Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog
Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog
Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>SCS</strong> Health & Equity Metrics August 2011<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Annual number of pedestrian and bicycle collisions (and severity of injury/fatality)<br />
Proportion of households that can walk or bike to meet at least 50% of their daily needs<br />
Proportion of daily trips less than 3 miles and less than 1 mile by mode<br />
Daily amount (in minutes) of work‐trip and non‐work trip related physical activity<br />
Share of housing growth, proportion of projected population growth, and proportion of<br />
projected jobs in transit priority areas<br />
Percent of household income consumed by housing and transportation combined and<br />
separately<br />
For all daily trips, per capita miles traveled by mode (walking, biking, transit, vehicle)<br />
Pre‐mature mortality attributed to traffic related ambient PM2.5, and asthma incidence<br />
and exacerbations attributed to traffic related NO2.<br />
‐ We commend SACOG’s analysis of the proportion of residents within 500 feet of high volume<br />
roadways and stratification by EJ and non‐EJ populations. It is acknowledged that in both 2008<br />
and 2035, the percentage of the total EJ population living within 500 feet of high volume<br />
roadways exceeds that of non‐EJ populations by 2 to 1. Between 2008 and 2035, this proportion<br />
of the regional EJ population changes from 3.3% to 4%, while this proportion of the regional<br />
non‐EJ population changes from 1.6% to 1.8%. In addition to analyzing this within a 1,000 foot<br />
buffer rather than a 500‐foot buffer, as stated above, we recommend ensuring that the EJ<br />
population does not bear such a larger brunt of this proportional increase as compared to the<br />
non‐EJ population. In addition, we recommend also estimating the proportion of affordable<br />
housing units versus market rate units within the 1,000‐foot buffer.<br />
Chapter 9: Economic Vitality<br />
‐ SACOG’s land use strategies of focusing new housing near current jobs and new jobs near<br />
current housing helps to decrease the cause of the largest amount of VMT, which is that driving<br />
to work is usually the longest trip of the day. Other prioritized projects such as HOV lanes,<br />
Transportation Demand Management, improving and increasing transit, and adding Class 1 and<br />
2 bike lanes, also contributes to the decrease of VMT, and ultimately of the regional exposure to<br />
vehicle emissions, as well as encouraging physical activity.<br />
‐ Considering the rural community in the SACOG region separately is another success strategy<br />
that SACOG has employed to refine solutions for rural roads that are targeted to their needs.<br />
‐ The detailed analysis of the goods movement industry was good to see. The alternative routing<br />
decisions of truck drivers to avoid congestion is a concern, and trucks backing up local traffic as<br />
well as destroying pavement because of their use of rural roads. SACOG has considered some<br />
creative solutions, but looking toward some of the regions that have been dealing with goods<br />
movement for ideas about fees, fines, incentives, and other policies to enable counties and<br />
towns to capture costs that they are bearing would warrant investigation.<br />
‐ We commend the inclusion of the financial and economic development benefits of bicycle and<br />
pedestrian infrastructure projects, and would also include health benefits as well, especially if<br />
SACOG can adopt the measure of physical activity gleaned from all modes of transportation.<br />
‐11‐<br />
Page 47 of 165