Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College
Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College
Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Fall 2007 Biology 3A Abstracts<br />
We found in our study that there is a significant<br />
difference between chemical and organic fertilizer.<br />
For taller, greener plants with more tomatoes in a<br />
shorter period of time, our experiment would<br />
suggest that chemical fertilizer indeed works best.<br />
Companies put nitrogen in the chemical fertilizer<br />
to allow for better growth. According to J. Heeb,<br />
high amounts of nitrogen result in faster plant growth<br />
(Heeb et al., 2005). Organic plants do not have<br />
this efficient production of nitrogen, they rely on<br />
microorganisms to break down and release<br />
nutrients so the process is much slower (Chu et al.,<br />
2006). Over a month’s time, we did not have any<br />
actual full tomato growth, so we cannot say<br />
whether or not the tomatoes would be better<br />
tasting or larger in size, but the aspects of the<br />
chemically fed tomato plants help to indicate that<br />
the tomatoes might be larger in size. The<br />
chemically fed plants grew much larger in a short<br />
amount of time than the organically fed plants,<br />
they also, through the use of a chlorophyll<br />
concentration test, produced much greener leaves<br />
which helps to show how they would indeed be<br />
creating more sugars through photosynthesis thus<br />
possibly yielding more fruit. It has been tested in<br />
other studies that the more nitrogen produced<br />
during the growth of a plant the more it grows and<br />
chemical fertilizers add nitrogen to the soil the<br />
plant is growing in (Wang et al., 2001). In conclusion,<br />
we found, along with many other studies, that for larger<br />
more productive tomato plants, chemical fertilizer<br />
works the best compared to organic fertilizer.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Chu, H., Fujii, T., Morimoto, S., Lin, X., Hu, J., and<br />
Zhang, J. 2006. Community Struction of Ammonia-<br />
Oxidizing Bacteria under Long-Term Application of<br />
Mineral Fertilizer and Organic Manure in a Sandy<br />
Loam Soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology.<br />
73: 485-491<br />
Heeb, A., Lundegardh, B., Errcsson, T., and Savage, P.<br />
2007. Nitrogen form affects yield and taste of<br />
tomatoes. Journal of the Science of Food and<br />
Agriculture. 85: 1405-1414<br />
Wang, Y., Garvin, D., and Kochian, L. 2001. Nitrate-<br />
Inducted Genes in Tomato Roots. Array Analysis<br />
Reveals Novel Genes That May Play a Role in<br />
Nitrogen Nutrition. Plant Physiol. 127: 345-359<br />
66<br />
<strong>Saddleback</strong> Journal of Biology<br />
<strong>Spring</strong> <strong>2008</strong>