19.06.2014 Views

Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Further, while SACOG has used the best data currently available, it is roundly recognized that<br />

comprehensive, accurate, up-to-date natural resource data does not exist for the region to do<br />

sufficient analysis of these impacts.<br />

The lack of data is demonstrated by the plan's simple justification that the 37,500 acres of habitat<br />

impacted represents only "one percent of the 2,543,519 acres of habitat and land cover in the<br />

region today," (<strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong>, 7-16). However, the vast majority of this regional habitat resides in the<br />

National Forest in the mountains, while the vast majority of the impacts are in the valley and<br />

foothills where viable habitat differs greatly and is much more sparse. In the future, a<br />

proportionate analysis of habitat impacts on the valley must be undergone, at a regional level, to<br />

adequately assess environmental sustainability of the <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong>.<br />

We believe that the interests of equity, public heath, and economic prosperity in compact transitoriented<br />

urban planning are best served by complimentary planning for natural resource and<br />

open-space conservation. Improved natural resource data, analysis and conservation strategies<br />

need to be developed to compliment the <strong>SCS</strong>, to further incentivize adherence to the valuable<br />

urban plan that SACOG has developed.<br />

In the future, this data could be used:<br />

As a public decision-support tool for targeting responsible and efficient investment for<br />

development and conservation.<br />

To enable participation in/development of a Regional Advanced Mitigation Program<br />

To demonstrate co-benefits for ecology, public health, recreation and education, as well<br />

as the economic imperatives for habitat/open-space conservation<br />

To demonstrate co-benefits and economic imperatives to preserve ecosystem services,<br />

(ie. carbon sequestration, flood management and groundwater recharge)<br />

Conclusion:<br />

To reiterate, we applaud SACOG's first joint <strong>SCS</strong>/<strong>MTP</strong>, and we hope the above comments are<br />

constructive to implementation of the plan. We also commend the extensive efforts of SACOG<br />

staff to engage the public throughout the <strong>MTP</strong> process. We greatly appreciate the time and<br />

attention that has been provided us in addressing our concerns and suggestions in development of<br />

this plan, and we look forward to our continued work with SACOG moving forward.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

Jonathan Ellison, President<br />

ECOS Board of Directors<br />

Page 151 of 165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!