Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College
Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College
Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Fall 2007 Biology 3A Abstracts<br />
60<br />
Average Vertical Jump Height (cm)<br />
Figure 1. The average vertical jump height between<br />
athletes (55 2.13cm, N=18) and non-athletes (37.5 <br />
2.22cm, N=25). Athletes significantly (two tailed, p=<br />
6<br />
1.3<br />
10 ) jumped vertically higher than nonathletes.<br />
Average Calf length (cm)<br />
Figure 2. The average calf lengths between athletes<br />
(38 0.90 cm, N=18) and non-athletes (37.5 2.22<br />
cm, N=25). There was no significant difference found.<br />
Vertical Jump Height (cm)<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
50<br />
45<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
0<br />
athletes<br />
athletes<br />
non-athletes<br />
non-athletes<br />
28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48<br />
Calf Length (cm)<br />
Figure 3. The vertical jump heights (44.82cm) of the<br />
participants (N=43) compared with their calf length<br />
(38cm) to determined if the longer the calf length the<br />
higher the vertical jump. There was no correlation<br />
found (R 2 =0.40).<br />
Vertical Jump height (cm)<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48<br />
Calf Length (cm)<br />
athletes<br />
non-athletes<br />
Linear (athletes)<br />
Linear (non-athletes)<br />
Figure 4. A comparison between the athletes’ (N=18)<br />
vertical jump height (55cm) versus their calf lengths<br />
(38cm) in order to see if a higher vertical height is<br />
achieved because of a longer calf length. There was no<br />
correlation found (R 2 =0.58). The same comparison<br />
was done between non-athletes’ (N=25) vertical jump<br />
height (37.5cm) and calf length (37.5cm). No<br />
correlation was also shown (R 2 =0.59).<br />
Discussion<br />
Athletes were found to significantly jump<br />
higher than non-athletes. However, the average calf<br />
length of the athletes and non-athletes had no statistical<br />
difference; as a result, the vertical jump height was not<br />
influenced by the calf length. This can be due to two<br />
main factors: muscle mass in the leg and specific types<br />
of training. Golomer et al. (2004) and Harley et al.<br />
(2002) both found in their study of ballet dancers that<br />
muscle mass in the leg is directly linked to jump<br />
height. The dancers with the greater quantity of muscle<br />
in the leg jumped significantly higher than those with<br />
less amounts.<br />
Specific types of training are another major<br />
factor, which are used to increase vertical jumping<br />
when more muscle mass is not the main focus and less<br />
desired. Plyometrics and vibration are some of these<br />
training regimens that sports have being using in order<br />
to increase vertical jump height, which have been<br />
shown to be successful. This type of training<br />
concentrates on the neuromuscular aspects of<br />
development in power, which is beneficial for sports<br />
similar to dance and basketball (Luo et al., 2005;<br />
Radcliffe and Farentinos, 1999; Wyon et al., 2006).<br />
Leg muscle mass and training can also explain<br />
why no correlation was found between the vertical<br />
jump height and calf length for the athletes, nonathletes,<br />
and all the data put together. Because<br />
depending on the type of athletes and how they train<br />
will determine whether they are able to jump vertically<br />
83<br />
<strong>Saddleback</strong> Journal of Biology<br />
<strong>Spring</strong> <strong>2008</strong>