<br />

48 Subpart A, Part 48 Subpart B, Part 75, <strong>and</strong> Part 77 approved plans to<br />

reasonably assure that proper training was given to the miners in accordance<br />

with the operator’s approved plans. A thorough review of the training plans in<br />

the UMF should be conducted before going to the mine.<br />

The inspector shall:<br />

a. Try to obtain a list of employees from the mine operator <strong>and</strong> contractor (if<br />

applicable) containing names of employees, their hire date <strong>and</strong> classification;<br />

b. Review the required number of <strong>MSHA</strong> Form 5000-23s or equivalent<br />

approved form for completeness, including date, type of training, signature<br />

of company representative, mine ID, address, etc., for a two-year period;<br />

Release 1 (February 2013) 3-18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!