Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Lincoln Community Meeting <strong>Comments</strong> from January 9, 2012 Ruth Crone Is this a map of what you want it to look like in the future or what you want it to look like now? Question specific of rural residential communities in Yolo County. What is the difference between current map and the map you want us to be on? Map is still assuming that our region will be growing. Heard several references to state and federal statutes, and legal foundation at SACOG, asked if SACOG staff could elaborate so public could understand. SACOG and its plan create another level of separation because local jurisdictions joined into this regional function with support of state and federal government in some cases. The comments here are summaries of the oral testimonies provided at this public meeting.
Colfax City Council Meeting <strong>Comments</strong> from February 8, 2012 Neil Wilson Concerned about loss of private property rights, freedom and judgment with everything being planned by government. The comments here are summaries of the oral testimonies provided at this public meeting.
Page 1 and 2:
Page 1 of 1 What are you commenting
Page 3 and 4:
Page 1 of 1 eircomments sacog - Dav
Page 5 and 6:
file://C:\Documents and Settings\CH
Page 7 and 8:
Roseville Public Hearing Comments f
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Coalition on Regional Equity MTP/SC
Page 17 and 18:
Coalition on Regional Equity MTP/SC
Page 19 and 20:
Page 19 of 165
Page 21 and 22:
Page 21 of 165
Page 23 and 24:
Page 23 of 165
Page 25 and 26:
Page 25 of 165
Page 27 and 28:
Page 27 of 165
Page 29 and 30:
Sacramento Public Hearing Comments
Page 31 and 32:
909 12 th Street Sacramento, CA 958
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 35 of 165
Page 37 and 38:
Sacramento Area Council of Governme
Page 39 and 40:
SCS Health & Equity Metrics August
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
The effort was funded by the Resour
Page 69 and 70:
Wier M, Weintraub J, Humphreys EH,
Page 71 and 72:
health by 6 percentage points; and
Page 73 and 74:
http://www.cityofrichmondgeneralpla
Page 75 and 76:
subway service, and over 50 percent
Page 77 and 78:
Large city downtown: Urban center A
Page 79 and 80:
Another population suffering from h
Page 81 and 82:
Activity-based model development is
Page 83 and 84:
METRIC: GENERAL TRANSPORTATION 7. W
Page 85 and 86:
FUTURE GROWTH METRIC: FUTURE GROWTH
Page 87 and 88:
ECONOMIC METRIC: ECONOMIC 9. a) Per
Page 89 and 90:
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION METRIC: ENV
Page 91 and 92:
STANDARDS Walking & biking The Surg
Page 93 and 94:
emissions to impairments of lung fu
Page 95 and 96:
RD 3.2 Reduce asthma hospitalizatio
Page 97 and 98:
CARB 2005 Guidance on Preventing Ai
Page 99 and 100:
Institute, Public Health Law and Po
Page 101 and 102:
EQUITY METRIC: EQUITY f. Measure an
Page 103 and 104:
HOW TO USE THE HEALTH AND EQUITY ME
Page 105 and 106:
Appendix: Metrics recommended for f
Page 107 and 108:
xxii Schoeni RF, House JS, Kaplan G
Page 109 and 110:
lxi Campbell FA & Pungello E. (2000
Page 111 and 112:
ci Sallis JF, McKenzie TL. (1991).
Page 113 and 114:
cxliv Pisarski A. (2006). Commuting
Page 115 and 116:
cxci U.S. EPA. 2008. Inventory of U
Page 117 and 118:
ccxxxiv Beelen R, Hoek G, van den B
Page 119 and 120:
cclxxii Office of the Actuary, Cent
Page 121 and 122:
Signed by: Argelia Leon, Policy Man
Page 123 and 124:
I. Ensure Transportation Projects S
Page 125 and 126:
gentrification/displacement, air qu
Page 127 and 128:
Liz O’Donoghue Director of Infras
Page 129 and 130:
infrastructure in those communities
Page 131 and 132:
high speed/high volume arterials or
Page 133 and 134:
Attachment: Specific Comments about
Page 135 and 136:
January 9, 2011 Sacramento Area Cou
Page 137 and 138:
next four years so that the next MT
Page 139 and 140:
We appreciate working with SACOG, i
Page 141 and 142:
We note that the work to develop th
Page 143 and 144:
Policy 9: Greenhouse Gas emission r
Page 145 and 146:
• Modify Strategy 30.4 as follows
Page 147 and 148:
PO Box 1526 • Sacramento, CA •
Page 149 and 150:
This study by the Urban Land Instit
Page 151 and 152:
Further, while SACOG has used the b
Page 153 and 154:
from SHA to SACOG re MTP/SCS 2035 L
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162: from SHA to SACOG re MTP/SCS 2035 L
Page 163 and 164: from SHA to SACOG re MTP/SCS 2035 L
Page 165: file://C:\Documents and Settings\CH
Page 175 and 176: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL J
Page 177 and 178: Consideration of this information
Page 179: egulations can help to ensure that
Page 187 and 188: Yuba County Elected Official Inform
Page 201 and 202: Lincoln Community Meeting Comments
Page 211: Lincoln Community Meeting Comments
Page 215 and 216: Colfax City Council Meeting Comment
show all

Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?