19.06.2014 Views

Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College

Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College

Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fall 2007 Biology 3A Abstracts<br />

mesophylls (Pearcy & Ustin, 1984). As salt<br />

concentrations increase, the uptake of water by the<br />

plant is inhibited, thus greatly affecting processes<br />

involving respiration and photosynthesis. In some<br />

terrestrial species, transpiration is affected by increased<br />

salinity as the stomata’s water vapor conductance is<br />

decreased (Biber, 2006). The leaves of several<br />

organisms have even shown signs of damage with the<br />

slightest changes in salinity (Flowers et al., 1985).<br />

Based on these similar previous studies, it is perceived<br />

that increased salt concentrations interfere with the<br />

plant’s primary biological processes.<br />

The objective of this research was to observe<br />

the effects that salinity has on the photosynthetic rates<br />

of S. virginica. The hypothesis tested was whether the<br />

plant would have a maximum photosynthetic rate in a<br />

freshwater solution, and if a high salinity level would<br />

damage the plant. Photosynthetic rates were<br />

determined by measuring the rate of oxygen<br />

production. The plants were introduced to three<br />

different salinity levels: 0%, 3.5%, and 6.0%. All test<br />

groups were studied under the same ambient<br />

conditions. By subjecting the plants to two different<br />

saline solutions, we were able to experiment with the<br />

plant’s natural seawater environment and also one in<br />

which the salt level was significantly higher.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

S. virginica were obtained from the marshes in<br />

Newport, California. The plants were cut at the stems,<br />

leaving the lateral branches intact. Each plant was<br />

weighed out to 10 g to ensure uniform mass for all<br />

samples.<br />

Each of the saline solutions was prepared in a<br />

beaker using ordinary table salt (NaCl) and distilled<br />

water. The concentrations prepared were 0%, 3.5%,<br />

and 6.0%. Prior to the experiment, the plants were<br />

immersed in their respective solutions and left to<br />

acclimate for a period of thirty minutes. One hundred<br />

watt lamps provided a light source for the plants. The<br />

lamps were placed forty inches away from the beakers.<br />

To measure the photosynthetic rates, data<br />

loggers equipped with oxygen meters (Pasco TM PS-<br />

2002) were used. After the plants had been given time<br />

to adjust to their environments, the oxygen probes were<br />

inserted into the beakers and data collecting began.<br />

Plants were then left in the controlled setting for a onehour<br />

period. Oxygen production rates were measured<br />

in mg/L by the data logger device. At the conclusion of<br />

each test period, the maximum, minimum, and average<br />

oxygen production levels were recorded. A total of four<br />

tests were performed for each solution group.<br />

Results<br />

Oxygen production by S. virginica was<br />

observed with all groups throughout the experimental<br />

Oxygen Production (mg/L)<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

57<br />

<strong>Saddleback</strong> Journal of Biology<br />

<strong>Spring</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />

period. The highest oxygen production levels were<br />

collected from the plants in the 3.5% saline groups,<br />

with the 0% groups having the next highest production<br />

levels (Fig. 1). The average oxygen production levels<br />

were 0.52 ± 0.020 mg/L in the 0% solution, 0.69 ±<br />

0.059 mg/L in the 3.5% solution, and 0.28 ± 0.053<br />

mg/L in the 6.0% solution (Fig. 2).<br />

The photosynthetic rates for the plants in the 3.5%<br />

and the 0% saline solutions increased at a higher rate<br />

throughout the one-hour period than the 6.0% saline<br />

group (Tab. 1). Although the 6.0% saline groups had<br />

lower oxygen production than other groups, none of the<br />

plants showed evidence of decreased photosynthetic<br />

rates or any signs of damage.<br />

0<br />

Oxygen Production (mg/L)<br />

in<br />

the<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

Salinity<br />

\when exposed to<br />

various saline<br />

solutions.<br />

0%<br />

Oxygen<br />

production<br />

3.50%<br />

6.00%<br />

Figure 1. Oxygen production (mg/L) of S. virginica when<br />

exposed to various saline solutions. Squares represent<br />

line for groups in 3.5% salinity; triangles represent<br />

groups in 0% salinity; and circles represent groups in<br />

6.0% salinity.<br />

levels were 0.52 ± 0.020 mg/L in 0%<br />

salinity,<br />

0.69 ±<br />

0.059 mg/L in the 3.5%<br />

solution, and 0.28 ± 0.053 mg/L<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60<br />

Time, min.<br />

Figure 2. Average oxygen production (mg/L) ±S.E.M. of<br />

four test groups of S. virginica when exposed to various<br />

saline solutions. Oxygen production levels were 0.52 ±<br />

0.020 mg/L in 0% salinity, 0.69 ± 0.059 mg/L in the<br />

3.5% salinity, and 0.28 ± 0.053 mg/L in 6.0% salinity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!