19.06.2014 Views

Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

seem to suggest a preference for a greater variety of housing choice—in particular, increased<br />

demand for attached and smaller lot single family product nearer amenities and with greater<br />

transportation choices. Compared to the current available housing choices, the <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> moves<br />

the region in the right direction.<br />

But when considering the latest available housing market studies, it appears that the SACOG<br />

<strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> may not go far enough in the right direction. A November, 2011 report from the<br />

Urban Land Institute (ULI) entitled The New California Dream compares the current (2010)<br />

supply of various housing product types to future (2035) market demand in California’s four<br />

largest regions i . The ULI report makes two particularly relevant findings for the Sacramento<br />

region:<br />

1. The 2010 supply of large lot single family housing (>1/8 th acre) in the SACOG region<br />

exceeds the projected demand for this housing type in 2035. Stated more clearly: the<br />

SACOG region already has more of this product type than will be needed in 2035, even<br />

assuming population growth. By contrast, the demand for small lot single family and<br />

attached products is strong and exceeds current supply by approximately 453,000 units,<br />

illustrated below in Figure 4.1.<br />

2. The projected 2035 demand for homes near transit is so strong that even if all new units<br />

constructed in the SACOG region between 2010 and 2035 were located near transit, the<br />

2035 demand would still outstrip supply, as depicted in Figure 4.2, below.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!