19.06.2014 Views

Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

Draft MTP/SCS Comments Received - sacog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

infrastructure in those communities and with the types of facilities that will result in<br />

the biggest increases in mode-share.<br />

The following strategies will help achieve a 20% non-commute bike/pedestrian<br />

mode-share by 2035:<br />

Invest in bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure as soon as possible and<br />

during the planning period to begin reaping benefits in mode-share increase<br />

as soon as possible.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Set an equally aggressive goal for increasing the densities of urban land use<br />

to make bike and pedestrian travel more viable,<br />

909 12 T H STREET, SUITE 116 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 (916) 4 44-6 600 WWW.SACBIKE.ORG<br />

Focus funded projects on communities with high mode-shift potential<br />

such as mixed-use, high-density, and transit-priority areas. For example,<br />

Environmental Justice Areas have the highest existing mode share for<br />

bicycling and walking. EJA mode share is forecast to increase at 4 times the<br />

rate of the increase in bike/pedestrian mode-share in non EJAs (Table 8.9).<br />

Therefore, roadway and bike and pedestrian projects in EJA areas should<br />

receive much higher priority for early funding.<br />

Prioritize bicycle infrastructure improvements on low-volume/low-speed<br />

roadways and streets that will be much more attractive for bicycling by a<br />

broader swath of our population than on high-speed/high-volume arterials.<br />

2. The <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> 2035 should strengthen the Policies and Supportive Strategies<br />

presented in Chapter 6 to better focus on assuring “Complete Streets” are<br />

implemented wherever possible throughout the region. We believe that most<br />

<strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> funded projects should have complete street elements and follow<br />

complete street principles. Nearly all transportation projects can have positive or<br />

negative impacts on travel by foot, bike, or transit and therefore should be planned<br />

with complete-street considerations, including all surface-street projects and all<br />

maintenance and rehabilitation of surface streets. Even freeway projects that create<br />

wide interchanges with high vehicle volumes and speeds should be required to<br />

install extraordinary protections for bicyclists and pedestrians in otherwise hostile<br />

environments (for example, the Hwy 50/Watt Avenue interchange project has<br />

required special bike and pedestrian infrastructure so that bicyclists and pedestrians<br />

can get safely travel through the interchange area).<br />

Expanding Complete Streets in the region is a critical way to address the Guiding<br />

Principles of the <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong>. However, Complete Streets are not the subject of any of<br />

the 31 policies (and only a few of the strategies) presented in Chapter 6 of the<br />

<strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong>.<br />

We recommend that SACOG better define the extent and purpose of adopting a<br />

Complete Streets policy as mentioned in Strategy 9.1 (page 6-7). Strategy 9.1<br />

supports a policy to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The <strong>MTP</strong>/<strong>SCS</strong> 2035<br />

Page 129 of 165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!