19.06.2014 Views

Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College

Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College

Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fall 2007 Biology 3A Abstracts<br />

27. THE EFFICACY OF GARLIC (ALLIUM SATIVUM ) AS A BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF MOSQUITO<br />

LARVA. Roky Coria. Department of Biological Sciences, <strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>College</strong>, Mission Viejo, California<br />

92692<br />

Garlic (Allium sativum) has been cultivated by humans for thousands of years and has been valued by<br />

many civilizations as an important spice with medicinal properties. Allium sativum has evolved a defense<br />

mechanism to protect itself from bacteria, fungi, insects and other animals. These properties of A. sativum<br />

suggest a potential application as an effective mosquito larvicide. The objective of this study was to<br />

evaluate the rate of effectiveness of raw garlic against mosquito larva and compare this to the rate of<br />

effectiveness of a commercial larvicide. Data was collected on the deaths per day of mosquito larva<br />

exposed to a garlic solution, and mosquito larva exposed to commercial larvicide. Both garlic and the<br />

commercial larvicide, MosquitoDunks®, were toxic to the mosquito larva. However, the mean number of<br />

deaths per day in the larva exposed to garlic solution was significantly less than the number of deaths per<br />

day in the group exposed to MosquitoDunks®. The results of the study indicate that the rate of<br />

effectiveness of the garlic solution is not significant compared to the effectiveness of MosquitoDunks®<br />

(p=.92409). The rate of effectiveness of the garlic solution would vary depending on the concentration<br />

used. Therefore, further research on the effectiveness of garlic at different concentrations is necessary to<br />

evaluate garlic’s larvicidal properties against mosquitoes.<br />

28. EFFECTS OF AUDITORY AND CHEMICAL STIMULI IN MAMMALIAN MEMORY (Mus musculus).<br />

John Lowd and Charles Steinfeld. Department of Biological Sciences, <strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>College</strong>, Mission Viejo,<br />

California 92692<br />

Memory is increasingly vital to production and efficiency in today’s society. There are several over the<br />

counter remedies for memory enhancement, we tested the product Leovit produced by Leovit Nutrio<br />

(Russia). We also tested the effect of predatory stimuli on mouse memory. It was hypothesized that the<br />

mean time to complete the maze for the mice treated with the Leovit memory enhancing supplement<br />

would be significantly lower than for the group of mice that received no treatment. It was also<br />

hypothesized that the group of mice that were exposed to Western Screech Owl (Megascops kennecotti)<br />

calls would have a significantly higher mean time comparative to the control group receiving no treatment.<br />

Mean time for the control mice to complete the maze was calculated (200.2 seconds ± 25.3 s.e.) After 5<br />

days of treatment the mice treated with Leovit achieved a mean time (154.2 seconds ± 19.2 s.e.) this<br />

difference was not considered statistically significant (p=0.141, two-tailed t-test assuming unequal<br />

variance). After receiving treatment for ten days, the Leovit Group’s mean time (118.9 seconds ± 6.1 s.e.)<br />

was considerably lower than the control group’s mean (159.7 seconds ± 13.2 s.e.). These values are<br />

considered to be statistically significant (p=.006, two-tailed t-test assuming unequal variance). The mean<br />

time for the group of mice receiving auditory stimuli for the 2 nd and 3 rd trials (206.8 seconds ± 21.6 s.e. &<br />

182.4 seconds ± 11.7 s.e.) respectively, was higher than the control group’s mean, however, these values<br />

were not considered statistically significant (p=1.8, two-tailed t-test assuming unequal variance for both<br />

trials).<br />

111<br />

<strong>Saddleback</strong> Journal of Biology<br />

<strong>Spring</strong> <strong>2008</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!