Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog
Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog
Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>SCS</strong> Health & Equity Metrics August 2011<br />
<strong>SCS</strong> Health & Equity Performance Metrics<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
In 2008, the California legislature passed SB375, the intent of which is to decrease emissions of<br />
greenhouse gases to target levels in each region of the state. Given the connection between how<br />
our environment is built and health behaviors, outcomes, and inequities, this is a unique<br />
opportunity to elevate health and equity into transportation and land use planning.<br />
The bodies responsible for implementation are the Metropolitan Planning Organizations<br />
(MPOs) in each of the 18 regions of the state, and they are planning for this change through<br />
their Regional Transportation Plans (RTPs), an update of transportation policies and guidelines,<br />
as well as guidance on the types of projects (and in some cases the actual projects) that will be<br />
constructed over the next 25 years. Within the RTPs, all MPOs will be developing a Sustainable<br />
Communities Strategy (<strong>SCS</strong>), which is the document and vision for decreasing greenhouse gas<br />
emissions through transportation and land use planning.<br />
Given the high levels of chronic disease, including obesity, diabetes, and asthma, that we are<br />
facing as a country, it is imperative that we address the root causes. We spend a higher percent<br />
of our GDP on healthcare than any other country and while access to healthcare and genetics are<br />
important factors that determine our health status, there is growing recognition that the land use<br />
and transportation systems that influence our personal behaviors affect our health status even<br />
more. As described below, transportation systems impact health in many ways, through injuries<br />
and fatalities, environmental quality (e.g., air quality and noise), physical activity, and income.<br />
These impacts are typically not distributed evenly across all populations, with lower income<br />
populations and communities of color often facing worse outcomes for a variety of reasons.<br />
Understanding the causes of these differences is an important piece of addressing them. For this<br />
reason, we believe that equity (defined here to mean the absence of systematic disparities in<br />
health or in the major social determinants of health, between groups with different levels of<br />
underlying social advantage/disadvantage 1 ) must be assessed in addition to health.<br />
A statewide group of public health advocates convened by Human Impact Partners has<br />
developed the following set of 13 performance metrics for use in the RTP/<strong>SCS</strong> processes across<br />
the state. In the past, public health and equity have not been fully considered in land use and<br />
transportation planning and many health and equity outcomes related to those plans have been<br />
poor. We hope to inform the discussion of performance metrics with a health perspective and<br />
thereby improve future health outcomes related to these planning efforts. MPOs across the state<br />
are including different voices in the Sustainable Communities Strategy discussions as part of their<br />
RTPs. Our hope is that MPOs will consider including the following metrics in their <strong>SCS</strong>s and<br />
including public health and equity professionals and advocates in the process of developing their<br />
RTP/<strong>SCS</strong>.<br />
This document lists the 13 health and equity performance metrics prioritized by statewide health<br />
experts, agencies, advocates, and transportation planners. This list of 13 was chosen from an<br />
original 129 indicators.<br />
‐29‐<br />
Page 65 of 165