19.06.2014 Views

Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

S A C R A M E N T O A R E A B I C Y C L E A D V O C A T E S<br />

January 9, 2012<br />

Sacramento Area Council of Governments<br />

SACOG Board of Directors<br />

SACOG, <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> 2035<br />

1415 L Street, Suite 300<br />

Sacramento, CA 95814<br />

Subject: <strong>Draft</strong> <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> 2035 and <strong>Draft</strong> EIR on <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> 2035<br />

Dear SACOG Board of Directors and Executive Director Mike McKeever:<br />

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on both the <strong>Draft</strong> <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> 2035<br />

and its <strong>Draft</strong> EIR. We applaud SACOG for the extraordinary effort that has<br />

gone into conducting the analyses underlying the <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> and in<br />

presenting extensive amounts of information to the public. Particularly<br />

impressive was the advance in integrating land-use and transportation<br />

planning.<br />

We appreciate that per capita funding for bike/pedestrian projects has<br />

increased by 7% since the last <strong>MTP</strong> and that many of the roadway<br />

maintenance and rehabilitation projects are to include bike and pedestrian<br />

facilities. However, we are concerned by the very small increase in<br />

bike/pedestrian mode share that is projected over the 27-yr life of the plan<br />

(e.g. non-commute bike/pedestrian mode-share increases only from 10.6%<br />

to 12.1%; see Table 5C.7). Figure 5C.6 shows that the <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> 2035 does<br />

not accelerate the growth trend of historical “bike+walk” person trips between<br />

2008 and 2035.<br />

We understand that the <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> is a forecast, not a regulatory program.<br />

The <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> stands, however, as a valuable planning and implementation<br />

tool that can have great impact on actual conditions for bicyclists and<br />

pedestrians. Additionally, it guides the nature of projects that will be funded<br />

by SACOG. We have 3 key recommendations for improving the <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong><br />

2035 for bicycling in the region:<br />

1. We suggest that the <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> 2035 state an ambitious goal for<br />

bike/pedestrian mode-share of 20% for non-commute trips by 2035<br />

to reflect the broad and direct importance of non-vehicular travel options<br />

for improving community health, travel safety, air quality, energy<br />

efficiency, and overall mobility of all transportation-system users. In<br />

stating an ambitious goal for mode-share increase, the <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> 2035<br />

should focus on planning and investing in bicycle and pedestrian<br />

Page 128 of 165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!