Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog
Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog
Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Yuba County Elected Official Information Session Public <strong>Comments</strong> from January 25, 2012<br />
Jim Seif<br />
Process is a sham. Decisions are already made by developers; we didn’t get to<br />
sit at the table when plans were being made.<br />
He and others are not being properly represented at SACOG by their local<br />
elected who sit on SACOG board; local SACOG representatives don’t record or<br />
report back their SACOG actions.<br />
SACOG says we have local control, but SB 375 says communities will be sued if<br />
not incompliance with regional plan.<br />
SACOG is deciding how, where, and when people should live and that’s wrong.<br />
Yuba and Sutter are different from Sacramento and our elected officials aren’t<br />
hearing us say we don’t want this.<br />
Process should include real public input for all citizens. If citizens could vote on<br />
SACOG Board, they would vote to get out of SACOG.<br />
The comments here are summaries of the oral testimonies provided at this public meeting.
Change language