30.05.2014 Views

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

permitted to become king; however, since the Hasmonean Antigonus was just as impossible as<br />

a human being, his children should then have received the crown (section 489). In light of such<br />

an opinion, it is with a certain suspense that one will examine how <strong>Josephus</strong> comes to terms in<br />

the Antiquities with the problem of the bellicose dispute between Herod and Antigonus. On the<br />

whole, <strong>Josephus</strong> remodelled very little here, even the stylistic execution of the details has<br />

hardly been altered; here as well one receives the impression that <strong>Josephus</strong>’ creative power<br />

was somehow weakened; all the more significant are the few small changes that <strong>Josephus</strong><br />

introduced, namely to the detriment of Antigonus.<br />

While Antigonus besieges the Herodians in Masada, they almost had to surrender for<br />

lack of water. In the final night, however, it begins to rain and so the fortress can continue<br />

intact. <strong>The</strong> Herodians are victorious during sallies; at times they are forced back as well. In this<br />

report from War 286 - 287, [the version in] Ant. 391 includes that the sudden rain was perceived<br />

as a divine sign; therefore God contends against Antigonus. One must bear in mind along with<br />

this that immediately following, in the description of the engagements during the sallies<br />

[Ausfallsgefechte], the advantages that Antigonus had won now and then according to the War<br />

are deleted. – War 304 reported that the watchmen had fled from Sepphoris, in Ant. 414<br />

<strong>Josephus</strong> specifies that it was Antigonus’ guard detachment, who ran off. Most notably,<br />

however, the brief expansion in 418 is connected with this unfavourable view of Antigonus.<br />

<strong>The</strong> War had related the vacillating attitude of the Roman commander Silo, who<br />

admittedly was instructed by the Roman government to support Herod, but who did this only<br />

with reluctance since he was bribed by Antigonus. Silo admittedly took part in the siege of<br />

Jerusalem (294), however, he created such difficulties over the food supplies that it was<br />

concluded that he had been bribed by Antigonus (297). <strong>The</strong>se difficulties were well resolved<br />

yet so much time had been lost that the siege could not be brought to an end in the summer.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Roman army moved into winter quarters in Herod’s territory, however, [201] Antigonus<br />

once again managed to attract a part of the Roman army to his [side] through bribery (302).<br />

<strong>The</strong>n in the next spring, when Silo and Herod received orders to pacify Judaea first and then to<br />

prepare for the campaign against the Parthians, Herod understandably “gladly” dispensed<br />

with the assistance of Silo who was so unreliable and sent him to Bassus while he conducted<br />

the battle against the Jews by himself alone (section 309). In comparison to this, the Antiquities<br />

enriched the presentation by one trait: namely, in the winter quarters food was provided for<br />

176

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!