30.05.2014 Views

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the old administrative report [in] Life 28/29: the principal men of Jerusalem had found out that<br />

“the robbers” had weapons at their disposal. Since they (sc. the principal men of Jerusalem)<br />

were for their part unarmed, they were afraid of being subjected to these opponents and [104]<br />

for that reason they sent <strong>Josephus</strong> to Galilee with two other priests, Joazar and Judas, with the<br />

mandate to convince these fellows to lay down their arms. It is seen clearly that the enemies of<br />

Jerusalem are not the Romans but “the robbers”; protection from them is desired; for that<br />

reason a legation consisting of three priests is sent to them; for it is indeed clear that [the<br />

person] who has the mandate to persuade the robbers to lay down their arms is not a<br />

commander but an envoy. <strong>The</strong>refore, according to Life 28/29, <strong>Josephus</strong> set foot in Galilee not as<br />

commander in the <strong>Jewish</strong>-Roman War but as an envoy [sent] to the robbers. It also<br />

corresponds completely to this situation when <strong>Josephus</strong> says about himself in section 65 that<br />

he was sent off as envoy (ὑπὸ τοῦ κοινοῦ τῶν Ἱεροσολυμιτῶν πρεσβεύσων μετὰ τούτων<br />

πεπόμφθαι πρὸς αὐτούς), and he then refers three times to his fellow envoys Joazar and Judas<br />

as συμπρέσβεις (63; 73; 77). At first <strong>Josephus</strong> also manifestly conducts the negotiations with the<br />

robbers entirely in accordance with the directive that he had been issued in Jerusalem (section<br />

77 ff.). He must certainly realize in so doing that the disarming planned in Jerusalem is<br />

impossible; instead of this he attempted to make the robbers harmless by inducing the<br />

Galileans to pay them fees, in return for which the robbers were to promise to set foot on<br />

Galilean territory only when they were summoned or when they did not receive their fees.<br />

<strong>Josephus</strong> thereupon dismisses the robbers with the strict order that they are not to wage war<br />

with either the Romans or with the surrounding inhabitants; because he was concerned<br />

above all that peace should reign in Galilee (78).<br />

Whoever proceeds from the views of the War or the added segments must again be<br />

amazed. <strong>The</strong> commander, who is to prepare for the war against Rome, sees his principal duty<br />

as keeping robbers, whom he cannot disarm, away from his province and – the Romans – by<br />

payment. One would perhaps like to imagine that he wished in this way to prevent a<br />

premature attack on the Romans, but this is contradicted not only by the designation of the<br />

robbers as enemies (28/29), but even more so [by the fact that] the report 70 ff. actually makes<br />

such considerations irrelevant; because here John of Gischala requests that <strong>Josephus</strong> and his<br />

fellow envoys hand over the grain that is being stored in Upper Galilee. [105] <strong>Josephus</strong> refuses<br />

delivery because he intended to keep the grain either for himself or – for the Romans. <strong>Josephus</strong><br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!