30.05.2014 Views

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

has been consulted here as well, as is proven by a reworking that became necessary because of<br />

the expansion. In the War, Herod received the thanks and the support of Antony due to the fact<br />

that he distinguished himself during the assault on Samosata by his outstanding courage and<br />

in this way assisted the Romans most vigorously (322). In contrast to this, Ant. 440 ff. has Herod<br />

distinguish himself already on the march to Antony to such an extent that Antony, who heard<br />

about this, [206] honoured Herod on account of these achievements (446). <strong>The</strong>n, when<br />

Samosata had indeed fallen, the Antiquities, which had anticipated the honours, could do<br />

nothing else other than attach Antony’s order to Sossius to support Herod (447) from the later<br />

contents of War 327, so that another acknowledgement of Herod would [result] from this.<br />

<strong>The</strong> additional source [Nebenquelle] used here is characterized once again by precise<br />

knowledge about the twists of fate in Herod’s life [Lebensschicksale], his movements during the<br />

march, etc.; its sympathies lie with Herod, in short, it is the same trend that we have already<br />

had to identify frequently and whose origin will lie in Herod’s memoirs. As regards the factual<br />

relationship of this additional source [Nebenquelle] to Nicolaus, in his more succinct<br />

presentation the latter obviously transferred the merits, which Herod in truth acquired for<br />

himself during the march, to the time directly before the assault; for it is obvious that Nicolaus<br />

with his thought πολλοὺς μὲν τῶν βαρβάρων ἀποκτείνας, πολλὴν δὲ ἀποτεμόμεvος λείαν has<br />

alluded to that very incident, which the additional source [Nebenquelle] Ant 440 ff. has<br />

recounted more thoroughly and correctly. So it is then definite once again that the War has not<br />

condensed, rather the Antiquities has expanded.<br />

This relationship between the two writings, which we have now proven in countless<br />

cases, also exists in that very segment, which Destinon (page 15), who thought he could prove<br />

the opposite, wished to present as particularly instructive for his interpretation: now<br />

supported by the Romans again, Herod, who wishes to conquer Judaea, assembles 800 allies in<br />

Lebanon, – so reads War 329 – draws a Roman legion to himself in that location and marches<br />

into Galilee with these [troops]. In contrast to this, Ant 452 mentions Ptolemais in addition as<br />

one of their destinations. At first glance, this certainly seems to represent an element of a<br />

common source, which has been better preserved in the Antiquities; but one must not consider<br />

this discrepancy in isolation; on the contrary, it also forms an element of the systematic<br />

reworking of the entire passage. <strong>The</strong> War builds its report upon the idea that Herod turned<br />

against his brother’s murderers in the greatest haste: When he receives the news of his<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!