Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SCS Health & Equity Metrics August 2011 Sacramento Area Bicycle Advocates California WALKS Appendix A: SACOG performance measures compared to health and equity metrics Appendix B: Health & Equity comments on SACOG Policies & Strategies Appendix C: Elevating Health in the Sustainable Communities Strategy: full report and 1 page summary of metrics of measurement methods Cc: Kacey Lizon, SACOG Senior Planner ‐14‐ Page 50 of 165
SCS Health & Equity Metrics August 2011 Appendix A: Comparison Table: SACOG performance measures and Health & Equity in SCS Metrics In this comparison table, each Health & Equity indicator (from Human Impact Partners’ report entitled “Elevating Health and Equity in Sustainable Communities Strategies”; see Appendix C) is listed in the right hand column, in the MTP/SCS Section where HIP identified that it would most likely fit. In some cases, the Health & Equity indicator was very similar to an existing performance measure included in the MTP/SCS, and in this case it was placed beside the existing measure. The number in parentheses corresponds to the number of the indicator in HIP’s report (see Appendix C). The report contains suggested methodologies and resources. The purpose of this table is simply to compare SACOG’s performance measures with the Health and Equity in SCS Metrics. For requests and recommendations, please refer to the comment letter and to Appendix B. Section MTP/SCS performance measure Health & Equity measure Land Use Measures Housing Growth in housing units by Community Type Change in housing product mix by Community Type Housing growth through reinvestment a. Percent of household income consumed by housing and transportation combined; b. Percent of income going towards housing costs. (9) Employm Employment growth in different Community ent Types by sector Employment growth by Community Type Employment growth through reinvestment Land Use Compact development: growth in population compared with acres developed Farmland acres developed – total and per capita Vernal acres developed Developed acres by Community Type Mix of uses Jobs‐Housing balance within four‐mile radius of employment centers Mix of use by Community Type Proportion of households that can walk or bike (10 minutes) to meet at least 50% of their daily needs. Public daily needs defined as: schools, parks, healthcare institutions and transit. Private daily needs defined as: restaurants, grocery stores, food markets and childcare. (3) ‐15‐ Page 51 of 165
Page 1 and 2: Page 1 of 1 What are you commenting
Page 3 and 4: Page 1 of 1 eircomments sacog - Dav
Page 5 and 6: file://C:\Documents and Settings\CH
Page 7 and 8: Roseville Public Hearing Comments f
Page 15 and 16: Coalition on Regional Equity MTP/SC
Page 17 and 18: Coalition on Regional Equity MTP/SC
Page 19 and 20: Page 19 of 165
Page 29 and 30: Sacramento Public Hearing Comments
Page 31 and 32: 909 12 th Street Sacramento, CA 958
Page 37 and 38: Sacramento Area Council of Governme
Page 39 and 40: SCS Health & Equity Metrics August
Page 49: SCS Health & Equity Metrics August
Page 67 and 68: The effort was funded by the Resour
Page 69 and 70: Wier M, Weintraub J, Humphreys EH,
Page 71 and 72: health by 6 percentage points; and
Page 73 and 74: http://www.cityofrichmondgeneralpla
Page 75 and 76: subway service, and over 50 percent
Page 77 and 78: Large city downtown: Urban center A
Page 79 and 80: Another population suffering from h
Page 81 and 82: Activity-based model development is
Page 83 and 84: METRIC: GENERAL TRANSPORTATION 7. W
Page 85 and 86: FUTURE GROWTH METRIC: FUTURE GROWTH
Page 87 and 88: ECONOMIC METRIC: ECONOMIC 9. a) Per
Page 89 and 90: ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION METRIC: ENV
Page 91 and 92: STANDARDS Walking & biking The Surg
Page 93 and 94: emissions to impairments of lung fu
Page 95 and 96: RD 3.2 Reduce asthma hospitalizatio
Page 97 and 98: CARB 2005 Guidance on Preventing Ai
Page 99 and 100: Institute, Public Health Law and Po
Page 101 and 102:
EQUITY METRIC: EQUITY f. Measure an
Page 103 and 104:
HOW TO USE THE HEALTH AND EQUITY ME
Page 105 and 106:
Appendix: Metrics recommended for f
Page 107 and 108:
xxii Schoeni RF, House JS, Kaplan G
Page 109 and 110:
lxi Campbell FA & Pungello E. (2000
Page 111 and 112:
ci Sallis JF, McKenzie TL. (1991).
Page 113 and 114:
cxliv Pisarski A. (2006). Commuting
Page 115 and 116:
cxci U.S. EPA. 2008. Inventory of U
Page 117 and 118:
ccxxxiv Beelen R, Hoek G, van den B
Page 119 and 120:
cclxxii Office of the Actuary, Cent
Page 121 and 122:
Signed by: Argelia Leon, Policy Man
Page 123 and 124:
I. Ensure Transportation Projects S
Page 125 and 126:
gentrification/displacement, air qu
Page 127 and 128:
Liz O’Donoghue Director of Infras
Page 129 and 130:
infrastructure in those communities
Page 131 and 132:
high speed/high volume arterials or
Page 133 and 134:
Attachment: Specific Comments about
Page 135 and 136:
January 9, 2011 Sacramento Area Cou
Page 137 and 138:
next four years so that the next MT
Page 139 and 140:
We appreciate working with SACOG, i
Page 141 and 142:
We note that the work to develop th
Page 143 and 144:
Policy 9: Greenhouse Gas emission r
Page 145 and 146:
• Modify Strategy 30.4 as follows
Page 147 and 148:
PO Box 1526 • Sacramento, CA •
Page 149 and 150:
This study by the Urban Land Instit
Page 151 and 152:
Further, while SACOG has used the b
Page 153 and 154:
from SHA to SACOG re MTP/SCS 2035 L
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165:
file://C:\Documents and Settings\CH
Page 175 and 176:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL J
Page 177 and 178:
Consideration of this information
Page 179:
egulations can help to ensure that
Page 187 and 188:
Yuba County Elected Official Inform
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Lincoln Community Meeting Comments
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Colfax City Council Meeting Comment
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
show all

Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?