30.05.2014 Views

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

corrected accordingly.<br />

16. <strong>The</strong> conquest of Jerusalem<br />

War 343 - 357 = Ant. 465 - 491<br />

After his decisive victory over Antigonus, Herod advances to Jerusalem and conquers<br />

the town after a rather lengthy siege. <strong>The</strong> report about this, as it is given in Ant. 14.470 - 481,<br />

coincides substantially with War 347 - 353, but differs in comparison by a series of details that<br />

must be investigated collectively. In the first instance, the comments [in] 476b - 478 have no<br />

model antecedent in the War where, rather, the information about the scaling of the walls by<br />

Sossius is directly followed by the account about the battle in the town (350). <strong>The</strong> part of the<br />

Antiquities lying in between deals with the length of the battle for the “first” and “ second” wall<br />

(40 and 15 days respectively), then it relates that Herod, in order to malign Antigonus, alleged<br />

that the latter has had some of the temple halls set on fire. After the fall of the outer temple<br />

and the lower city the Jews fled into the inner sanctuary and the upper city. Since they were<br />

lacking animals for the daily offerings, they had requested of [211] Herod that [he grant] these<br />

same [animals] entry, and he made this concession to them with the assumption that they<br />

would now surrender. But since they did not do this, but rather they continued to fight for<br />

Antigonus, so Herod took the town by force.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re can be no doubt at all now that here we have an insertion into the Antiquities, and<br />

not some condensation of a common original text in the War. <strong>The</strong> evidence is supplied by [the<br />

fact] that we already find the fate of the town sealed in [section] 476a with the scaling of the<br />

town walls; by contrast, the expositions about the Jews’ offerings hark back to the past, and<br />

consequently, in order to effect the continuation the author must again first create the doublet<br />

in 478 προσβαλὼν κατὰ κράτος εἴλεν τὴν πόλιν to the [phrase] in 476 ἀναβαίνουσιν δὲ ἐπὶ τὸ<br />

τεῖχος. <strong>The</strong> insertion is based on good tradition, as is evidenced by the details about the length<br />

of the battle for the two town walls. But it is precisely these details that stand in direct<br />

contradiction to the account of War 351 that the battle for Jerusalem lasted five months; and<br />

precisely because <strong>Josephus</strong> himself also deemed these two sets of information to be<br />

incompatible, he deleted the information about the five months from the Antiquities where he<br />

interlaced the details from the new source about the battle for the two walls, [which lasted] 55<br />

185

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!