Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog
Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog
Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
S A C R A M E N T O A R E A B I C Y C L E A D V O C A T E S<br />
January 9, 2012<br />
Sacramento Area Council of Governments<br />
SACOG Board of Directors<br />
SACOG, <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> 2035<br />
1415 L Street, Suite 300<br />
Sacramento, CA 95814<br />
Subject: <strong>Draft</strong> <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> 2035 and <strong>Draft</strong> EIR on <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> 2035<br />
Dear SACOG Board of Directors and Executive Director Mike McKeever:<br />
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on both the <strong>Draft</strong> <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> 2035<br />
and its <strong>Draft</strong> EIR. We applaud SACOG for the extraordinary effort that has<br />
gone into conducting the analyses underlying the <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> and in<br />
presenting extensive amounts of information to the public. Particularly<br />
impressive was the advance in integrating land-use and transportation<br />
planning.<br />
We appreciate that per capita funding for bike/pedestrian projects has<br />
increased by 7% since the last <strong>MTP</strong> and that many of the roadway<br />
maintenance and rehabilitation projects are to include bike and pedestrian<br />
facilities. However, we are concerned by the very small increase in<br />
bike/pedestrian mode share that is projected over the 27-yr life of the plan<br />
(e.g. non-commute bike/pedestrian mode-share increases only from 10.6%<br />
to 12.1%; see Table 5C.7). Figure 5C.6 shows that the <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> 2035 does<br />
not accelerate the growth trend of historical “bike+walk” person trips between<br />
2008 and 2035.<br />
We understand that the <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> is a forecast, not a regulatory program.<br />
The <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> stands, however, as a valuable planning and implementation<br />
tool that can have great impact on actual conditions for bicyclists and<br />
pedestrians. Additionally, it guides the nature of projects that will be funded<br />
by SACOG. We have 3 key recommendations for improving the <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong><br />
2035 for bicycling in the region:<br />
1. We suggest that the <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> 2035 state an ambitious goal for<br />
bike/pedestrian mode-share of 20% for non-commute trips by 2035<br />
to reflect the broad and direct importance of non-vehicular travel options<br />
for improving community health, travel safety, air quality, energy<br />
efficiency, and overall mobility of all transportation-system users. In<br />
stating an ambitious goal for mode-share increase, the <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> 2035<br />
should focus on planning and investing in bicycle and pedestrian<br />
Page 128 of 165