Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

More documents

Recommendations

Info

<strong>SCS</strong> Health & Equity Metrics August 2011 TOD Urban Design Growth in dwelling units within half‐mile of quality transit (in TPA) by county Growth in employees within half‐mile of quality transit (in TPA) by county New housing product mix in TPA by county Proximity to transit by Community Type Change in street pattern in different Community Types Change in residential density by Community Type Transportation Measures Driving Access VMT Total jobs within 30‐minute drive by Community Type Total weekday VMT & average annual growth rates – regionally, by county, and per capita Weekday VMT by source and total Commute share of HH generated VMT Weekday VMT by source per capita or per job Total VMT per capita % change in VMT per capita or per job compared to 2008 Weekday HH‐generated VMT per capita by Community Type Weekday HH‐generated VMT per capita by TPA HH‐generated commute VMT by Community Type and regional total Commute VMT per worker by Community Type and regional total a. Share of housing growth in transit priority areas, targeting measure of how many large (3‐4) bedroom units, senior housing, low‐income units will be built; b. Proportion of projected population growth located in transit priority areas; c. Proportion of projected jobs in transit priority areas (8) Proportion of households and proportion of jobs within 1/4 mile of local public transit (including both bus and rail) or 1/2 mile of a regional public transit, that has less than 15 minute frequencies (4) Daily amount (in minutes) of work‐trip and non‐work trip related physical activity (6) a. Percent of household income consumed by housing and transportation combined; c. Percent of income going towards transportation costs (9) For all daily trips, per capita miles traveled by mode (walking, biking, transit, vehicle) (10) Proportion of daily trips less than 3 miles and less than 1 mile by mode (walking/biking/bus and rail transit/driving) (5) Congeste Congested VMT total and per capita ‐16‐ Page 52 of 165
<strong>SCS</strong> Health & Equity Metrics August 2011 d VMT Transit service Transit productiv ity Bike infrastruc ture Transit, walk and bike travel Roadway utilizatio n Commut e travel Noncommute travel Congested VMT by source – total, per capita, per job Congested VMT for HH‐generated travel by Community Type Increase in transit vehicle service hour per day by transit type Weekday transit vehicle service hours, passenger boardings, boardings per service hour, farebox revenues as % of operating cost Mile of bike route mileage by county Bike route miles per 100,000 population Weekday person trips by transit, walk and bike modes TWB trips per capita TWB trips per capita by CT Transit trips per capita by TPA TBW trips per capita by CT Transit trips per capita by TPA Underutilized, optimally utilized, overutilized roadways by roadway type Proportion of households and proportion of jobs within 1/4 mile of local public transit (including both bus and rail) or 1/2 mile of a regional public transit, that has less than 15 minute frequencies (4) Work and non‐work trip mode share (including biking, walking, transit (bus and train), carpooling and SOV) Both at peak times and all day (7) Weekday commute tours by mode Commute mode share Weekday non‐commute person trips by mode Work and non‐work trip mode share (including biking, walking, transit (bus and train), carpooling and SOV)‐ Both at peak times and all day (7) Non‐commute mode share Safety % reduction in accident rates Map annual number of pedestrian and bicycle collisions (and severity of injury/fatality): per capita, per geographic area, by daytime population (1) Environmental Measures Farmland Farmland conversion impacts Acres of impact from growth & transportation project by type of farmland % of Williamson Act contract acres impacted Habitat impacts % of habitat & land cover impacted Acres of impact from growth & trans project Total number of vehicle, bike and pedestrian collisions per capita, broken down by severity: fatalities and injuries (2) ‐17‐ Page 53 of 165
Page 1 and 2: Page 1 of 1 What are you commenting
Page 3 and 4: Page 1 of 1 eircomments sacog - Dav
Page 5 and 6: file://C:\Documents and Settings\CH
Page 7 and 8: Roseville Public Hearing Comments f
Page 15 and 16: Coalition on Regional Equity MTP/SC
Page 17 and 18: Coalition on Regional Equity MTP/SC
Page 19 and 20: Page 19 of 165
Page 29 and 30: Sacramento Public Hearing Comments
Page 31 and 32: 909 12 th Street Sacramento, CA 958
Page 37 and 38: Sacramento Area Council of Governme
Page 39 and 40: SCS Health & Equity Metrics August
Page 51: SCS Health & Equity Metrics August
Page 67 and 68: The effort was funded by the Resour
Page 69 and 70: Wier M, Weintraub J, Humphreys EH,
Page 71 and 72: health by 6 percentage points; and
Page 73 and 74: http://www.cityofrichmondgeneralpla
Page 75 and 76: subway service, and over 50 percent
Page 77 and 78: Large city downtown: Urban center A
Page 79 and 80: Another population suffering from h
Page 81 and 82: Activity-based model development is
Page 83 and 84: METRIC: GENERAL TRANSPORTATION 7. W
Page 85 and 86: FUTURE GROWTH METRIC: FUTURE GROWTH
Page 87 and 88: ECONOMIC METRIC: ECONOMIC 9. a) Per
Page 89 and 90: ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION METRIC: ENV
Page 91 and 92: STANDARDS Walking & biking The Surg
Page 93 and 94: emissions to impairments of lung fu
Page 95 and 96: RD 3.2 Reduce asthma hospitalizatio
Page 97 and 98: CARB 2005 Guidance on Preventing Ai
Page 99 and 100: Institute, Public Health Law and Po
Page 101 and 102: EQUITY METRIC: EQUITY f. Measure an
Page 103 and 104:
HOW TO USE THE HEALTH AND EQUITY ME
Page 105 and 106:
Appendix: Metrics recommended for f
Page 107 and 108:
xxii Schoeni RF, House JS, Kaplan G
Page 109 and 110:
lxi Campbell FA & Pungello E. (2000
Page 111 and 112:
ci Sallis JF, McKenzie TL. (1991).
Page 113 and 114:
cxliv Pisarski A. (2006). Commuting
Page 115 and 116:
cxci U.S. EPA. 2008. Inventory of U
Page 117 and 118:
ccxxxiv Beelen R, Hoek G, van den B
Page 119 and 120:
cclxxii Office of the Actuary, Cent
Page 121 and 122:
Signed by: Argelia Leon, Policy Man
Page 123 and 124:
I. Ensure Transportation Projects S
Page 125 and 126:
gentrification/displacement, air qu
Page 127 and 128:
Liz O’Donoghue Director of Infras
Page 129 and 130:
infrastructure in those communities
Page 131 and 132:
high speed/high volume arterials or
Page 133 and 134:
Attachment: Specific Comments about
Page 135 and 136:
January 9, 2011 Sacramento Area Cou
Page 137 and 138:
next four years so that the next MT
Page 139 and 140:
We appreciate working with SACOG, i
Page 141 and 142:
We note that the work to develop th
Page 143 and 144:
Policy 9: Greenhouse Gas emission r
Page 145 and 146:
• Modify Strategy 30.4 as follows
Page 147 and 148:
PO Box 1526 • Sacramento, CA •
Page 149 and 150:
This study by the Urban Land Instit
Page 151 and 152:
Further, while SACOG has used the b
Page 153 and 154:
from SHA to SACOG re MTP/SCS 2035 L
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165:
file://C:\Documents and Settings\CH
Page 175 and 176:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL J
Page 177 and 178:
Consideration of this information
Page 179:
egulations can help to ensure that
Page 187 and 188:
Yuba County Elected Official Inform
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Lincoln Community Meeting Comments
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Colfax City Council Meeting Comment
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
show all

Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?