30.05.2014 Views

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sections in comparison with War I, but also [the attitude] towards Tiberias. This town has<br />

played absolutely no role in our context as yet; now all at once the town is brought up in the<br />

added segments and its inhabitants are characterized in such a way that <strong>Josephus</strong>’ opinion of<br />

them leaves no doubt: <strong>The</strong> Tiberians, thus reads War 2.606, wish to appropriate the stolen<br />

goods; it is they who, in contrast to the Taricheans, revile and threaten <strong>Josephus</strong> (608). This<br />

passage is especially indicative because “the people from the countryside” were named instead<br />

of the Tiberians in the passage according to which 608 was shaped, namely 602. Now, <strong>Josephus</strong>’<br />

attitude towards the town of Tiberias had completely shifted during the course of his life, as<br />

already mentioned (page 70; cf. 84 ff.). Whereas he adopted a friendly bearing towards Tiberias<br />

while composing War I and always stressed their mutual agreement, both earlier and later he<br />

persecuted the town of Tiberias with fierce animosity. We distinctly encounter this sentiment<br />

especially in the added segment War 2.602 - 608, which is precisely where his pronounced<br />

stance against Agrippa is also most noticeable. Conversely, the Taricheans [76] are highly<br />

featured in 606, and it is in their honour that the insertions, discussed above on page 70, are<br />

integrated into 602 and 608; [these insertions] are to emphasize <strong>Josephus</strong>’ close rapport with<br />

Tarichea: When <strong>Josephus</strong> recorded his War, he was acting in honour of Agrippa<br />

and the town of Tiberias patronized by the latter; on the other hand he<br />

persecuted Tarichea, which was hostile to Agrippa and the Romans. Later on,<br />

this entire relationship was reversed: <strong>Josephus</strong> moved away from Agrippa,<br />

[and] consequently censured Tiberias and praised Tarichea. And it is precisely<br />

this sentiment that we encounter with total clarity in the insertion War 2.602 -<br />

608; it therefore originates from a much later period than the first draft of the<br />

War.<br />

Consequently, when <strong>Josephus</strong> wished to have his attitude to Agrippa, the Tiberians and<br />

the Taricheans be understood as modified for reasons that are to be discussed elsewhere, he<br />

brought forth his War and inserted passages into it which were to take his new sentiment into<br />

account. According to War I, the split between the opponents resulted from [the fact] that<br />

<strong>Josephus</strong> presented himself to the crowd in the demeanour of one who was distraught and part<br />

of the crowd thereupon sided with him, and part against him, so that <strong>Josephus</strong>, relying upon<br />

his newly won adherents, was able to speak frankly and promise the fortification first of<br />

Tarichea and then of the other towns. <strong>Josephus</strong> now makes the fortification of the towns as the<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!