30.05.2014 Views

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the war against Rome and that it was by virtue of this official position of his that he organized<br />

this Roman war.<br />

All the passages quoted here – as well as those where the concept of the <strong>Jewish</strong> War is<br />

specifically mentioned (page 99 ff.) and also those in which it is tacitly assumed (page 100 ff.) –<br />

belong to the added segments by means of which <strong>Josephus</strong> shaped his old administrative<br />

report into the Life in its current version. It is evident that in these [passages] there is<br />

absolutely no expression of the wish to cover up <strong>Josephus</strong>’ position as leader. Quite [103] to<br />

the contrary, insertions such as those of 188 or 208 - 210 make it obvious that <strong>Josephus</strong><br />

actually wished at that time to underscore his leading position in the war<br />

against Rome. So the error of the modern opinion that claimed to perceive a<br />

subsequent cover-up by <strong>Josephus</strong> (cf. page 8) becomes evident here as well; in<br />

truth the exact opposite is correct: the old report is silent about [<strong>Josephus</strong>’]<br />

leadership position against Rome, which was later underscored.<br />

<strong>The</strong> stance in which <strong>Josephus</strong> appears in the added segments now agrees fully with<br />

the image that is portrayed in the parallel source, the War, and which has been adopted from<br />

there into the modern literature. <strong>The</strong> main features are universally known from there:<br />

<strong>Josephus</strong> does not have much confidence in the outcome of the war and therefore initially tries<br />

to calm things down, together with the high priests. When this fails, he makes himself<br />

available to the movement and is appointed as the governor of Galilee for the war. In this<br />

position he organizes the rebellion, fortifies places and trains troops. He eliminates the<br />

opposition that he encounters in so doing, [and is] pervaded by [a sense of] the magnitude of<br />

his task. <strong>Josephus</strong> has set down this view in the War as well as in the added segments of the<br />

Life; hence it unfolds that this view remained unchanged for him from the recording of the<br />

War, i.e. in the middle of the 70s, up to the period of time after 100. It is all the more significant<br />

that the core segments of the Life, i.e. the old report about <strong>Josephus</strong>’ deeds in Galilee, yield a<br />

completely different picture, which at the same time makes it understandable to us how it<br />

happens that <strong>Josephus</strong> is silent about his leadership position in the conflict against Rome in<br />

this [writing].<br />

In War 2.568, and correspondingly in the added segment Life 341, <strong>Josephus</strong> says that he<br />

was appointed as the commander of Galilee for the Roman war by the community of the<br />

inhabitants of Jerusalem; however, another view is found right at the beginning (cf. page 54) of<br />

92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!