19.06.2014 Views

Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

should also recognize the many other benefits of Complete Streets such as<br />

improving community health and safety, energy efficiency, travel mobility, and air<br />

quality.<br />

We believe this is best accomplished through a stand-alone policy under the policy<br />

category of Land Use and Environmental Sustainability to address ways to greatly<br />

expand Complete Streets in the SACOG region. An expanded policy should<br />

recognize the many co-benefits of making streets safe and desirable for all<br />

travel modes. We recommend the Complete Streets policy include these<br />

specific strategies:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Establish a definition for what would qualify any street to be a complete<br />

street (using multi-modal level of service estimates),<br />

Develop a goal for what proportion of a jurisdiction’s surface streets<br />

should ultimately qualify as Complete Streets (we believe this proportion<br />

should be near 100%),<br />

Establish a timetable by when local jurisdictions and the region will<br />

achieve specified proportions of making all streets complete (perhaps 50% of<br />

potential streets complete by 2025 and 100% by 2035),<br />

Develop and promote a template for local jurisdictions to use in<br />

considering how to make any surface street into a Complete Street, either<br />

during construction or as part of maintenance and rehabilitation,<br />

Offer incentives, both technical and financial, to encourage local<br />

jurisdictions to upgrade their surface streets into Complete Streets, and<br />

Review and comment on transportation project designs to enhance their<br />

complete-street qualifications.<br />

1. The <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> 2035 should invest in planning and implementing continuous<br />

and direct bike networks between key destinations to promote local circulation<br />

within Community Types that have greater land-use densities. Because of higher<br />

densities, the Center, Corridor, and Established Community Types have the greatest<br />

potentials for substantial increases in bike mode share.<br />

Much of Policy 29 (in Chapter 6) encompasses strategies to invest in connectivity for<br />

local and regional circulation. We recommend that an additional strategy be<br />

adopted to support Policy 29 that aims to define how a bike network for local<br />

circulation can qualify as safe, comfortable, continuous, and direct for<br />

potential bike riders of all ages and abilities.<br />

Bike networks are safe and desirable for riders of all ages and capabilities (from<br />

school children to grandparents) when they consist of bikeways that have low traffic<br />

volumes and speeds and are continuous and direct between key destinations. Such<br />

networks can be comprised of combinations of Class I paths, Class II lanes, and<br />

Class III routes but they also have special protection for bicyclists when crossing<br />

Page 130 of 165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!